You must have missed the link I posted on a method to determine erythromycin. Whether it is helpful or not - I don't know. However - I'll try to help and let me clarify my point.I care too. @MnFish1 - your involvement in the whole Vibrant thing started out poorly, continued to be poor and still is poor, that I can tell. This is like opening the same playbook. You can stay out of this one if you don't care or don't intend to help - I will catch you on the next one where you contribution can be good when you care or even care about other people caring. Everybody else should just ignore what is posted. This is all that I am going to add unless some skin is added to the game... and I mean actual skin and not just words.
I don't care if its erythromycin specifically, I care if its ANY antibiotic at all - as its my philosophy to not use antibiotics unless treating a known pathogen to a fish. So - all of the research in the world on erythromycin won't help if in fact it's tetracycline or some other antibiotic.
So one way you could experiment would be to obtain some agar plates, a gram-stain kit, a bacterial culture, and see whether chemiclean acts like an antibiotic. Now - common sense would suggest that it is an antibiotic (since it removes cyanobacteria). You can even grow cyanobacteria on agar (likely requiring a specific type)https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2513249/