Team
venture into the general forum and do a search under nitrite posts, stalled cycle posts see today's trending.
Nitrite is a hot hot hot hot hot button topic, you have reef business owners posting in the threads, directors of massive reef supplement companies, you have Dan and Taricha, two of our board's most up and coming chemists posting on measures and sampling and nitrite impacts
you see aquaculturists posting, 50+ years experience in aquaculture, passionate advocates of nitrite testing and full wait for compliance before reefing, the nitrite posts you can see are numbering in the hundreds of pages we can clearly read.
Sample those threads, look at the dangers foretold by skipping nitrite testing, compare that to our results
Do you see how in reefing, anything concerning a cycle is consequence-laden information? Read their threads, there's stated bigtime consequence all down the biochemical pathway for ignoring nitrite, fish disease claims, there's a price stated for noncompliance.
How does our thread align with that?
Do you see how when building massive claims threads around written paragraphs, everyone gets a say on the rules and strong writers are angling in consequences that look real on paper, in formulas, but when you build a massive thread solely around other peoples tanks and we get pics, and follow ups, the consequences aren't found? See how there's accountability when using other people's reef tanks to make proofs, and when that's omitted, there's 200 pages of opinion and commuted fear/bad outcome?
we will never need to know nitrite in this thread, and you can tell by patterning on page 200 the outcomes will be the same as they are here on the current page. We're dealing in true pattern science as we explore updated cycling science.
old cycling science = lol you will be buying bottle bac and waiting until the cows come home for permitted action, and then all the fish die anyway in March because nobody is telling readers about fish disease risks as the absolute fundamental risk in all tank cycling. Want to see real consequence vs puffery? see any post in today's fish disease forum posts.
*I subscribe to Dan and T's posts and follow their writing. They do not hype, they study effects on biofiltration and don't try and sway posters one way or another, true chemists. When they post on nitrite I dont find it controversial, I find it illuminating. Their posts are commonly charts, graphs they made, and chemistry experiments not from 1978 but from last week using today's best lab gear, check 'em and see.
anyone beyond Dan or Taricha or Randy I don't accept their input on nitrite due to conflicts of interest and more often not a single work thread ever made.
venture into the general forum and do a search under nitrite posts, stalled cycle posts see today's trending.
Nitrite is a hot hot hot hot hot button topic, you have reef business owners posting in the threads, directors of massive reef supplement companies, you have Dan and Taricha, two of our board's most up and coming chemists posting on measures and sampling and nitrite impacts
you see aquaculturists posting, 50+ years experience in aquaculture, passionate advocates of nitrite testing and full wait for compliance before reefing, the nitrite posts you can see are numbering in the hundreds of pages we can clearly read.
Sample those threads, look at the dangers foretold by skipping nitrite testing, compare that to our results
Do you see how in reefing, anything concerning a cycle is consequence-laden information? Read their threads, there's stated bigtime consequence all down the biochemical pathway for ignoring nitrite, fish disease claims, there's a price stated for noncompliance.
How does our thread align with that?
Do you see how when building massive claims threads around written paragraphs, everyone gets a say on the rules and strong writers are angling in consequences that look real on paper, in formulas, but when you build a massive thread solely around other peoples tanks and we get pics, and follow ups, the consequences aren't found? See how there's accountability when using other people's reef tanks to make proofs, and when that's omitted, there's 200 pages of opinion and commuted fear/bad outcome?
we will never need to know nitrite in this thread, and you can tell by patterning on page 200 the outcomes will be the same as they are here on the current page. We're dealing in true pattern science as we explore updated cycling science.
old cycling science = lol you will be buying bottle bac and waiting until the cows come home for permitted action, and then all the fish die anyway in March because nobody is telling readers about fish disease risks as the absolute fundamental risk in all tank cycling. Want to see real consequence vs puffery? see any post in today's fish disease forum posts.
*I subscribe to Dan and T's posts and follow their writing. They do not hype, they study effects on biofiltration and don't try and sway posters one way or another, true chemists. When they post on nitrite I dont find it controversial, I find it illuminating. Their posts are commonly charts, graphs they made, and chemistry experiments not from 1978 but from last week using today's best lab gear, check 'em and see.
anyone beyond Dan or Taricha or Randy I don't accept their input on nitrite due to conflicts of interest and more often not a single work thread ever made.
Last edited: