Would you invest a grand for a KH Guardian?

Neptune

Would you invest a grand for a KH Guardian?


  • Total voters
    381

swk

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
783
Reaction score
392
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Wine Country CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My calcium reactor is so steady, and I test daily. So, for me 1000 is totally not worth it. 500 would be a different story entirely.

My main concerns in reading the site about the tech is that the old testing fluid gets flushed into the tank? That sketches me out.
 

Chris155hp

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
783
Reaction score
379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Miami, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I belive it calculates Alk from pH from the info Ive gathered similar to the midstream. Maybe we can get some clarification on this??? The system that Neptune acquired the rights to actually tests pH in a very similar process to the hanna checker, it just does it automatically and repeatedly.
 

Waterjockey

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
646
Reaction score
560
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I watch the video it says Ph is calculated by a Ph probe ? give PH swings throughout the day how does this remain accurate? my Ph swings 7.9-8.15 each day but my Kh is stable over that range?

If it is just a Ph calculation why are not controller company's just building in the calculation to determine Alk for us?

I haven't watched the video yet, but I suspect it is a typical alkalinity tritation. Which means you take a known sample volume, and titrate it with a standard acid solution until the PH is about 4.5. The amount of acid required is then used in a simple calculation to determine the amount of alkalinity. It has nothing to do with your tank's pH swing.
From a reef keeping viewpoint @Randy Holmes-Farley has published an article or two explaining how to diy alkalinity tests.
 

shoelaceike

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
1,061
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I agree completely. I lost every acan, 90% of my challice and SPS with value of over $15000. If I know a device like the KHG would have prevented the loss I would would not hesitate to pony up the $. I know for sure that I will not feel safe putting too much more money into the system till I have a Guardian.

Did something malfunction or just not dose enough?
 

eg8r210

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
733
Reaction score
298
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Minneola, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If Apex were the first to release this product, would you guys buy it ??!
Heck no, especially after the catastrophe Neptune had with their controller. This product, for every good thing it may do, has the opportunity to completely wipe out your tank in a day. Are you willing to let a first run Neptune product have the chance?
 

eschulist

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
352
Reaction score
799
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The monitor and dosing combined is pretty cool. But getting the alk value off of a pH probe instead of actual titration testing like Walsh's unit seems very imprecise. Now maybe that number doesn't really matter that much as long as it is monitoring it consistently. The true DKH might be off by .5 or even a whole value according to the unit. It may be set to 7.5 on the display but a accurate lab grade test says the water is actually 8.2 As long as the unit keeps the alkalinity stable at the value it thinks it is then it doesn't matter that much if its skewed up or down by a small amount.

If it is true that the unit is only using a ph probe why can't every controller already on the market run a similar calculation to derive DKH? Let the user then do whatever dosing method they choose to use.
 

Waterjockey

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
646
Reaction score
560
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The monitor and dosing combined is pretty cool. But getting the alk value off of a pH probe instead of actual titration testing like Walsh's unit seems very imprecise. Now maybe that number doesn't really matter that much as long as it is monitoring it consistently. The true DKH might be off by .5 or even a whole value according to the unit. It may be set to 7.5 on the display but a accurate lab grade test says the water is actually 8.2 As long as the unit keeps the alkalinity stable at the value it thinks it is then it doesn't matter that much if its skewed up or down by a small amount.

If it is true that the unit is only using a ph probe why can't every controller already on the market run a similar calculation to derive DKH? Let the user then do whatever dosing method they choose to use.

I suspect both use the same principle. The difference between calculating from your tank pH, and this, is it would take an exact size sample of water (like you do with any chemical test), and measure how much acid it takes to drop that sample to a pH of 4.5 (just like you do with any chemical test...this would use a pH probe instead of a colour changing reagent). From there, you can calculate dKh. You can't just calculate dkh from a pH probe in the tank.

While I am not 100% certain this is how either of the units work, from what I got from the video I strongly suspect that's how they do it
 

Carlos@CoralVue

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Messages
227
Reaction score
359
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Chicago, IL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How much will all these "standardized" stock solutions last? How much money will refills cost?

Sodium Bicarbonate is baking soda. It is cheap and you can get it at any grocery store or even Target sells food grade baking soda. If you want to get the stuff that they sell at BRS then you can use that. In terms of how long it will last, well, that has to do with your tank's needs. The more your demand, the more solution it will use.
 
Last edited:

Carlos@CoralVue

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Messages
227
Reaction score
359
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Chicago, IL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I suspect both use the same principle. The difference between calculating from your tank pH, and this, is it would take an exact size sample of water (like you do with any chemical test), and measure how much acid it takes to drop that sample to a pH of 4.5 (just like you do with any chemical test...this would use a pH probe instead of a colour changing reagent). From there, you can calculate dKh. You can't just calculate dkh from a pH probe in the tank.

While I am not 100% certain this is how either of the units work, from what I got from the video I strongly suspect that's how they do it

Someone has done their homework!!! :)
 

reefwiser

LMAS
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
7,531
Reaction score
9,514
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
Location
Louisville,Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

eltonw

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
96
Reaction score
45
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I suspect both use the same principle. The difference between calculating from your tank pH, and this, is it would take an exact size sample of water (like you do with any chemical test), and measure how much acid it takes to drop that sample to a pH of 4.5 (just like you do with any chemical test...this would use a pH probe instead of a colour changing reagent). From there, you can calculate dKh. You can't just calculate dkh from a pH probe in the tank.

While I am not 100% certain this is how either of the units work, from what I got from the video I strongly suspect that's how they do it

You are a smart guy!!!

if some one says he can do the similar device but not using these methods...he can just apply Nobel Prize.

We spend 4 years in quality improvemnt for this produt but not just spend few money and weeks then sell in the market.
 

eltonw

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
96
Reaction score
45
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

reef_ranch

Well-Known Member
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
817
Reaction score
1,096
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you read the articles Reefwiser posted you realize that building an accurate and precise alk monitor ain't easy. The the cost of designing and manufacturing this unit makes it worth every penny of $1,000. The question is are you willing to pay that? I wouldn't for the same reasons others have said -- its simply too much money to automate a process that takes me a few minutes to do. I would probably pay $500 and possibly a bit more for the peace of mind that continuous monitoring brings.
 

Waterjockey

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
646
Reaction score
560
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You are a smart guy!!!

if some one says he can do the similar device but not using these methods...he can just apply Nobel Prize.

We spend 4 years in quality improvemnt for this produt but not just spend few money and weeks then sell in the market.

Not that I am particularly smart. In industrial water treatment you do a similar titration for p-alkalinity, m-alkalinity ->OH alk. Just using indicators instead of a pH probe. Randy Holmes-Farley has published articles on how to do it for the home reefer.
The theory is simple...the devil is in the details. I appreciate how much work must be done to build a machine to do this consistant and reliably. Then tuning the rate/reset for calculating how much to dose based on the net change. There would have been a ton of work to take the method and automate it for the average home user. A two part package might sell better. Let the consumer buy the tester, and the dosing pump setup as an add-on for those that would want it to controll alk as well. I would be interested in the monitoring, not as much in the dosing controller for example.
 

reefwiser

LMAS
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
7,531
Reaction score
9,514
Review score
+1 /0 /-0
Location
Louisville,Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Everyone has to decide for ones self. There is alot of equipment to do this process. Three pumps a Ph probe and then a controller. So for the money it is fairly priced.
 
Neptune

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
NicerReefs. Your Reef. But Nicer.
Back
Top