I think the article pretty clearly talks about a series of events and decisions that will restrict the hobby and will likely hold it back. Unfortunately these days no politician is going to stick their neck out for something unless it has commercial value to them (and their backers or powerful voices within their electorate).
What would happen to the reefs in Indonesia for example if this ban was made permanent and expanded to ornamental fish too? I bet a whole lot more reef would be dynamited and totally destroyed. This current ban increases the risk of this and I suspect has been put into place partially for this reason. It has also been documented (there is lot's of videos / articles on it) how our hobby provides good sustainable jobs and the value of the animals is much higher. Now everywhere (including in Indonesia) everyone in the hobby (I think) agrees that cyanide should be eradicated and livestock handling should be improved.
This is an industry problem, something every hobbyist wants (and is prepared to pay at least a little more for) but something very few in the industry seem to have got behind and I include all the manufacturers in this.
If the industry did only this they would have a much more secure future.
There is a huge risk to anyone who sets up a business collecting (or anywhere in the supply chain) for corals and fish. That risk seems to increase all the time and I believe they need support.
I'm not so worried about the hobby having access to limited numbers of wild corals. From what I understand wild corals are a bit hit and miss and I would rather get something I know will do well and have good color even if it is much smaller.
I am worried that collecting fish will be severely restricted (whilst wild populations continue to be decimated by other industries). We simply need more aquaculture but breeding fish / inverts is not something many hobbyists can do.
I am worried that it is so easy for a government, with the stroke of a pen, to shut down something that is a positive (in comparison to a future without it).
I know that ban in Texas someone wrote about was ridiculous - it probably ensures the extinction of the Arabian Onyx (if my memory is correct.
Governments certainly are not doing near enough to protect certain important ecosystems and the planet. They do what is best for them, ignoring the science and ensuring a dark future.
Still there are questions over our hobby. Whilst we hobbyists care the industry (largely) doesn't. Fish are still collected with cyanide and as the industry allows that we are open to criticism. Too high a percentage of livestock die in transit. We as hobbyists are sick of it. LFS are sick of it. From an outsiders perspective its a super expensive pet that usually dies.
And before anyone says "some company that makes pumps and skimmers can't do anything" they can - BRS canceled my entire order because they found out I live overseas and that's because the manufacturers demand it.
It's not that hard for them to have standards, have importers sign up to that and weed out the bad actors.
It's then much easier for our hobby to tell a positive story and harder to shut us down.
What would happen to the reefs in Indonesia for example if this ban was made permanent and expanded to ornamental fish too? I bet a whole lot more reef would be dynamited and totally destroyed. This current ban increases the risk of this and I suspect has been put into place partially for this reason. It has also been documented (there is lot's of videos / articles on it) how our hobby provides good sustainable jobs and the value of the animals is much higher. Now everywhere (including in Indonesia) everyone in the hobby (I think) agrees that cyanide should be eradicated and livestock handling should be improved.
This is an industry problem, something every hobbyist wants (and is prepared to pay at least a little more for) but something very few in the industry seem to have got behind and I include all the manufacturers in this.
If the industry did only this they would have a much more secure future.
There is a huge risk to anyone who sets up a business collecting (or anywhere in the supply chain) for corals and fish. That risk seems to increase all the time and I believe they need support.
I'm not so worried about the hobby having access to limited numbers of wild corals. From what I understand wild corals are a bit hit and miss and I would rather get something I know will do well and have good color even if it is much smaller.
I am worried that collecting fish will be severely restricted (whilst wild populations continue to be decimated by other industries). We simply need more aquaculture but breeding fish / inverts is not something many hobbyists can do.
I am worried that it is so easy for a government, with the stroke of a pen, to shut down something that is a positive (in comparison to a future without it).
I know that ban in Texas someone wrote about was ridiculous - it probably ensures the extinction of the Arabian Onyx (if my memory is correct.
Governments certainly are not doing near enough to protect certain important ecosystems and the planet. They do what is best for them, ignoring the science and ensuring a dark future.
Still there are questions over our hobby. Whilst we hobbyists care the industry (largely) doesn't. Fish are still collected with cyanide and as the industry allows that we are open to criticism. Too high a percentage of livestock die in transit. We as hobbyists are sick of it. LFS are sick of it. From an outsiders perspective its a super expensive pet that usually dies.
And before anyone says "some company that makes pumps and skimmers can't do anything" they can - BRS canceled my entire order because they found out I live overseas and that's because the manufacturers demand it.
It's not that hard for them to have standards, have importers sign up to that and weed out the bad actors.
It's then much easier for our hobby to tell a positive story and harder to shut us down.