I always thought it meant the clowns showed the anemone to it's reserved table, brought breadsticks, and checked up on it's meal satisfaction right at the moment it had a mouthful of food.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I always thought it meant the clowns showed the anemone to it's reserved table, brought breadsticks, and checked up on it's meal satisfaction right at the moment it had a mouthful of food.
Do we have concrete evidence of this as in a scientific paper on clownfish or other to support your claims? I put up one such a little while back published by the RSPCA here in the UK. I think clownfish have a lot more going for them than we give them credit for.I think you're all convoluting Sentience with Sapience. The clownfish does not debate whether it flees, or fights, it does so by nervous response. There is no internal dialogue there which would indicate volition or motive. Self Preservation is, indeed, an instinct. A clownfish fleeing danger is no more an active decision than a flinch or a sneeze.
Are you sure that's a condy anemone doesn't look like one to me
I think the autonomic nature of the 'fight or flight' response is beyond debate at this point. There are peer reviewed studies on it dating back to before it's official description by Cannon in 1915.Lo
Do we have concrete evidence of this as in a scientific paper on clownfish or other to support your claims? I put up one such a little while back published by the RSPCA here in the UK. I think clownfish have a lot more going for them than we give them credit for.
Struggling to find that one again, not sure exactly what I put in Google to find it. I will continue to search however.I think the autonomic nature of the 'fight or flight' response is beyond debate at this point. There are peer reviewed studies on it dating back to before it's official description by Cannon in 1915.
Alas I could not find your publication, although I would fancy a good read of it. I invite you to PM me a link to it.
I think the autonomic nature of the 'fight or flight' response is beyond debate at this point. There are peer reviewed studies on it dating back to before it's official description by Cannon in 1915.
Alas I could not find your publication, although I would fancy a good read of it. I invite you to PM me a link to it.
Again, that's sentience.Struggling to find that one again, not sure exactly what I put in Google to find it. I will continue to search however.
I did stumble on the following during my search.
Fish Have Feelings, Too
Fish have emotions, social needs, and intelligence. Meet scientists exploring the inner lives of our aquatic friends.www.pbs.org
Nope, I do not.You don't think the clownfish has a conscious desire to avoid being eaten and It recognising the danger and takes avoiding action to do so?
Quote "
will to survive the determination to live in spite of an adverse situation (e.g., a severe illness or disabling disorder) or extreme conditions (e.g., lack of food and water or long-term or harsh imprisonment). Also called will to live.
APA Dictionary of Psychology
dictionary.apa.org/will-to-survive
Thank you!Again, that's sentience.
Sapience is what I take issue with, which would be the willing, conscious, and self-aware actions which are often misattributed to animals.
Current studies show very few truly sapient animals. Ravens being most notable, humans being of questionable quality in that arena.
This is a blog post, not anything even REMOTELY resembling researchJust found the origional copy and paste I put up. Here's the link
Fishes have feelings too: diving into fish myths and setting the record straight - RSPCA
Fishes have feelings too: diving into fish myths and setting the record straightwww.rspca.org.uk
That was not a scientific paper/article on ANY sense of the word!! It was a blog post!Lo
Do we have concrete evidence of this as in a scientific paper on clownfish or other to support your claims? I put up one such a little while back published by the RSPCA here in the UK. I think clownfish have a lot more going for them than we give them credit for.
We have been there before many many times and I have never said my tank or any other is natural only that I try and make it as natural as reasonably possible. This is what happens when people fail to read all the thread or ar least my posts and answers. BTW We also have a duty of care with our animals.So not to dive into everything, but in a very broad statement..... if you are taking anything and putting it in a tank vs leaving it in the ocean, I kinda don't think you can preach "oh well you need to make a natural habitat" because natural would mean to make an ocean for them..... like millions of gallons and tide changes and moon phases and keep up with pollution and blaaaa. but i think to bash anyone who comes to a forum to ask "is this ok for my parameters" is not only hypocritical, but very toxic to the community. This coming from someone who has a nem/clown only tank... Most captive bred clowns have never seen a nem, and therefore might not take to them. and thats ok. I am a huge advocate of captive bred everything (if possible) to help sustain the oceans in any way possible. I get you're overall opinion of making natural habitats, but that literally not possible, unless you want to leave everything in the ocean..... in the ocean.
And the other 2 you don't mention?That was not a scientific paper/article on ANY sense of the word!! It was a blog post!
Theye don't experience stress then either? Fine, a view we don't share.Nope, I do not.
I’m curious on what you’d say a ‘natural’ tank looks like?I have never said my tank or any other is natural only that I try and make it as natural as reasonably possible.
I’m curious on what you’d say a ‘natural’ tank looks like?
Is it something that mimics a reef and exactly like what you’d see in a specific area in the world or is it a reef with everything originating from one specific spot (E.g. Indonesia) with even the rockwork looking like something you’d find in that area?
A clownfish doesn't have a conscious anything. It doesn't have the brain structures necessary for consciousness.You don't think the clownfish has a conscious desire to avoid being eaten and It recognising the danger and takes avoiding action to do so?
"Fish are conscious" is a claim that would need a LOT of high quality evidence - it's not her job to disprove it - it's your job to prove that claim.Lo
Do we have concrete evidence of this as in a scientific paper on clownfish or other to support your claims? I put up one such a little while back published by the RSPCA here in the UK. I think clownfish have a lot more going for them than we give them credit for.
But I made the claims origionally and as yet nobody has come up with anything to disprove mine. No scientific paper which I have asked for. I did provide links to backup my claim. Where are the ones disproving them, I would have thought people would have done so.A clownfish doesn't have a conscious anything. It doesn't have the brain structures necessary for consciousness.
"Fish are conscious" is a claim that would need a LOT of high quality evidence - it's not her job to disprove it - it's your job to prove that claim.
Sentient basically just means "reacts to stimuli" - clams are sentient. Snails are sentient. Of course fish are sentient. It has nothing to do with consciousness - that's Sapience. Sapience isn't just self recognition - it's about abstract thought and generalization. There's no evidence that any fish are even close (but some debate about a couple molluscs)