Optimal Parameters for a Coral Reef Aquarium: By Randy Holmes-Farley

Nutramar Foods
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Interesting, you'd think pH would take a hit with the addition of an acid. Do you do anything to help raise pH in general?

All types of carbon dosing have a temporary pH lowering effect since they end up as CO2. Vinegar just has more of it up front than, say, vodka.

If you spread it out enough, the effect is very minor as the tank has a chance to blow off any excess CO2.

If dosing vinegar all at once, there will be a substantial pH lowering effect. When I was dosing that way, i saturated the vinegar with calcium hydroxide to prevent there being any pH lowering. That is cheap and easy.

I later switched to a dosing pump to spread out the dosing more, and dropped using the calcium hydroxide.
 

AirIck

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
120
Reaction score
20
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Tampa Bay
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Randy Holmes-Farley How do I know if I am ready to start dosing or not? I am able to stay within the recommended parameter ranges of Alk, Cal, and Mag with my weekly water changes. However, I do swing from the upper end of the parameters to the very bottom of the parameters by the time I am ready for a water change. Am I good to continue to monitor with water changes only or would it be wise to start slowly dosing so I am not going from upper to lower ends of the ranges, particularly my Alk?

My Alk starts around 9.7 after water change and then by the end of the week I'm around 9, my Cal I'm more consistent (tend to run higher for some reason right after a water change, about 460 then starts to drop throughout the week). Mag, after water change I'm about 1350, by end of week up in the upper 1290s. I only test with my Apex (no backup test although I do own a Hanna Alk tester and redsea Cal and Mag test kits).

I hope my question made sense!
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If water changes alone keep alk in a range that is ok for you, there's no need for dosing.

As soon as alk drops more than you want, then dosing is in order.

Calcium drops much more slowly, and I'd use alk as the guide for dosing both.
 

ISpeakForTheSeas

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Messages
3,058
Reaction score
3,640
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey Randy, first off, great article.

Second, are these surface water values fairly uniform to a substantial depth, or do they change dramatically within just a few dozen meters? (I.e. is the value at the surface the same or close to the same as at 30 meters deep? 60 meters?)

Third, by chance, do we know what these parameters’ values typically are for deeper points in the ocean, or just for the surface? (In other words, do we know what these parameters typically are for the mesopelagic, bathypelagic, abyssopelagic, and hadopelagic zones, or just for the epipelagic zone?)

Fourth (and last), do you have any recommendations on where/how to learn more about these values and the role they play in fish/corals/etc., particularly in the deeper parts of the ocean?
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

LeBon

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Messages
107
Reaction score
71
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Spain
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In days gone by, most of these parametres were kept in balance with simple water changes and top offs.

Nowadays the majority of folk are removing all the trace elements with rodi systems and not replacing them during top off. Making more regular regular waterchanges more import than ever so at least we are adding what is in the salts.

I dont think the majority of 'hometanks' really still need anything more than these waterchanges/trace replacements. Its pretty large tanks'packed' with stoneys that may well need calcium reactors etc
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey Randy, first off, great article.

Second, are these surface water values fairly uniform to a substantial depth, or do they change dramatically within just a few dozen meters? (I.e. is the value at the surface the same or close to the same as at 30 meters deep? 60 meters?)

Third, by chance, do we know what these parameters’ values typically are for deeper points in the ocean, or just for the surface? (In other words, do we know what these parameters typically are for the mesopelagic, bathypelagic, abyssopelagic, and hadopelagic zones, or just for the epipelagic zone?)

Fourth (and last), do you have any recommendations on where/how to learn more about these values and the role they play in fish/corals/etc., particularly in the deeper parts of the ocean?

Which parameters are you referring to?

Alkalinity and the major ions (and many minor ions) of seawater only vary by local salinity, not location or depth (unless you are near a river mouth).

Trace elements vary mostly by depth, with different ones enriched or depleted at different depths. Some, like iron, are depleted at the surface, some at lower depths.

The book "Chemical Oceanography" by Millero shows lots of this sort of data and discusses it in detail.
 

ISpeakForTheSeas

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Messages
3,058
Reaction score
3,640
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which parameters are you referring to?

Alkalinity and the major ions (and many minor ions) of seawater only vary by local salinity, not location or depth (unless you are near a river mouth).

Trace elements vary mostly by depth, with different ones enriched or depleted at different depths. Some, like iron, are depleted at the surface, some at lower depths.

The book "Chemical Oceanography" by Millero shows lots of this sort of data and discusses it in detail.
I was wondering primarily about Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphate, Ammonia, the parameters in Table 2 (Potassium, Silica, Iodine, Nitrate, Nitrite, Strontium, ORP, Boron, and Iron), and any other values that might be important at lower depths but not near the surface.

I know that Nitrate and Phosphate increase drastically from the surface of the ocean to the top of the mesopelagic zone, but I'm hoping to learn more about the roles, concentrations, and importance of Nitrate, Phosphate, and anything else that might be important at various depths/zones in the ocean as well.

Thank you for the recommendation! The book looks like it will be a great resource for me to learn from/start with.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was wondering primarily about Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphate, Ammonia, the parameters in Table 2 (Potassium, Silica, Iodine, Nitrate, Nitrite, Strontium, ORP, Boron, and Iron), and any other values that might be important at lower depths but not near the surface.

I know that Nitrate and Phosphate increase drastically from the surface of the ocean to the top of the mesopelagic zone, but I'm hoping to learn more about the roles, concentrations, and importance of Nitrate, Phosphate, and anything else that might be important at various depths/zones in the ocean as well.

Thank you for the recommendation! The book looks like it will be a great resource for me to learn from/start with.

Of your list, these only change with salinity:

Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Iodine, Strontium, Boron.

The articles I show at the top of this forum on the individual ions often have additional discussion on the others.

For example:


Iron in the Ocean
Iron in the ocean is primarily iron(III) (Fe3+), because any Fe2+ that forms is oxidized back to Fe3+ by oxygen (O2) and other oxidizing species. The concentration of iron varies substantially with location and depth, and is depleted at the surface due to scavenging by organisms. Typical surface concentrations are on the order of 0.1 nM (0.000006 ppm). When not bound to an organic molecule, iron in seawater exists primarily as dissolved Fe(OH)3. Iron(III) is quite insoluble in seawater at pH 8.2 due to the formation of iron oxides (rust) of various compositions. In fact, it is one of the least soluble cations in seawater. So dumping in a lot of unbound iron into a reef tank may simply result in much of it precipitating onto the bottom.

In most of the oceans, the growth of phytoplankton is limited by nitrogen sources (typically nitrate). In some places, however, where there is adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica (if we are referring to diatoms), the growth of phytoplankton is believed to be limited by the availability of iron. Experiments have, in fact, shown that growth can be increased in some of these areas through addition of iron to the ocean. Many of these experiments are summarized by Frank Millero in his book “Chemical Oceanography” (second edition; 1996).

One of the facts that arises from these studies involves phosphorus. The preferred solution ratio of iron to phosphorus is between 1:100 and 1:1250 for coastal species of phytoplankton, and about 1:10,000 for open ocean species, suggesting that the open ocean species have developed better mechanisms for collecting and/or using iron. I mention this fact not because we can use it quantitatively to know if we have enough iron in our systems, but rather to demonstrate that different organisms have different abilities to fulfill their iron requirements, and that iron may be limiting the growth of one organism, while in the same tank, nitrogen, phosphorus or silica may be limiting to another.

Note that I stated that if the iron is not bound to an organic it would primarily exist as soluble Fe(OH)3. However, in both the oceans and in reef tanks, there are uncounted hordes of organic molecules that bind iron quite strongly. Unfortunately, while the speciation of some metals has been well studied in some fresh water systems (such as copper in certain lakes), the speciation of iron in seawater has not generally been elucidated. I expect this lack of information stems largely from the difficulty in identifying all of the organic species present, in knowing which ones are binding iron, and in the fact that the nature of organic molecules in seawater will vary from location to location, from season to season, and likely even with the time of day.
 

ISpeakForTheSeas

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Messages
3,058
Reaction score
3,640
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Of your list, these only change with salinity:

Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Iodine, Strontium, Boron.

The articles I show at the top of this forum on the individual ions often have additional discussion on the others.

For example:


Iron in the Ocean
Iron in the ocean is primarily iron(III) (Fe3+), because any Fe2+ that forms is oxidized back to Fe3+ by oxygen (O2) and other oxidizing species. The concentration of iron varies substantially with location and depth, and is depleted at the surface due to scavenging by organisms. Typical surface concentrations are on the order of 0.1 nM (0.000006 ppm). When not bound to an organic molecule, iron in seawater exists primarily as dissolved Fe(OH)3. Iron(III) is quite insoluble in seawater at pH 8.2 due to the formation of iron oxides (rust) of various compositions. In fact, it is one of the least soluble cations in seawater. So dumping in a lot of unbound iron into a reef tank may simply result in much of it precipitating onto the bottom.

In most of the oceans, the growth of phytoplankton is limited by nitrogen sources (typically nitrate). In some places, however, where there is adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica (if we are referring to diatoms), the growth of phytoplankton is believed to be limited by the availability of iron. Experiments have, in fact, shown that growth can be increased in some of these areas through addition of iron to the ocean. Many of these experiments are summarized by Frank Millero in his book “Chemical Oceanography” (second edition; 1996).

One of the facts that arises from these studies involves phosphorus. The preferred solution ratio of iron to phosphorus is between 1:100 and 1:1250 for coastal species of phytoplankton, and about 1:10,000 for open ocean species, suggesting that the open ocean species have developed better mechanisms for collecting and/or using iron. I mention this fact not because we can use it quantitatively to know if we have enough iron in our systems, but rather to demonstrate that different organisms have different abilities to fulfill their iron requirements, and that iron may be limiting the growth of one organism, while in the same tank, nitrogen, phosphorus or silica may be limiting to another.

Note that I stated that if the iron is not bound to an organic it would primarily exist as soluble Fe(OH)3. However, in both the oceans and in reef tanks, there are uncounted hordes of organic molecules that bind iron quite strongly. Unfortunately, while the speciation of some metals has been well studied in some fresh water systems (such as copper in certain lakes), the speciation of iron in seawater has not generally been elucidated. I expect this lack of information stems largely from the difficulty in identifying all of the organic species present, in knowing which ones are binding iron, and in the fact that the nature of organic molecules in seawater will vary from location to location, from season to season, and likely even with the time of day.
Good to know.
Thank you!
 
AS
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So safe to say .25 nitrite will not be harmful? Have a new tank and haven’t measured ammonia in weeks. Nitrite holding steady at .25

Yes, that and much higher values are safe. The 0.25 ppm you report might also just be test error at the low end of the kit.
 

ShepherdReefer

5000 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Feb 6, 2020
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
27,419
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Shepherdsville, KY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Great article Randy Holmes-Farley; taking it all in and might have a few questions on the subject after I get some future testing equipment for other parameters.
 

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Back
Top