melypr1985
totally addicted
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
R2R Excellence Award
Expert Contributor
Article Contributor
Moderator Emeritus
- Joined
- May 4, 2014
- Messages
- 15,113
- Reaction score
- 23,527
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- Location
- Dallas area
I just read the article and from what I just read it seems like a great method. From the results in the Kollman study I don't understand why all LFS don't keep all there fish only systems at a Hyposalinity. It seems like the best option for the fish and the store since it is easy and cheap.
Have you had good experiences with this? Seems like all you would need is the basic QT setup and a cheap ATO for the QT tank. If it really replaces both prazi and copper/CP, why would I not want to try it on the next batch of fish? If you know something I don't feel free to chime in. Thanks again for all the great info.
The reason more people dont use it is because it's difficult to execute properly. If your salinity edges even a little above the 1.009 then you have to start over.(edit to say: there are also hypo resistant strains of ich out there) Having an ATO helps alot as well. The reason we dont do it at our store is because we mix all our water at 1.025 (we sell it and use it for our other systems as well. It would take a lot of work to fill our sump to a certain level, then add a certain level of fresh water to that. Teaching the others to do this properly as well is a problem. This is minor though, the bigest problem for us is evap. Our system is more than 2,000 and we just can't get an ATO for that large of a system. So, even if I went through the trouble to make water changes easy for everyone, the evap would kill us on it. I'm honestly trying to get them to run prazi once a week in our FO system instead of copper since most of our fish have a bigger problem with flukes than with ich. I hope that answers at least part of your question, the nyquil is kicking in and I'm probably losing it a little