@AquaSD
Normally I am hesitant to openly use the vendor feedback as I believe it unfairly skews vendor reputation negatively…
@Daniel@R2R
I also mostly understand that resolving issues on the vendor feedback forum makes perfect sense especially from a administrative perspective as threads can turn into a pitchfork a torches thing and unfairly effect a sponsors bottom line, but…
by forcing the “compartmentalization” of individual problems into a “one on one” vendor feedback format you don’t get an overview of the complete situation: there is no format to accurately compile the data to see there is a real issue. Had I not read this thread ASD 3 day shipping delay
I might have taken all the dead frags I’ve received this past month as a “one of” fluke.
…sure one could read the exclusive back and forth from JUST the vendor to customer, and bear witness as the issue gets resolved, but that is a very different dynamic from a open forum discussion, which is more evolutionary.
…..there is DOA, and then there is “SOA” (stressed on arrival) which is basically bleached corals: not dead yet but will be….
I have been a long time customer of Aqua SD and just in dollars spent gives me some street cred here. I don’t fully trust the system but I’m forced to use it. Bottom line, my emails and phone calls hasn’t yet translated into replacement corals.
Also while every vendor uses a similar DOA policy; few cover losses after 24hrs, many of which are likely due to stresses outside the customers control, for instance: bleached corals from heat stress. Who covers that?
Added: Aqua SD is/was a solid vendor and I’m guessing here but they have recently departed from their past high level of service
Normally I am hesitant to openly use the vendor feedback as I believe it unfairly skews vendor reputation negatively…
@Daniel@R2R
I agree. The benefit to using the feedback forum is that specific issues can be addressed directly rather than getting lost in a thread where multiple posts regarding feedback are made. It is why our feedback policy is what it is. Our hope is that situations like these get resolved, and this happens more easily when they can be addressed without a lot of outside commentary from people not involved in the transaction.
I also mostly understand that resolving issues on the vendor feedback forum makes perfect sense especially from a administrative perspective as threads can turn into a pitchfork a torches thing and unfairly effect a sponsors bottom line, but…
by forcing the “compartmentalization” of individual problems into a “one on one” vendor feedback format you don’t get an overview of the complete situation: there is no format to accurately compile the data to see there is a real issue. Had I not read this thread ASD 3 day shipping delay
I might have taken all the dead frags I’ve received this past month as a “one of” fluke.
…sure one could read the exclusive back and forth from JUST the vendor to customer, and bear witness as the issue gets resolved, but that is a very different dynamic from a open forum discussion, which is more evolutionary.
…..there is DOA, and then there is “SOA” (stressed on arrival) which is basically bleached corals: not dead yet but will be….
I have been a long time customer of Aqua SD and just in dollars spent gives me some street cred here. I don’t fully trust the system but I’m forced to use it. Bottom line, my emails and phone calls hasn’t yet translated into replacement corals.
Also while every vendor uses a similar DOA policy; few cover losses after 24hrs, many of which are likely due to stresses outside the customers control, for instance: bleached corals from heat stress. Who covers that?
Added: Aqua SD is/was a solid vendor and I’m guessing here but they have recently departed from their past high level of service
Last edited: