The Optimal Light Spectrum in a Reef Aquarium

Jamo7

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
626
Reaction score
2,721
Location
Washington state
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
To be honest this discussion has spread over at least 6 other threads now and it's the same on all of them.
So let it rest.
Well, after reading Dana Riddle's old article today, I'm not sure if there are good answers.
there is no right or wrong. I see everything different then others. It’s all about lighting. Same as someone once told me. “Even if you could read others minds, you would never be able to figure out what their mind was telling YOU”
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,970
Reaction score
3,673
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The white light is the reason the corals are mostly yellows and browns. It's not until they are placed in our reefs, under artificial light spectrums that they change to the crazy colors that people see in captive reefs.
Reminds me of one of the most misused photos..
78c32bc3edacc411c8ed3cc28d60d726.jpg
 
Last edited:

Koh23

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 23, 2021
Messages
1,306
Reaction score
1,052
Location
Croatia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It makes me think that corals really dont care about all of ours guessing, scientific mumbo jumbo, and light manufacturers claims....

Give them light and they will grow.

We can talk about growth rate, pattern, colors, extensions, but that leads us only in new "mumbo jumbo".....

Corals in tank dont need sunrise, sunset, clouds, thunders, moonlights and god knows what other gizmos manufacturers puts in lights.....

They need light and stability, wrong constant spectrum is better than ideal which user change five times per day....

So the best spectrum is probably - stable spectrum ;)
 

Shooter6

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 13, 2017
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
1,450
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It makes me think that corals really dont care about all of ours guessing, scientific mumbo jumbo, and light manufacturers claims....

Give them light and they will grow.

We can talk about growth rate, pattern, colors, extensions, but that leads us only in new "mumbo jumbo".....

Corals in tank dont need sunrise, sunset, clouds, thunders, moonlights and god knows what other gizmos manufacturers puts in lights.....

They need light and stability, wrong constant spectrum is better than ideal which user change five times per day....

So the best spectrum is probably - stable spectrum ;)
Very true.

Down on the great barrier reef we did see monti caps and acro fingers poking out of the ocean in places with wave action. No those must have been getting par in the thousands but they were still growing.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,970
Reaction score
3,673
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very true.

Down on the great barrier reef we did see monti caps and acro fingers poking out of the ocean in places with wave action. No those must have been getting par in the thousands but they were still growing.
Well for starters there is NO DOUBT in my mind that 1400 PAR can saturate photosynthesis for most corals if not all.

Fortunately the sun is sooo inconsistent that the high par is only for a brief while.

:)


image005-4e1d42d15ab2c68603873f4dd48d1fea.png


It would seem that our concerns about lighting are finally over; that it is just a matter of time before these 400 or 1000-watt lamps find their way to our tanks, and our corals will respond in a positive manner, literally growing out of the water to bask under an unblinking artificial sun. We have not only mimicked nature – we have improved upon it!

We take this information and combine it with anecdotal evidence from hobbyists and make sweeping statements, such as:

  • Small-polyp corals require intense lighting!
  • Soft corals require less light than stony corals!
  • Lighting systems utilizing metal halide lamps are necessary to maintain SPS corals!
It appears as if we have it all figured out. We forgot to ask the corals.

This article will examine the optimal amounts of light required for 5 Hawaiian stony corals, 1 soft coral and 1 Tridacna clam, and is intended to complement a previous article “Too Much Light!” (Riddle, 2004a). Those proponents of unlimited photoacclimation by symbiotic zooxanthellae, and hence extreme lighting, will likely be surprised by these findings. And, as a reference, a quick listing of photosynthetic data for other coral/zooxanthellae symbioses from various references is offered at the conclusion of this article.

As with ALL science, subject to revision with new data... ;)

Just another reason nature is err "wrong"?
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,970
Reaction score
3,673
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Forgot link..



 
Last edited:

Shooter6

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 13, 2017
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
1,450
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's the point of the scientific process. Graphs, aren't just made to sell points. They can also plot facts.
If you look up what I said, it's common knowledge graphs are made to highlight selling points.
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's not an answer. I've made graphs and charts for myself to be able to understand data. Charts and graphs can serve multiple purposes. I've seen someone in this forum troll charts and graphs as something akin to fake news because they didn't agree with what the graphs were saying.
 
Last edited:

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very true.

Down on the great barrier reef we did see monti caps and acro fingers poking out of the ocean in places with wave action. No those must have been getting par in the thousands but they were still growing.
So you think that par in the thousands doesn't cause photo inhibition?
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reminds me of one of the most misused photos..
78c32bc3edacc411c8ed3cc28d60d726.jpg
No white. I do you see a lot of yellows oranges reds and purples. Funny, look how blue everything looks in the water. Like, really really blue just an inch below the surface.
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seen or actually dove them? To what depth? How many hrs have you logged? I have over 5000 hrs civilian logged and countless military. Both open and closed circuit. Even mixed gas.

To be honest this discussion has spread over at least 6 other threads now and it's the same on all of them.
You're not being honest. You're exaggerating and trolling.
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You don't go diving with stupid orange lenses on a dive mask to color correct the coral for a reason by the way. That reason is they are not needed, as they are in full spectrum to near full spectrum daylight
From Scuba.com:
"One of the most important things to consider when planning a recreational scuba trip is the dive spot’s visibility. There’s nothing like the awe-inspiring feeling of seeing marine life and corals in their most accurate colors. To truly appreciate these marvels, divers should wear high-quality color corrected scuba masks."
"If clear dive masks can give you decent visibility underwater, why should any diver bother to invest in one with color-correcting filters? The reason we need color corrected scuba masks is simple: The effect of water on light is similar to a giant red filter absorbing red light the deeper you go, leaving visible only the blues and greens of the spectrum. By three meters or 10 feet in depth, there will be no red light left from the sunlight underwater."
redmask.jpg
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
691
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Forgot link..
Interesting data in the article by Dana Riddle. Photoinhibition begins between ~350 to 750 µmol·m²·second, depending on which coral was tested. So much for the "never too much intensity" argument. Since most reef tanks are a mix of corals, it appears that a PAR of just under 350 for the light-loving corals would be the upper goal for all lights, and higher PAR could actually cause some corals to effectively starve due to the shutdown of the photosynthetic process via photoinhibition.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top