What is missing? All-for-Reef vs changing water.

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Top Shelf Aquatics

biom

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 8, 2015
Messages
555
Reaction score
376
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Bulgaria
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The corals from my avatar were growing in a system with no water changes. Still I am sure they would grow even faster with some water changes. Just saying keeping nice reef with no water changes is possible but doing water changes is much easier and safe way of reef keeping for the average reefer.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
www.dinkinsaquaticgardens.com

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,250
Reaction score
1,916
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I also thought about the dilution theory. The cause why I don't use this explanation in first line is the following: When I do a 10 to 15 % water change, 85 to 90 % of the detrimental compounds are still in the tank. Is this dilution to 85 to 90 % enough to make a visible difference? Maybe if there is a kind of threshold, for example an inhibitory effect of some kind of organics to calcium carbonate precipitation.

Another possible explanation is the trace elements theory. Maybe the additive is optimizing some trace elements while others are not optimized. The missing trace elements are supplemented by water changes. This could also explain the results I see.

So I am still open to any idea. Maybe I will come to a conviction some day ... :D
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I also thought about the dilution theory. The cause why I don't use this explanation in first line is the following: When I do a 10 to 15 % water change, 85 to 90 % of the detrimental compounds are still in the tank. Is this dilution to 85 to 90 % enough to make a visible difference? Maybe if there is a kind of threshold, for example an inhibitory effect of some kind of organics to calcium carbonate precipitation.

Another possible explanation is the trace elements theory. Maybe the additive is optimizing some trace elements while others are not optimized. The missing trace elements are supplemented by water changes. This could also explain the results I see.

So I am still open to any idea. Maybe I will come to a conviction some day ... :D

Those small bits removed add up for things that are long lasting (and maybe slow building) in the tank.

This is a sort of generic math model of what can happen to anything that starts at 100 (any units), and slowly accumulates with no water changes, or declines with 7.5, 15, and 30% monthly water changes. The effect after a few months can be quite dramatic.

1683122950346.png
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,250
Reaction score
1,916
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Those small bits removed add up for things that are long lasting (and maybe slow building) in the tank.

This is a sort of generic math model of what can happen to anything that starts at 100 (any units), and slowly accumulates with no water changes, or declines with 7.5, 15, and 30% monthly water changes. The effect after a few months can be quite dramatic.

View attachment 3133698
I have used such a calculation and the resulting saw tooth diagramm in one of my early articles around 28 years ago. :)

It was just upside down compared to yours and showed how trace elements concentrations could drop without and with water changes. It also showed that water changes can't compensate for heavy trace elements consumptions, except the salt has overconcentrations of these trace elements.
 

roggy23

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
485
Reaction score
108
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think I have a theory. I had the exact similar happen when I was just doing all for reef. I was missing something as my montipora caps were dull and not doing good. ( I had no acropora yet ). I started a new method called reef moonshiners which I still do with all for reef. The main difference I think what all for reef really lacked for me was iodine. It came back zero and I started to dose this daily my montipora looked great. I would notice large water changes also fixed the montipora which is similar to what you’re saying. But now I don’t do water changes. Well 10 gallons a month on a 140 total to clean sand. My tank stays great but mainly I’m dosing iodine daily now. For this reason I think all for reef and reef moon shiners method is perfect which most don’t do. I haven’t found any minor elements to be too high only too low which I dose and correct via reef moonshiner.
How much iodine do you dose daily?
 

christwendt

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
828
Reaction score
428
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
How much iodine do you dose daily?
Iodine is tricky to dial in. With reef moonshiners you go by drops and test then adjust drops. So I’m currently at 9 drops daily of sea Chem reef iodide. This maintained 40 iodine on icp test. I’m shooting for 80 iodine on icp. So I may be upping to like 12 drops daily when I get my next results back. Iodine is best dosed daily so you don’t get giant fluctuations. This is for a 140 total tank volume.
 

christwendt

Well-Known Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
828
Reaction score
428
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
ICP based testing and dosing is a fine method, IMO, but I think it being perfect is an exaggeration. There are limitations to ICP testing (accuracy, lack of chemical speciation, detection limits, etc.) which make it a bit less than perfect, not even considering the costs.
I do get perfect is a hard to use word. Nothing is perfect in this world. However I’m keeping delicate acropora since my tank was 6 months old. I credit it to single dosing each trace elements via icp and adding Australian live rock. It’s hard to know what variables exactly have allowed my tank to be stable so early and support acropora but quickly after starting reef moon shiners my tank exploded. I haven’t had any results come back that didn’t make sense either. For example if I increase iodine daily drops my icp comes back increased. It is an added cost but almost balances out the cost of salt for the icp tests. The initial investment did set me back almost 300$.
 
Nutramar Foods

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do get perfect is a hard to use word. Nothing is perfect in this world. However I’m keeping delicate acropora since my tank was 6 months old. I credit it to single dosing each trace elements via icp and adding Australian live rock. It’s hard to know what variables exactly have allowed my tank to be stable so early and support acropora but quickly after starting reef moon shiners my tank exploded. I haven’t had any results come back that didn’t make sense either. For example if I increase iodine daily drops my icp comes back increased. It is an added cost but almost balances out the cost of salt for the icp tests. The initial investment did set me back almost 300$.

Well, I'm glad you are happy with this method. :)
 

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Join the movement!
Back
Top