Hi,
I’m hoping for some opinions on whether or not I should add supplemental T5’s to my 2’x2’x2’ (approximately) cube mixed reef. Total volume of around 202 L.
I’m currently using a single Kessil AP9X mounted about 10” above the water. Light program is based on BRS suggestions for an AP9X on mixed reefs, tuned a little bit. Cycle maxes out at 60% peak intensity. Happy to provide the specifics if it helps.
I purchased an aftermarket rack and T5’s recently, but now I’m doubting if I should install them. The rack and strips are such that the setup holds two sets of T5’s (one behind and one in front of the Kessil). You can see it in the attached photo. Both strips are 2x24” 24W T5’s, and I have an ATI Blue Plus and ATI Actinic in each strip. If I install it, the Kessil stand would be removed and Kessil would fit on top of the T5 rack. It would elevate the Kessil by about 1” from its current mounting height and change the angle to flat vs. it’s current very slight angle backwards.
First photo is without the T5’s, other two are with the T5’s mounted but without the AP9X properly placed into the rack. Hopefully you can imagine the look if the AP9X was also installed.
Photos are also a bit blue but hopefully clear enough.
I can’t see a lot of downside to adding the T5’s other than I’m not sure they look as nice as the Kessil alone with it’s stock mount. If I add them, I would start at just a couple of hours per day at peak light on my LED cycle and eventually ramp up to maybe 5 or 6 hours a day supplemental. Of course there’s a bit more heat produced and electricity consumed if adding these T5’s, but it should be manageable.
Main purpose of adding these would be to fill in shadowy areas in the front, back, and sides of the tank. Areas that I’m trying to grow mushrooms, zoas, leathers and some other lower light stuff. Perhaps with a bonus of a bit of extra light for the rest of the tank as well. PAR measurements are difficult where I live as quality meters aren’t available, and those available are really expensive (overseas American here). So I don’t have a real PAR mapping of my tank, only references from the internet.
What do you all think? Do you think the addition of the T5’s would bring enough benefits to accept the cosmetic changes to the setup? Or if it were you, would you just keep the Kessil AP9X as it is and not add T5’s at all? I’ve tried to aquascape in a kind of minimalist island/cave/reverse space way while still having a lot of live rock, and felt the Kessil’s look fit well into that. If adding the T5’s is much better for the tank maybe I just suck it up and accept the larger light setup.
Thanks in advance for your comments and ideas.
Adam
I’m hoping for some opinions on whether or not I should add supplemental T5’s to my 2’x2’x2’ (approximately) cube mixed reef. Total volume of around 202 L.
I’m currently using a single Kessil AP9X mounted about 10” above the water. Light program is based on BRS suggestions for an AP9X on mixed reefs, tuned a little bit. Cycle maxes out at 60% peak intensity. Happy to provide the specifics if it helps.
I purchased an aftermarket rack and T5’s recently, but now I’m doubting if I should install them. The rack and strips are such that the setup holds two sets of T5’s (one behind and one in front of the Kessil). You can see it in the attached photo. Both strips are 2x24” 24W T5’s, and I have an ATI Blue Plus and ATI Actinic in each strip. If I install it, the Kessil stand would be removed and Kessil would fit on top of the T5 rack. It would elevate the Kessil by about 1” from its current mounting height and change the angle to flat vs. it’s current very slight angle backwards.
First photo is without the T5’s, other two are with the T5’s mounted but without the AP9X properly placed into the rack. Hopefully you can imagine the look if the AP9X was also installed.
Photos are also a bit blue but hopefully clear enough.
I can’t see a lot of downside to adding the T5’s other than I’m not sure they look as nice as the Kessil alone with it’s stock mount. If I add them, I would start at just a couple of hours per day at peak light on my LED cycle and eventually ramp up to maybe 5 or 6 hours a day supplemental. Of course there’s a bit more heat produced and electricity consumed if adding these T5’s, but it should be manageable.
Main purpose of adding these would be to fill in shadowy areas in the front, back, and sides of the tank. Areas that I’m trying to grow mushrooms, zoas, leathers and some other lower light stuff. Perhaps with a bonus of a bit of extra light for the rest of the tank as well. PAR measurements are difficult where I live as quality meters aren’t available, and those available are really expensive (overseas American here). So I don’t have a real PAR mapping of my tank, only references from the internet.
What do you all think? Do you think the addition of the T5’s would bring enough benefits to accept the cosmetic changes to the setup? Or if it were you, would you just keep the Kessil AP9X as it is and not add T5’s at all? I’ve tried to aquascape in a kind of minimalist island/cave/reverse space way while still having a lot of live rock, and felt the Kessil’s look fit well into that. If adding the T5’s is much better for the tank maybe I just suck it up and accept the larger light setup.
Thanks in advance for your comments and ideas.
Adam