New tank fish IN cycle, ammonia won't go down

OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lethal levels of ammonia are higher than 1.2 ppm.


ALL of the data supports the idea that few of these fish (much less than half) would die in 10-20 ppm total ammonia in 2 days. It takes 4 days in more than twice as much ammonia to kill even half of them.
Thanks for the reply. I have read your thread and the 2 papers. Honestly, I think a LOT of the confusion on this forum Is the different ways and terminology of reporting ammonia in different threads and replies with a bunch of non chemists. UAI-N, NH3-N, TA N, etc.. these papers are confusing for non chemists.

The paper you link is clear with UAI N vs TA N, but the other one with clownfish specifically which I am interested in, isn’t 100% clear for me.
If I am understanding correctly, the clownfish paper is saying NH3-N 1.2, so that is UN-Ionized and would be a number that is derived from converting using PH and Temp from my Hannah reading correct? Is this the same as saying UAI N in the other paper? If so, then my levels of 0.042 UAI-N are way below the lethal levels in the papers

Thanks and sorry for the confusion.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the reply. I have read your thread and the 2 papers. Honestly, I think a LOT of the confusion on this forum Is the different ways and terminology of reporting ammonia in different threads and replies with a bunch of non chemists. UAI-N, NH3-N, TA N, etc.. these papers are confusing for non chemists.

The paper you link is clear with UAI N vs TA N, but the other one with clownfish specifically which I am interested in, isn’t 100% clear for me.
If I am understanding correctly, the clownfish paper is saying NH3-N 1.2, so that is UN-Ionized and would be a number that is derived from converting using PH and Temp from my Hannah reading correct? Is this the same as saying UAI N in the other paper? If so, then my levels of 0.042 UAI-N are way below the lethal levels in the papers

Thanks and sorry for the confusion.

I don’t have access to that paper in my phone to double check, but here is the analysis I gave ln that thread:

Yes, a little more toxic, with the LC50 in 24 h being 1.06 ppm free ammonia, which corresponds to ~25 ppm total ammonia at pH 8.
 
OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don’t have access to that paper in my phone to double check, but here is the analysis I gave ln that thread:

Yes, a little more toxic, with the LC50 in 24 h being 1.06 ppm free ammonia, which corresponds to ~25 ppm total ammonia at pH 8.
Got it, I saw that note you made. Thanks again.
 

Aidan_823

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
8
Location
Westfall
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another safety idea for the fish could be to add prime to bind the ammonia and stop it being toxic to fish, but it only lasts two days then you need to repeat. It sends the skimmer wild though!
Dose prime 1/2 to 3/4 of a full dose though, if you dose full your bacteria will be starved and may end up resetting the cycle.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Dose prime 1/2 to 3/4 of a full dose though, if you dose full your bacteria will be starved and may end up resetting the cycle.

Prime appears to be useless with respect to ammonia. Don’t be fooled by claims.
 
OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
can't wait to see in ten days if this tank lives perfectly, as fritz is known to do.
Things are looking good in the tank and trending in the right direction now on day 10. Fish have been in since day 1.

Ammonia
TA N
Day 7 - 1.05
Day 8 - 0.66 (after 40% water change and 2nd bottle Fritz)
Day 9 - 0.59
Day 10 - 0.44 or (*0.032 toxic NH3)

IMG_6695.jpeg

IMG_6700.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Things are looking good in the tank and trending in the right direction now on day 10. Fish have been in since day 1.

Ammonia
TA N
Day 7 - 1.05
Day 8 - 0.66 (after 40% water change and 2nd bottle Fritz)
Day 9 - 0.59
Day 10 - 0.44 or (*0.032 toxic NH3)

IMG_6695.jpeg

IMG_6700.jpeg

Looks good. :)
 
OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
TA N ammonia
Day 11 - 0.36

I think the numbers have been very consistent and repeatable with the Hannah and it was a worthwhile piece of mind over the guess your color tests with significant variance potential. It appears, as Randy and Brandon have stated, these cheap test kits and “commonly stated” toxicity levels (I was within and beyond) are overblown and cause undue alarm/panic with bottle bacteria. Although my TA N “numbers” moved much slower than anticipated, my fish have looked normal, active, and feeding well from day 1 to day 11, even when sitting above 1.0 ppm TA N for a couple days and my seachem badge warning.

Thank you all for the guidance through my initial panic.
 
OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Day 16

Tank parameters have stabilized.

Hanah has been showing 0.16 for three days now. This appears to be my tank's "zero ammonia" baseline level.
IMG_6746 2.jpg


@brandon429
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Day 16

Tank parameters have stabilized.

Hanah has been showing 0.16 for three days now. This appears to be my tank's "zero ammonia" baseline level.
IMG_6746 2.jpg


@brandon429

It may be accurate, or it may not be, but I’d certainly stop testing. It should not be a goal for reefers to attain undetectable ammonia.
 
OP
OP
R

RyanP

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It may be accurate, or it may not be, but I’d certainly stop testing. It should not be a goal for reefers to attain undetectable ammonia.
Thanks Randy,

I won't be testing for ammonia anymore. I just added that final post to show anyone else new also using a Hanah, that they probably shouldn't expect a zero reading either. I know that now, thanks to you folks who understand this better than me.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top