Have stopped. But what would it do if I dosed it?Stop using vibrant, don't dose trace elements and take it one day at a time. Continue with syphon and cleaning routine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have stopped. But what would it do if I dosed it?Stop using vibrant, don't dose trace elements and take it one day at a time. Continue with syphon and cleaning routine.
There are carbon sources in it whichh will help fuel the blighters.Have stopped. But what would it do if I dosed it?
Ah, so with nopox I must have been really fueling them then?There are carbon sources in it whichh will help fuel the blighters.
Sorry for the very basic question but as I understand it, the risk of bottom out on NO3 and PO4 is the loss of a diverse bacterial population through starvation and an environment that allows dinoflagellates to thrive.
Dosing of those 2 nutrients using whatever pure source is done to bring back the [microbial] population and the algae that will outcompete[, eat and displace] the dinoflagellates and reverse the situation. Is this a valid premise?
Also does the premise that a healthy tank is running around 5-10ppm NO3 and ~0.1 PO4 directly fly in the face of ULNS? I was working the tank in that direction using AF products in the hopes of reversing the few SPS that are browning in my tank. Again thank you
It sounds likely you are not sure which it is yet. The first post has a link to a test you can perform to see if it is dinos or diatoms. I did it myself and it's pretty easy. The treatment for those two are different so check before you take action. Let us know what you find out.
I agree I am not certain and will try the coffee filter test. Being that the tank is 5 years old I would think it would be odd to see a diatom bloom. Correct me if I am wrong.
I agree. ID would benefit most in this circumstance. His po4 is relatively high but no3 is low. This is something I experienced with Coolia. Similar possibility? I would hate to see it again.Let alone an "old" tank that appears to have pleanty of dissolved nutrients available.
I would not jump to any more conclusions until you get a chance to do one of the ID methods.
I agree. ID would benefit most in this circumstance. His po4 is relatively high but no3 is low. This is something I experienced with Coolia. Similar possibility? I would hate to see it again.
You think the no3 is low at around .15 to .25. I figured that is considered relatively high??
Fwew. Honestly, I didn't know how to approach that question lol.Sorry that should of read 15 to 25 ppm NO3 not .15 to .25 ppm.
Sorry for the confusion.
Fwew. Honestly, I didn't know how to approach that question lol.
The growth is even more confusing now. What kind of RO system are you using?
First, I would look into test reports from your local water provider. This is something I did and found my cities water supply is using chloramines. Chloramines are difficult to remove. I upped my 4 stage to a 6 stage with dual 1 micron carbon blocks and dual color changing DI filters. In your case, full filter replacement may be warranted unless provided city water supply reports show a positive on chloramines. Then additional filtration would help. Chloramines will kill microbials.This is the RO filter system I am using. Just got it in early October.
http://www.reefsupplies.ca/online-store/CSPDI-90GPD-w-Manual-Membrane-Flush-by-Spectrapure.html
So a 4 stage unit. The tds reading says 1 on the output. It did say 0 in the beginning but as of about a month or so ago it does say 1. So I guess there is a possibility I am feeding the dinos silicate. And thus I should change the filter cartridges.
Let me know your thoughts.
Are you leveling the scoop flat?1 scoop of component B
Perfect!Yup scoop leveling flat.
I just looked at the city website and found this.
6. UV Disinfectant of the water with chlorine is a way to protect public health from disease causing organisms that can be found in the river. The risk to public health is reduced further by treatment with ultraviolet (UV) light. Before the water leaves the treatment plant, we combine the chlorine with ammonia to form chloramine. This reduces the formation of disinfection by-products, and ensures a long-lasting "residual" to protect our water against bacteria or other organisms on its journey to your home tap. The chemicals Ammonium and Fluoride (see Chemicals Used D.) are added after the UV Disinfectant stage, before the water is pumped to the storage reservoirs.
So it looks like chloramines are at play.
No, dinos are fairly resistent. Resilient little ......I do have a media bag with some carbon in the tank as we speak as I just got done the chemiclean treatment for the Cyano which it did wipe out on the rocks anyways. So the chloramines could be fueling the dinos?? Or are these seperate problems.
Also can I daisy chain another media reactor to my RO unit so I don't have to buy a whole new unit or will that not work??