nicely said.
regarding the living fish, my claims for that come from seneye studies where we tracked total safety, nh3 instantly controlled in the thousandths (which is the outcome of all wait cycles) and even fish-in cycles showed the same rates.
free ammonia was just as easily controlled instantly from bottles tested as it was after 3 months of wait and lead up.
the fear of harm to fish by fish+bottle bac and no wait cycling is 100% overstated. we have a huge thread studying them, with multiple seneye owners stating their results.
it is patently amazing we can't find one single example of quick losses in a cycling setup with fish, anyway we slice it, even after asking an entire forum for only one proof from any era logged online. one would think there'd at least be ten searchable examples, theres been over half a million cycles logged for sure. To think that many fish are burned by a practice means some needed to finish the spiral into total loss, I can't find any instances of that other than delayed disease issues
and the fish eat, swim normally, in clean water for days that doesnt smell. How we can project fish harm from those patterns escapes me.
we can't find any seneyes that are tuned and calibrated showing harm to fish by zero wait cycling from a bottle, and we can't find a single example of nitrite stalling ammonia control as well.
tuned/calibrated seneye means on a matured reef the seneye runs .002-.009 which matches oceanic study data for nh3 rates in clean reefs. no number sticks and holds; the change is constant within this range and that matches metabolic expectations in a fed + respiring reef.
then the owner moves that same unit/slide into a qt setup, low surface area, nh3 rises and stays in the hundredths.
then when he (Jon M in our thread) moves that same seneye and slide into a brand new all white rock and sand tank + bottle bac, that setup instantly shows the initial ammonia spike and then back down all the way to .001
there is no test kit for nh3 in reefing that can show that accuracy, among 100 testers, its why I believe tuned seneyes over titration kits.
we need a hach nh3 meter vs seneye octagon showdown, I'd ppv that for fifty bucks
regarding the living fish, my claims for that come from seneye studies where we tracked total safety, nh3 instantly controlled in the thousandths (which is the outcome of all wait cycles) and even fish-in cycles showed the same rates.
free ammonia was just as easily controlled instantly from bottles tested as it was after 3 months of wait and lead up.
the fear of harm to fish by fish+bottle bac and no wait cycling is 100% overstated. we have a huge thread studying them, with multiple seneye owners stating their results.
it is patently amazing we can't find one single example of quick losses in a cycling setup with fish, anyway we slice it, even after asking an entire forum for only one proof from any era logged online. one would think there'd at least be ten searchable examples, theres been over half a million cycles logged for sure. To think that many fish are burned by a practice means some needed to finish the spiral into total loss, I can't find any instances of that other than delayed disease issues
and the fish eat, swim normally, in clean water for days that doesnt smell. How we can project fish harm from those patterns escapes me.
we can't find any seneyes that are tuned and calibrated showing harm to fish by zero wait cycling from a bottle, and we can't find a single example of nitrite stalling ammonia control as well.
tuned/calibrated seneye means on a matured reef the seneye runs .002-.009 which matches oceanic study data for nh3 rates in clean reefs. no number sticks and holds; the change is constant within this range and that matches metabolic expectations in a fed + respiring reef.
then the owner moves that same unit/slide into a qt setup, low surface area, nh3 rises and stays in the hundredths.
then when he (Jon M in our thread) moves that same seneye and slide into a brand new all white rock and sand tank + bottle bac, that setup instantly shows the initial ammonia spike and then back down all the way to .001
there is no test kit for nh3 in reefing that can show that accuracy, among 100 testers, its why I believe tuned seneyes over titration kits.
we need a hach nh3 meter vs seneye octagon showdown, I'd ppv that for fifty bucks
Last edited: