What Are Your Thoughts On UV Sterilizers?

bushdoc

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2022
Messages
1,422
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Fresno
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Interesting link.… but that leads to an even broader debate (for another thread). Are we trying to (or should we be trying to) replicate what is in nature in our captive reefs? :astonished-face:
I will answer with another article from AquaBiomics, or better graph from this article. It looks as if Pelagibacteraceae are one of the most abundant bacterial families in established reef tanks, so perhaps we are not trying to replicate nature, but nature still find ways into our tanks.
 

Attachments

  • family-abundance.jpg
    family-abundance.jpg
    130.9 KB · Views: 37

Moscar

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
89
Reaction score
71
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No where did he say "clarify". His observation is just that, his observation.
plenty of natural UV to purify water
I'm a Zeo head, so no UV is permitted.
But! I have one and an extra circulator pump that I can add easily to my sump(s) if I really, really have the need.
Pre ZeoVit, UV did clear up a bloom of an unknown nature in less than 24hours.
You are twisting his words…
Don't feed the troll, click [IGNORE].
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Lavey29

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Messages
13,117
Reaction score
14,356
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I will answer with another article from AquaBiomics, or better graph from this article. It looks as if Pelagibacteraceae are one of the most abundant bacterial families in established reef tanks, so perhaps we are not trying to replicate nature, but nature still find ways into our tanks.
I wish a standard ICP test could also give you your microbiome bacteria numbers too
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No where did he say "clarify". His observation is just that, his observation.
Clarify, purify… the difference between the two makes absolutely makes no difference In context to my point or comment. That point was that his ‘ observation‘ can’t be correlated in any way to UV sterilizers for aquariums. That point still stands. I am baffled at the number of you who want to quibble words and have missed the very point of his comment and my response, like my delivery not.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wish a standard ICP test could also give you your microbiome bacteria numbers too
Two absolutely unrelated sciences and tests.

To that end, I am not at all sure what use a microbiome tests is for most folks other than being interesting, especially given the fact that most predominately end up looking very similar in a mature system.
 

Dinkins Aquatic Gardens

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 12, 2021
Messages
2,138
Reaction score
1,360
Location
TX
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Curious to see how many people on R2R use UV Sterilizers on their aquariums.

What or your thoughts on UV Sterilizer lights for Reef aquariums?

I absolutely love UV. I will say to be sure and change the bulbs/clean the quartz sleeve regularly. If you're looking for help with disease, be sure you have the correct flowrate nailed and even then it's a good idea to oversize the UV.
 

Lavey29

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Messages
13,117
Reaction score
14,356
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Two absolutely unrelated sciences and tests.

To that end, I am not at all sure what use a microbiome tests is for most folks other than being interesting, especially given the fact that most predominately end up looking very similar in a mature system.
I wouldn't say they are unrelated. If your water chemistry is off then your microbiome may be suffering in an unfavorable environment which means tank problems.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wouldn't say they are unrelated. If your water chemistry is off then your microbiome may be suffering in an unfavorable environment which means tank problems.
Unrelated sciences in the context of testing, equipment and expertise. One is pure biology, the other pure is chemistry.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I will say to be sure and change the bulbs/clean the quartz sleeve regularly.
The part (esp cleaning) that many folks ignore and end up getting a fraction of the potential (whatever that ends up being) out of their already typically undersized UV.
 

Lowell Lemon

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 23, 2015
Messages
4,179
Reaction score
18,145
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Okay here we go again with opinion without possible experience. I have over 30 years of real life on the ground experience with large and small UV systems. So in my opinion and experience properly fabricated systems work every time.

I layed out multiple retail aquarium stores in the 80's to 2000's and used properly sized System Paks from Aquanetics. These included temperture control both (heating and chilling), mechanical filtration, chemical filtration and U.V. matched to the pump. This was coupled to trickle towers, protein skimmers (for saltwater systems) and large sumps to handle all the tanks plumbed into the system. Inverts one system, saltwater fish one system. Freshwater tropical and Freshwater cold on separate systems. In every case the retail stores fish loss rates plummeted from as high as 30 percent down to 1-3 percent across every store. I have added UV to two 1500 gallon tanks that were losing fish due to disease along with the System Paks and the losses stopped almost overnight. I hired a DVM employed by WSU with aqua culture experience to diagnose the problem in the systems and recommend the equipment upgrade via decropsy and microscopic inspection of the fish. Properly designed and used the UV works for disease eradication and prevention both in single and multiple aquarium environments. Many public aquariums use this technology with ozone injection and biosecurity measures to great effect. Some public aquariums use UV to filter fresh seawater before introduction to the display or holding systems. The biggest problem is not using the proper UV sterilizers (quartz sleeved) matched to the main pump. Not a manifold hook up or smaller loop circulation system but one rated to the turn over pump rate you want in the system. This is after mechanical filtration to prevent turbidity from reducing the effectiveness of the UV. It is hard for me to remain silent when such broad claims are made about there effectiveness that come from those who may have no real experience in the aquatic industry. Repeated success across multiple systems is science not conjecture. While managing laboratories for 10 plus years I became dependant on repeated success to deliver scientifically repeatable results.

Is UV necessary for every aquarium of course not. Is prophylactic treatment of fish without diagnosis necessary for every fish of course not. When you are setting up a new aquarium you may benefit from the proper use until the tank and population is stable. Then since you are no longer bringing new specimens into the tank you could suspend its use. It is just another biosecurity measure that works if you follow proper design. It is just a tool and a good one at that!

You could have the same success with other biosecurity measures if you have the expertise and time to take your fish and inverts through the necessary steps. I do notice the preponderance of failures on R2R with attempts of a large majority of people that experience loss rates way in excess to the stores I partnered with in the past. Doing the same thing over again with poor results damages the hobby. Stating certain tools don't work without knowing how and when to employ them leades to failures and blanket statements the honestly don't match real world experience.
 
Last edited:

Viking_Reefing

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
2,186
Location
Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Okay here we go again with opinion without possible experience. I have over 30 years of real life on the ground experience with large and small UV systems. So in my opinion and experience properly fabricated systems work ever time.

I layed out multiple retail aquarium stores in the 80's to 2000's and used properly sized System Paks from Aquanetics. These included temperture control both (heating and chilling), mechanical filtration, chemical filtration and U.V. matched to the pump. This was coupled to trickle towers, protein skimmers (for saltwater systems) and large sumps to handle all the tanks plumbed into the system. Inverts one system, saltwater fish one system. Freshwater tropical and Freshwater cold on separate systems. In every case the retail stores fish loss rates plummeted from as high as 30 percent down to 1-3 percent across every store. I have added UV to two 1500 gallon tanks that were losing fish due to disease along with the System Paks and the losses stopped almost overnight. I hired a DVM employed by WSU with aqua culture experience to diagnose the problem in the systems and recommend the equipment upgrade via decropsy and microscopic inspection of the fish. Properly designed and used the UV works for disease eradication and prevention both in single and multiple aquarium environments. Many public aquariums use this technology with ozone injection and biosecurity measures to great effect. Some public aquariums use UV to filter fresh seawater before introduction to the display or holding systems. The biggest problem is not using the proper UV sterilizers (quartz sleeved) matched to the main pump. Not a manifold hook up or smaller loop circulation system but one rated to the turn over pump rate you want in the system. This is after mechanical filtration to prevent turbidity from reducing the effectiveness of the UV. It is hard for me to remain silent when such broad claims are made about there effectiveness that come from those who may have no real experience in the aquatic industry. Repeated success across multiple systems is science not conjecture. While managing laboratories for 10 plus years I became dependant on repeated success to deliver scientifically repeatable results.

Is UV necessary for every aquarium of course not. Is prophylactic treatment of fish without diagnosis necessary for every fish of course not. When you are setting up a new aquarium you may benefit from the proper use until the tank and population is stable. Then since you are no longer bringing new specimens into the tank you could suspend its use. It is just another biosecurity measure that works if you follow proper design. It is just a tool and a good one at that!

You could have the same success with other biosecurity measures if you have the expertise and time to take your fish and inverts through the necessary steps. I do notice the preponderance of failures on R2R with attempts of a large majority of people that experience loss rates way in excess to the stores I partnered with in the past. Doing the same thing over agin with poor results damages the hobby. Stating certain tools don't work without knowing how and when to employ them leades to failures and blanket statements the honestly don't match real world experience.
I fully agree. A lot of uninformed opinions here.
UV doesn’t work for disease control?
All studies and literature say that it does.
Why is it that basically every commercial breeding operation, public aquarium, importer etc use them for this exact purpose?

The biggest downfall I see when people are implementing a UV on a system is that they are almost never using the right size (if it’s for protozoan control). A 40w unit on a 1000L tank won’t do jack. A 180w unit Will however give you great results.

It’s not a bandaid to use to counteract improper husbandry but can be a great addition to a healthy system as a whole.
 
Last edited:

Dolphis

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2020
Messages
84
Reaction score
66
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I purchased a large UV in hopes it would help with ich and such, but never saw any benefits.
Never did run it in a set up for algae blooms , so I can’t comment in that aspect.
However, I feel like it was a big waste of money and found QT a better option, with much better results.
I’ve taken the UV offline, but haven’t completely gotten rid of it, but I doubt I’ll ever use it again
 

Viking_Reefing

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
2,186
Location
Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I purchased a large UV in hopes it would help with ich and such, but never saw any benefits.
Never did run it in a set up for algae blooms , so I can’t comment in that aspect.
However, I feel like it was a big waste of money and found QT a better option, with much better results.
I’ve taken the UV offline, but haven’t completely gotten rid of it, but I doubt I’ll ever use it again
What was your uWs/cm2 dosage?
 

flashsmith

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
2,353
Location
Dayton
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For clarity nothing beats them. I saw someone say snake oil. Everything in this hobby could be considered snake oil in some way. I know when my uv is off line within a day. Water starts turning a light milky color. Film on the glass faster than normal. I run them on both of my systems and wouldn't run a tank without one. Depends on your goals really. I think people who don't run them are used to the appearance of their tanks. I can tell right away when a tank isn't running uv just by the water.
 

FishTruck

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2018
Messages
974
Reaction score
1,602
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For the hobbyist... looking just for clear water... I also advocate plumbing it in the sump, in parallel, with a DC adjustable pump. Super easy. This allows a cheap estimate of the actual water flow and the option to run at low flow or high flow with the touch of a button. And, it's easy to take it off line for service, or if you just don't want to run it for awhile.

Running it directly in and out of the the display the same way is probably better if you can swing it without it being an eyesore.

...or directly from the return pump with valves and a flow meter.... but is a hassle to set up this way and probably not necessary for simple water clarification.
 

CoralB

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Messages
6,366
Reaction score
32,561
Location
Orlando, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would also point out that a UV light only has effects on what is in the water column . What may or may not be on your substrate, glass, or rock etc. will not be affected by a UV light
 

CoralB

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Messages
6,366
Reaction score
32,561
Location
Orlando, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If your fish already have a ick or any other disease a UV will not have a affect except in keeping the water column clear
 

ScottB

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
7,895
Reaction score
12,193
Location
Fairfield County, CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I always keep an oversized UV prepped and ready to slap on my two systems. Stuff happens. Ich, and certain dinoflagellates can be quickly managed (not eliminated) with a whopping UV.

Yeah, it is big, ugly and expensive. But it is temporary and occasionally necessary IME.
 
Back
Top