Reef Mat - bad motors!

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,481
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve had my red sea reef mat 500 for only 6 months and am now on to my THIRD drive motor! This is ridiculous, but at least Red Sea keeps sending me free replacements. It seems they don’t care to actually solve the issue and prefer to continue replacing with Chinese garbage motors until my warranty runs out and I’m SOL…

Rather than just sitting around angry and annoyed with Red Sea, I’m wondering if I can just find a better motor myself and retrofit it into the reef mat. Anybody been down this road yet?
 

TX_REEF

Kessil Fanboy
View Badges
Joined
Mar 12, 2023
Messages
3,086
Reaction score
3,642
Location
Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A better motor would be great, if you find anything let us know... only things I can think that might help would be reducing the flow rate through the drain to reduce the filtering load or increasing the mat advance length so it does not have to start and stop as often. What's your tank size? I asked because if you have a larger tank maybe the 500 is just being overloaded and you'd be better off with a 1200 which would catch more detritus before advancing the mat. Of course, purchasing a new reefmat is probably not a desirable expense :face-with-tears-of-joy:
 
OP
OP
Formulator

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,481
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks. I have what I would call a “detritus-rich” 140 gallon system. So it very well may be overloaded. I can’t fit a 1200 in my sump without major modifications and cost is a bit prohibitive as well, so I’d prefer to make this 500 work more reliably…
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top