Could we utilise the Redfield ratio a little better in aquaria?

[areefer01]

"end the conversation here"???

Even the report feature for the thread didn't work.

 

[twentyleagues]

13 pages and you know what I learned?
That people are willing to argue just to argue. ( I actually knew that already)

 

[Hats_]

Heterotrophic Protozoa does. Their population is dependent on the availability of Nitrate, Phosphate and DOC in the form of a carbohydrate. Not acetic acid or etanol

dude just stop, admit you have no clue on the subject matter and you are in over your head

 

[GARRIGA]

13 pages and you know what I learned?
That people are willing to argue just to argue. ( I actually knew that already)

Sad but true...

 

[sixty_reefer]

dude just stop, admit you have no clue on the subject matter and you are in over your head

As I mentioned earlier testing will determine if I’m wrong or not.
Does your company makes reef supplements is that one of the reasons that education or forms of carbon is not allowed?
I do have my theory and I will do the tests it’s just as it is in the hobby all the time, if it doesn’t work then all admit it was a waste of time.

 

[Hats_]

As I mentioned earlier testing will determine if I’m wrong or not.
Does your company makes reef supplements is that one of the reasons that education or forms of carbon is not allowed?
I do have my theory and I will do the tests it’s just as it is in the hobby all the time, if it doesn’t work then all admit it was a waste of time.

what are you even talking about? my company?

 

[BeanAnimal]

Heterotrophic Protozoa does. Their population is dependent on the availability of Nitrate, Phosphate and DOC in the form of a carbohydrate. Not acetic acid or etanol.

This is all starting to make sense.

You fell in way over your head (first post) and since have tried to use reference materials to provide the answers to questions and points made by those responding to you. What baffles me is that at this point you are still trying to fake your way into some form of reasonable conclusion where you are not "wrong".

Do you see a point in carrying on discussing biogeochemistry topics?

FWIW - while it has been obvious all along, this is where you really jumped the shark and it became obvious that you were responding from a thesaurus and search engine instead of a position of knowledge.

That gives me pause and I have to wonder if you understand the damage that nonsense like this does to community credentials like those in your profile?

I don't think anybody here is trying to clown you are be mean and the responses have been very cordial given the context. But, at this point maybe just give us all a thumbs up and walk away with some dignity left?

 

[Hats_]

This is all starting to make sense.

You fell in way over your head (first post) and since have tried to use reference materials to provide the answers to questions and points made by those responding to you. What baffles me is that at this point you are still trying to fake your way into some form of reasonable conclusion where you are not "wrong".


FWIW - while it has been obvious all along, this is where you really jumped the shark and it became obvious that you were responding from a thesaurus and search engine instead of a position of knowledge.

That gives me pause and I have to wonder if you understand the damage that nonsense like this does to community credentials like those in your profile?

I don't think anybody here is trying to clown you are be mean and the responses have been very cordial given the context. But, at this point maybe just give us all a thumbs up and walk away with some dignity left?

I did wonder about those community credentials so i looked at his profile and a couple years back he posted an article about the same topic and recieved similar reviews to what this thread consists of (no surprises there)

Can you just get those banners under your profile if you ask or something?

 

[sixty_reefer]

This is all starting to make sense.

You fell in way over your head (first post) and since have tried to use reference materials to provide the answers to questions and points made by those responding to you. What baffles me is that at this point you are still trying to fake your way into some form of reasonable conclusion where you are not "wrong".


FWIW - while it has been obvious all along, this is where you really jumped the shark and it became obvious that you were responding from a thesaurus and search engine instead of a position of knowledge.

That gives me pause and I have to wonder if you understand the damage that nonsense like this does to community credentials like those in your profile?

I don't think anybody here is trying to clown you are be mean and the responses have been very cordial given the context. But, at this point maybe just give us all a thumbs up and walk away with some dignity left?

I didn’t ask for any of those badges they were given to me.
The R2R Research was given to me by a similar heated argument and in testing I was luckily proven right. Leaving hundreds of disappointed folks. Just saying

 

[Hats_]

This is the third time and last time I'll ask this @sixty_reefer do you have a background in marine bio or something similar? Or are you just a hobbyist?

 

[sixty_reefer]

This is the third time and last time I'll ask this @sixty_reefer do you have a background in marine bio or something similar? Or are you just a hobbyist?

I don’t believe my background is relevant for this discussion or any other discussion, from here i’ll go to testing, if there is any interest i’ll make it live and public, if not, it will not make any difference to me, I will gain the information I want anyhow.

 

[14 foot reef]

is it possible to remove yourself from a thread, if so, boy is this the perfect thread to run like 4ell from !!!

 

[Hats_]

I don’t believe my background is relevant for this discussion or any other discussion, from here i’ll go to testing, if there is any interest i’ll make it live and public, if not, it will not make any difference to me, I will gain the information I want anyhow.

I believe it does since you act like you have some authority on the subject and those banners make it look like it

 

[rtparty]

is it possible to remove yourself from a thread, if so, boy is this the perfect thread to run like 4ell from !!!

One of the best things I’ve ever done is make it so I don’t automatically “watch” threads I reply in

That way I ignore 99% of the nonsense on here unless I really want to watch the train crash

 

[14 foot reef]

One of the best things I’ve ever done is make it so I don’t automatically “watch” threads I reply in

That way I ignore 99% of the nonsense on here unless I really want to watch the train crash

This train crashed burned down two adjoining towns and killed thousands of innocent reefers.

 

[rtparty]

This train crashed burned down two adjoining towns and killed thousands of innocent reefers.

1 Train
16 houses
106 innocent reefers

It all tracks!

 

[sixty_reefer]

I believe it does since you act like you have some authority on the subject and those banners make it look like it

What’s the problem with the banners, still not following. You should only be worried if a “expert” banner was up there. The two you taking issue with were given to me by merit.

 

[Spare time]

Every time I come back to this thread I am more and more lost lol

 

[sixty_reefer]

Every time I come back to this thread I am more and more lost lol

That is the purpose of the constant spamming of some users, most likely sponsored by companies.
There has been a movement for some time to disrupt any conversation that envolves the use of carbohydrates in reef aquaria. Most likely due to this being the main ingredient in many shelf products designed for reef improvement.
I’ve mentioned several times that I can prove the concept.
Although it seems at the moment the issue are my banners.

 

[GARRIGA]

I'm curious to see the results of the experiments. Evolution comes from trying something different then adaptation.