Hanging your hat on one amateur " study"?
There was the " coral labs" study that is ignored..
Soo do you have the measurements and standard deviations?
Not talking about me. Just the gp and what brs said..
Btw historically best has been pretty pro mh and t5.
They dumped both when neither were selling well and just taking up $$$$ space.
That IS how capitalism work.
Sold lots of bulbs though.
I don’t recall “hanging” my hat on one “amateur” study. I am suggesting the evidence base is limited and what Andrew did is the closest I’ve seen to a controlled experiment, unless I am missing something? I do research/machine learning/deep learning for a living and am pretty careful with what I would classify as a study. Andrew did not conduct a study to my knowledge, he unintentionally or intentionally mimicked components of one though. I don’t recall Andrew taking growth measurements. He simply observed faster growth and better color. I don’t think there is anything wrong with being skeptical of his findings, perhaps maybe he is lying? I don’t see why he would lie or the motivation behind that, but that’s ok. It sounds like for you to believe him though you would need some growth measurements wrapped in confidence intervals. I wager even if he has those you might be disturbed and want more.
Can you send me the coral labs study? Does it compare growth rates between MH and Led in a semi controlled environment? Who conducted the study? Is this the Ecotech project? I’d like to check it out. I’m all for seeing evidence contrary to what Andrew observed. I haven’t seen it yet.
Yea, I agree BRS sold lots of bulbs. Selling lots of LEDs now…I’m waiting and saving up for that gen25 to be released.