Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But what I am trying to say is this law is trying to prevent situations like this. The lion fish is invasive and was introduced to the environment and is destroying it.Lion Fish were introduced, presumably in the 80"s. Exotic BS livestock has been around for a long time, and will never be completely eradicated.
I can't/don't see the need to place parallels on an entire hobby9more precise fish hobby) based on a single or even a few species. Most online fish suppliers carry what, 50, 60 maybe a 100 different types of fish?
Yeah was going mention mass economy meltdown at end of 1999 because a computer couldn't do 2000 lol but thought was pushing it just with the mayan prediction of 2012 2012 2012 and dont forget the 12 seconds at end ha haLol I thought it would be all the computers crashing in 2000
The documentation is usually vague at best and often flat-out wrong.Again thay is simply not true. Importing any coral or ornamental fish into the US requires the scientific name on the paperwork. Listing "damsel" or "acropora" does not pass inspection by F&W. Speaking of F&W all imported wildlife must go through them to be imported. They document the scientific names of what is being imported so yes we do have a way of knowing what is currently being imported.
Of course at times the documentation may not be exactly correct, but for practical purposes they have a very good idea of everything that is currently being imported(via legal means anyway).
Well, the easiest way to prevent situations like that is to ban all pets.But what I am trying to say is this law is trying to prevent situations like this.
The documentation is usually vague at best and often flat-out wrong.
Well, the easiest way to prevent situations like that is to ban all pets.
Please provide the number of animals that qualify as "more than minimal quantity". Because that's a subjective phrase.Again no. It’s says unless 1. Imported into the US already in more than minimal quantity
Not going to happen but keep trying to convince people that all pets are going to be banned.The documentation is usually vague at best and often flat-out wrong.
Well, the easiest way to prevent situations like that is to ban all pets.
They cannot provide an exact number because it would vary drastically between species and individuals within those species.Please provide the number of animals that qualify as "more than minimal quantity". Because that's a subjective phrase.
um…..did you read the next line explicitly stating it doesn’t ban everything……The section in question starts on page 1661. The key section is this one on page 1663:
This is worded ambiguously enough to be used to ban nearly everything.
Can you post a link to the entire PDF?The section in question starts on page 1661. The key section is this one on page 1663:
This is worded ambiguously enough to be used to ban nearly everything.
Well it will be more efficient if the government takes my fish when they stop by to take my guns, microchip me, and make me drink Starbucks every day.It is at times wrong...it is never vague(not if you want it approved by F&W)
understood completely, I don't disagree. however, with global trading and "stupid money" taking over we are WAY passed securing the potential for ANY type of invasive species inhabitants.But what I am trying to say is this law is trying to prevent situations like this. The lion fish is invasive and was introduced to the environment and is destroying it.
Can you post a link to the entire PDF?