Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biota breeds all types of fish, same thing applies, why do you assume they need perpetual supply of wild fish instead of using their own spawns to breed? That $165 fish came down from higher prices as their breeding has gotten better, but facilities, consumables, etc still are priced into their pricing. As their supply andand processes get better, so do their prices.Your question is predicated on them just breeding only yellow tangs
I doubt that
They turned a $12 fish into a $165 fish. Remarkably so. And I love my Biota yellow tang. I'm going to get more
But, If they are not trying to breed $500+ fish right this minute, I would be amazed
I don’t care whether biota goes bankrupt or succeeds lol - but maybe go back and read why people like me had to jump in - because of ignorance statements that needed correcting.Yes exactly, the biota crew needs to go somewhere else
Second part,why do you assume they need perpetual supply of wild fish instead of using their own spawns to breed?
$165 is probably $40 more than what the wild fish would cost today. Look at Blue Regal Tangs, they were also the same $20-30 of 15 years ago the Yellow Tangs were. Now they’re $120 wild caught everywhere.I'm not here to argue with you. I am saying they have the market cornered on yellow tangs. And I don't think they are satisfied with just that, I wouldn't be if I were in that business
If the commies in Hawaii ever let yellow tangs out again, Biota will have to adjust their prices downward(they know this). I don't think they are resting on their laurals, as fresh and fine as they are right now
This is true but I think the point your missing is a small group of wild collected fish to produce thousands of offspring. Also helps with genetic diversity, bottlenecking, and additional research.Biota doesn’t even exists without a constant source of wild fish. You realize this yeah? Lol. Of course you don’t.
I usually only respond in forums when we're mentioned and try not to stray into commenting elsewhere. I'm happy to answer questions or comments directed at us/about us especially with so much misinformation, redirection, accusations, and others found in forums might as well get the information directly from the horse's mouth.Yes exactly, the biota crew needs to go somewhere else
It's always interesting to me when you look at the pricing of designer vs common clownfish being so far apart while the process is the same regardless of pattern. We do breed a range of easy to breed (gobies, damsels, ect. ) and hard to breed (tang, angels, perch) and the pricing reflects that.Have you even been to their store? I’d assume no since you assume all their fish are $500. They have lots of fish that start at $30 because guess what - they’re much easier to breed - do you not remember how much designer clowns were before they became trivial to breed?
That's not really how our pricing works. Much of our pricing is based on the cost of production. Prior to the closure we were selling yellow tang at this similar pricing and never raised the pricing to gouge the hobbyist, in fact we stopped selling to companies that did, and we haven't changed the pricing in years despite inflation rate (if we matched inflation the tang should be ~$180).If the commies in Hawaii ever let yellow tangs out again, Biota will have to adjust their prices downward(they know this). I don't think they are resting on their laurals, as fresh and fine as they are right now
The other livestock they sell are relatively competitive in pricing. If they can breed some $1000 dollars fish, they will sell it at $1100(or whatever). And have none of the issues necessitated by wild caught fish and importation.
This is a poor choice of words. Frustration or not, bad taste.If the commies in Hawaii
The other livestock they sell are relatively competitive in pricing. If they can breed some $1000 dollars fish, they will sell it at $1100(or whatever). And have none of the issues necessitated by wild caught fish and importation.
People will pay a premium for their animals, not just because of the hippie notion that it's "good", but because they are disease free, hardy, clean, and healthy
... But I guarantee once the wilds come back sales of these tank raised are going to virtually cease. ...
Would you like to air this out on this thread or? Maybe we can discuss this on the side or in a courtroom. Maybe even at the BLNR
I'm not trying to cause any animosity towards any company or industry. I've never denegrated sustainable wild collection in fact in podcasts, questions, and emails I've always stated sustainable wild collection is incredibly important because breeding has it's shortcomings. I've referenced specific species like moorish idols and similar species with long larval periods where it's not economically feasible to breed them and in those cases sustainable collection is necessary. That would be a case for this fishery specifically for various species of wrasse that have difficult larval rearing.The problem is Jake is how biota, a company from Palau, is the ONLY company given exclusive access to the fish like a monopoly while other, LOCAL companies/fishers that are from here, are denied outright to the resource. It’s troubling that because of this court ruling against the fishery, even Public AZA aquariums such as the Monterey Bay were not granted their access in the name of legitimate research and education while you guys play fast and loose with the law and oceanic institute.You are not research by definition in the eyes of the law, you are private sector selling fish on a reef forum. If BLNR fully understands you guys are private sector, which they will, we will see if they give you guys access.It’s deception. I’ve held my tongue as you and your most ardent defenders have constantly raided threads discussing the reopening of the most scientifically studied aquarium fishery in the world. This seems self serving and frankly kind of rude. But since you’re here maybe we should just have it out. I know quite a bit about Biota and the permit process here in Hawaii. I know quite a bit about the BLNR, the Special Activity Permits, the flimsy LOA you guys are using and most importantly, your dubious AFL status. Not all that glitters is gold and the more i look into Biota,I’m troubled by the ways you guys conduct business here in my home of Hawaii
Would you like to air this out on this thread or? Maybe we can discuss this on the side or in a courtroom. Maybe even at the BLNR
It was great speaking with you. I truly appreciate the information and conversation as well as your perspective on the fishery.Yes let’s chat
It was great speaking with you. I truly appreciate the information and conversation as well as your perspective on the fishery.
Why are wild caught Blue regal/hippos similarly priced as CB? Also why are they over $100 when they used to be $20 fifteen years ago and $60 5-10 years ago? If the ban was lifted, they wouldn’t be under $100, I can promise you that (as evident of all tangs that aren’t banned which are still over $100).This!
Unless the tank raised will be priced without the monopoly tax.
My Lfs regularly sells blue regals at $60, i would expect yellows to be around that price.Why are wild caught Blue regal/hippos similarly priced as CB? Also why are they over $100 when they used to be $20 fifteen years ago and $60 5-10 years ago? If the ban was lifted, they wouldn’t be under $100, I can promise you that (as evident of all tangs that aren’t banned which are still over $100).
very reasonable and likelyMy Lfs regularly sells blue regals at $60, i would expect yellows to be around that price.
All of the LFS here in CA, along with pretty much any online retailer you can search up, has them at $90-120 for a juvie (Harry’s Marine is $80 for a tiny one - best price I’ve found anywhere in CA).My Lfs regularly sells blue regals at $60, i would expect yellows to be around that price.
Why are wild caught Blue regal/hippos similarly priced as CB? Also why are they over $100 when they used to be $20 fifteen years ago and $60 5-10 years ago? If the ban was lifted, they wouldn’t be under $100, I can promise you that (as evident of all tangs that aren’t banned which are still over $100).