Higher nutrients do not require higher alkI didn't know that's how it worked.
So higher nutrients require higher alk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Higher nutrients do not require higher alkI didn't know that's how it worked.
So higher nutrients require higher alk.
CorrectI think it's the other way around though. Higher alk encourages growth which requires higher nutrients to assist with the growth demands.
I’ll give a slightly higher Alk a try. I’ve just been playing safe because this is my first successful attempt (to me)so far at a sps mainly acro tank. I don’t really care to have explosive growth tbh just want healthy coral. The corals that are growing are growing well just the frags need a poke. Some frags have not done anything in nearly a yearBro. This is the growth issue. 7.5 is low. That’s for like near zero nutrients
Yes when you ran 9 you got burnt tips because flesh growth couldn’t keep up with skeletal growth. Skeleton grew faster from higher alk, but the flesh was always a few steps behind
If you keep your current nutrient parameters…you should increase to 8 and then 8.5 and then 9. Trust me. And I’m being conservative. You could go higher. But get a plan to increase to 9 over a few weeks then observe the difference.
Some acro species just be like that lolI’ll give a slightly higher Alk a try. I’ve just been playing safe than sorry because this is my first successful (to me) sps mainly acro tank. I don’t really care to have explosive growth tbh just want healthy coral. The corals that are growing are growing well just the frags need a poke. Some frags have not done anything in nearly a year
i don't think that your Po4 is 0.9Di rado controllo la maggior parte dei miei parametri, ma quando l'ho fatto, i miei fosfati erano a 0,90 . Questo dimostra che non dovresti inseguire solo i numeri. C'è molto di più nel reefing di quello che si vede in un test.
Ingliase pfNon credo che il tuo Po4 sia 0,9...
Sorry..Ingliase pf
Why not?i don't think that your Po4 is 0.9
No way what a beautiful tank. Could you share more photos? I love this.I rarely ever check most of my parameters, but when I did check, my phosphates were at 0.90. Goes to show that you shouldn’t solely chase numbers. There’s more to reefing than what shows up in a test.
That was before the spotted rabbitfish ate most of the corals. Here is before adding it.I looked at it both ways but I am genuinely curious to see whether there are more corals there. Those levels don’t make me worry at all but I am curious whether there are lots of corals growing in them. More form a scholarly perspective than anything else
0.7 dang! Lovely torches
Seems many report better results after having ignored their tanks, regardless of reason. Could it just be marketing that drives the hobby to attempt perfection or human nature to impress others
I knew of phosphates with FW tanks somewhere between the 70s and 90s but don't recall it being discussed then with reef tanks to later find the hobby fixated on a study with one acro as best I recall and then there's this assumption that all reef tanks must contain acros or be maintained as if.There is a lot of marketing drive in this hobby. Not to be one of those hobbyist but we never cared about phosphate until they made a test kit for it. Something to think about...