Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All of the above is the correct answer!!!Bubble Gum? I'm looking for either a Bubble Gum (or Cosmic), Sun God, Black Panther, or Volcano or all of the above.
Hard disagree, CuC is absolutely a long term fix. It's all about creating a balanced eco system. Plenty of people get by with with high nutrient systems and no massive algae issues (myself included).cuc îs not a long term fix for green hair algae. You need to fix the root cause which is high nutrient to control algae outbreak. I would hire a plumber to replace faucet to install RODI as it is a must have for this hobby. I would also make sure to have a good size skimmer, do weekly water change, and add a UV sterilizer if you still have algae issue
I'm hoping to get a 100mm macro lens for my canon to take some awesome shots! Feel like all you guys manage way better pictures than me lolUgly pic - trying to show the pink coming back on the Caddy, but the SBB Orange Blast is FURRY fuzzy.
This is not a better picture... This is a 6 year old Motorola Z3 with no lenses or filters.I'm hoping to get a 100mm macro lens for my canon to take some awesome shots! Feel like all you guys manage way better pictures than me lol
More of a generalization than that specific pictureThis is not a better picture... This is a 6 year old Motorola Z3 with no lenses or filters.
It depends on what corals reefers want to keep. I am all about high end acro so high nutrient or nutrient spike has proven to be lethal for my acros. But I value your difference opinion and yes I have seen lots of tank thrive with high nutrientHard disagree, CuC is absolutely a long term fix. It's all about creating a balanced eco system. Plenty of people get by with with high nutrient systems and no massive algae issues (myself included).
I definitely don't disagree with your other points, i run a 90w UV and huge skimmer, and RODI with 0 tds has been proven to be an absolute must but the nutrients themselves part i don't necessarily agree with even for high end acro. Heck shane keeps his phosphates at what .2 and nitrates in the 20s if i remember? I have thriving high end acro at .1-.2 phosphates and 100+ nitrates!It depends on what corals reefers want to keep. I am all about high end acro so high nutrient or nutrient spike has proven to be lethal for my acros. But I value your difference opinion and yes I have seen lots of tank thrive with high nutrient
More nutrients just means you can push more flow and more light.I definitely don't disagree with your other points, i run a 90w UV and huge skimmer, and RODI with 0 tds has been proven to be an absolute must but the nutrients themselves part i don't necessarily agree with even for high end acro. Heck shane keeps his phosphates at what .2 and nitrates in the 20s if i remember? I have thriving high end acro at .1-.2 phosphates and 100+ nitrates!
100plus nitrate!!! I like to keep my nitrate that high so I can save $ on Nopox dosing. My 200gal takes 13ml Nopox a day to keep nitrate between 15-25. For phosphate I have GFO reactor and change out rowa phos every 10 days to keep phosphate below 0.15. I do run UV, reefmat and oversized skimmer. Your acro look great!I definitely don't disagree with your other points, i run a 90w UV and huge skimmer, and RODI with 0 tds has been proven to be an absolute must but the nutrients themselves part i don't necessarily agree with even for high end acro. Heck shane keeps his phosphates at what .2 and nitrates in the 20s if i remember? I have thriving high end acro at .1-.2 phosphates and 100+ nitrates!
I have 5 powerheads (3 mp40, 2 mp60), 1 gyre (xf250) and 2 returns! Always cool to see how different people find successMore nutrients just means you can push more flow and more light.
I find a lot of people blame their lights for their lack of success, but have two powerheads that don't do much but move water to the surface of the tank with no strong currents or flow around the corals themselves. I'm a strong proponent of coral respiration. Rubber bands holding a frag plug to a rack is a common thing in my tanks. The more flow, the more essential nutrients get to the polyps. This includes the skeletonizing nutrients as well, so, more flow, faster grow.
Increase the flow, then increase the light.
To nail that point home, Panda, how many water movers do you have in your tank, not counting your returns?
I can certainly relate on this one! I change my GFO twice a week on my 600g just to keep at that .1-.2 range and I run two large algae scrubbers on top of everything else. But aside from GFO and water changes i dont do any dosing!100plus nitrate!!! I like to keep my nitrate that high so I can save $ on Nopox dosing. My 200gal takes 13ml Nopox a day to keep nitrate between 15-25. For phosphate I have GFO reactor and change out rowa phos every 10 days to keep phosphate below 0.15. I do run UV, reefmat and oversized skimmer. Your acro look great!
My flow setup is very similar to yours, two gyre 330s, 2 mp40, 3 mp10, smaller tank, much less space, but overwhelming flow. I too keep high nutrients, and blast everything with lightI have 5 powerheads (3 mp40, 2 mp60), 1 gyre (xf250) and 2 returns! Always cool to see how different people find success
I'm at about flow capacity, i have pretty soft sand for my stingray and if i go too hard it turns into DUNE. So i try to keep it high but close to the top. Looks like its working for you!!My flow setup is very similar to yours, two gyre 330s, 2 mp40, 3 mp10, smaller tank, much less space, but overwhelming flow. I too keep high nutrients, and blast everything with light
Think its hard because feeding impacts nutrients, as well as nutrients trapped in rock/subtrate. Tracking the delta seems like it would be super challenging without automated equipment testing regularly but its a cool idea for sureCan you Calculate nutrient consumption just like alk consumption?
I wanna start dosing nitrate and phos but i dont really know where to start in terms of amount to dose especially brightwells formula supposedly isnt 100% accurateThink its hard because feeding impacts nutrients, as well as nutrients trapped in rock/subtrate. Tracking the delta seems like it would be super challenging without automated equipment testing regularly but its a cool idea for sure