As far as addressing the issue, I think they have done a heck of a lot with both their stands and tank construction. I don't know enough to give a reasoned opinion on what they did to pre-empt failures although surely offering a retrofit is exactly that? Can you elaborate as to what is the 'breadth of the issue' ?I think a lot of the consensus is that they did very little to address the issue or pre-empt failures if they knew it was an issue. And furthermore, they did the bare minimum to compensate those affected and nothing to those potentially affected except offer a retrofit that does not actually appear to address the breadth of the issue. At least that is what I see and not people jumping on a bandwagon.
Finally, please excuse my pessimism. I'm from the UK and while we have inherited many beneficial things from the US over the last few decades, the propensity for litigious recourse is not one of them.