You know that do you. The will is embedded in their genetics in fact all animals have it including humans. A will by anyother name.Fish don't have "a will to survive". They don't have a will at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know that do you. The will is embedded in their genetics in fact all animals have it including humans. A will by anyother name.Fish don't have "a will to survive". They don't have a will at all.
Yes, I do know that. Instinct and will are not the same. Fish and other lower vertebrates have no "will", emotions, or any of the other things you're attributing to them. They respond to basic fight/flight/freeze stressors and that's about it. It's threat or no threat, that's what they "feel".You know that do you. The will is embedded in their genetics in fact all animals have it including humans. A will by anyother name.
Yes, I do know that. Instinct and will are not the same. Fish and other lower invertebrates have no "will", emotions, or any of the other things you're attributing to them. They respond to basic fight/flight/freeze stressors and that's about it. It's threat or no threat, that's what they "feel".
Fish absolutely don't "recognize their reflection". In fact, placing a mirror against the glass is a method to stop an aggressive fish from targeting tank-mates since it becomes focused on the "other" fish (its reflection) and keeping an eye on it. If the fish saw the reflection as itself, it would not work.Quote
"More than all of this, fish are sentient (they have feelings!)
It's clear to us that fishes are sentient beings, meaning that they're individuals, capable of experiencing pain and feeling emotions such as fear. Did you know that fishes who are hooked by an angler will try to avoid returning to the area where it happened? This suggests that they felt pain and don't want a repeat experience...
Fishes are also likely to be capable of experiencing positive emotions too - many people who look after pet fish report seeing fishes playing in bubble streams or swimming up to the water surface to 'greet' them when they approach.
Evidence for fishes being sentient also comes from the 'mirror self-recognition test'. This test involves placing a mirror in front of the animal to see whether they recognise their reflections as themselves, or see them just as 'another animal'.
Manta rays and cleaner wrasses can pass this test - something only a handful of all animals have been found to do. Although failing the test does not rule out the possibility that the animal is sentient, the fact that some fishes can pass the test is strong evidence that they're sentient and self-aware."
...and this has nothing to do with the fact that they have learned we feed them...many people who look after pet fish report seeing fishes playing in bubble streams or swimming up to the water surface to 'greet' them when they approach.
It's clear to us
Um, yes, no one has suggested that fish don't feel pain or cannot learn... but applying a human emotion to positive or negative reactions to stimuli is silly.Did you know that fishes who are hooked by an angler will try to avoid returning to the area where it happened? This suggests that they felt pain and don't want a repeat experience...
I can think of many occasions of fish I've caught and released going right back to where they were.....and come take a bait or fly minutes later to be caught again.It's clear to us that fishes are sentient beings, meaning that they're individuals, capable of experiencing pain and feeling emotions such as fear. Did you know that fishes who are hooked by an angler will try to avoid returning to the area where it happened?
Atoll is a friend of mine and if he posts a thread about something I am not particularly interested in, I don't go on it and I am sure he doesn't read many of my very opinionated threads.Unless atoll starts breaking into people's houses and dropping anemones in their clown tanks (you aren't doing that, right? ), what's the harm? I'd much rather read a thread that presents a question (I know he didn't ask. The question is obvious ) AND a response, because it seems to give the rest of the discussion more focus.
I know Atoll and he would never call a puffer a goat. Cow, maybe......Duck Billed Platypus or Aardvark,Atoll is entitled to his feelings and opinions and if he calls a Puffer a goat, I accept that.
I know Atoll and he would never call a puffer a goat. Cow, maybe......Duck Billed Platypus or Aardvark,
Never.
Most people in the US don't know where Wales UK is but think "Wales" live in the sea and eat shrimp or the occasional anchovy.It's a forum with people I have never met probably never will, most don't know me
Its a fish with normal behavior. . . .Putting jokes to the sideWhat's a puffer?
If someone gets rattled over a complete strangers rant, then maybe reading posts aren't conducive to a happy life... see what I did there?? Hehe
If the crazy hair brain rants of a guy like Paul doesn't rattle your cage, I think you're safe to continue reading posts. He should be the litmus test.
I’ve met people over here who never knew wales existed, I feel sorry for some people who taught them in schools…Most people in the US don't know where Wales UK is but think "Wales" live in the sea and eat shrimp or the occasional anchovy.