The only reason im answering this is because you asked - not to debate. I dont think he's lying.Why would a neurosurgeon lie about using Koch's Postulates? It just doesn’t make sense.
We can clearly see all the cultures he’s done. Maybe not all 500, but why would somebody who’s a Reefer himself lie about his findings? He would know that in time we’ll all find out. It just doesn’t make sense to me personally. That’s why we test things to find out if they’re true.
Either he’s the biggest liar on the planet and a money hungry person or he’s found something that works. Well, time will tell.
The problem is there is no way to prove that he used Kochs postulates without knowing the methods he used to do that. (i.e. he might have made an honest mistake). If you read the science on RTN WBD the main issue is separating bacteria from ciliates etc. If you have no way to document how that was done - you can't say that Koch's postulates were achieved.
This is not a slam against Prime Coral - this is just fact. Its extremely difficult to prove kochs postulates in the case of RTN because there are multifactorial causes. Again this is not a criticism of Prime Coral - its just that without knowing how it was done its impossible to analyze whether its correctly done or not - with all due respect to Dr. D.