Old tank syndrome is vanquished in reefing now

OP
OP
brandon429

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
30,220
Reaction score
24,063
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I critiqued the big work thread I linked it, asked people to factor the pictures they see/same scrutiny applies to my threads so I don't feel I'm unfair in my assessments, if you have specifics I know you will be able to discern causatives very well you're both welcome to post here for sure. I think you guys write well for cause-and-effect reef analyses.

I did have a couple respondents in private message tell me their reef got invaded again several months after their rip clean

so was that a fail of rip cleaning?

my mind sees it this way: they know how to get back into the good lane when they're done playing around.

they've tasted what total tank control looks like, they're probably not concerned much about getting their reef back as soon as they will it.

I have seen a really good sustain rate for the physical changes mentioned prior for sure.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
24,326
Reaction score
23,111
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
so was that a fail of rip cleaning?
Yes. It is like someone saying a copper treatment for 30 days is all thats needed to prevent disease. In other words,Copper treatment is great, but its not the only thing needed for quarantine). if you tell someone to correct something - then shouldn't part of that correction be what to do to prevent the problems (whatever they are)? BTW - I have no clue how well rip-cleaning does long-term as compared to other methods. I am not going to have a competition with you - analyzing these problems is not a huge interest of mine. My contribution to the thread was very simple: "I wonder what these tanks looks like 3, 6, 9 etc months later.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
again, I'm keeping this thread related to specific pics or threads of outcomes, that is how we keep arguments at bay.
Hi Brandon - you don't need to respond (honestly). You appear to be bumping many of your threads to the top and asking that people only post in agreement to you and that everyone else kindly exit.

It therefore appears that you are asking/demanding that you be free to post advice and opinion at will in threads that you start, without being challenged on any of it.

If that is truly the case, I would suggest that this is not the proper venue. A personal site or blog is more suitable for broadcasting your thoughts, ideas, and opinions without challenge.

Happy reefing.
 
OP
OP
brandon429

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
30,220
Reaction score
24,063
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Please let that be your final parting shot here.

Back to work:

Friends who read to contribute to tank rehab science-
More rehab jobs are in the works in chat. With each post example added/ the resulting bump/ new work requests are made in chat it's a very productive wheel.

Some of these are pretty substantial tank moves and relocations, things like this recent one:



Those jobs are logged because they're on- demand work jobs completed. We can follow up with the owners updates to track rip clean patterning.

I'm asking for work load jobs, not external critique for pages.

What I'm requesting here and what's helpful and pertinent to the thread would be rounding up tank transfer jobs or tank rescue jobs to work live time.


If someone else wants to use a competing method, by all means do and we'll log that outcome for comparison.

As long as we're doing actual live time tank work, like was completed above recently using just this method here, that's what the thread is about.

Debating over analyst's different cause and effect passions isn't the focus of the thread. We're an example- based thread.

His use of our method here in this thread wasn't to rescue a challenge tank, it was to skip cycle transfer a full reef into a new reef tank.

But he did what we do here: rip cleaning reverses old tank syndrome

rip cleaning fixes many reef tank invasion issues

rip cleaning can be used by an unlimited number of readers to skip cycle transfer their entire reef any way they'd like to handle it, using no testing for cycle params.

We demonstrate a method of required reef tank compliance. I have the right to build up that method in peace here and solely focus on our results: are they good or bad results

For long term tracking subscribe to those tank owners for post updates on the rip clean tank.
 
Last edited:

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
24,326
Reaction score
23,111
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Please let that be your final parting shot here.

Back to work:

Friends who read to contribute to tank rehab science-
More rehab jobs are in the works in chat. With each post example added/ the resulting bump/ new work requests are made in chat it's a very productive wheel.

Some of these are pretty substantial tank moves and relocations, things like this recent one:



Those jobs are logged because they're on- demand work jobs completed. We can follow up with the owners updates to track rip clean patterning.

I'm asking for work load jobs, not external critique for pages.

What I'm requesting here and what's helpful and pertinent to the thread would be rounding up tank transfer jobs or tank rescue jobs to work live time.


If someone else wants to use a competing method, by all means do and we'll log that outcome for comparison.

As long as we're doing actual live time tank work, like was completed above recently using just this method here, that's what the thread is about.

Debating over analyst's different cause and effect passions isn't the focus of the thread. We're an example- based thread.

His use of our method here in this thread wasn't to rescue a challenge tank, it was to skip cycle transfer a full reef into a new reef tank.

But he did what we do here: rip cleaning reverses old tank syndrome

rip cleaning fixes many reef tank invasion issues

rip cleaning can be used by an unlimited number of readers to skip cycle transfer their entire reef any way they'd like to handle it, using no testing for cycle params.

We demonstrate a method of required reef tank compliance. I have the right to build up that method in peace here and solely focus on our results: are they good or bad results

For long term tracking subscribe to those tank owners for post updates on the rip clean tank.
Ok - so it's unclear to whom this was asked/stated - but - all I asked is what is the medium to long-term prognosis for these tanks? I thought someone would know. The title of this thread does not say 'post your rip clean results' it says old tank syndrome is vanquished. Your intial post in the thread is not what you said above - and it is a discussion forum. Remember - any post you want to report - thats what mods, etc are for.
 
OP
OP
brandon429

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
30,220
Reaction score
24,063
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If I discuss anything at all with you, or answer sincerely, an argument will ensue due to back and forth until my thread is closed- that's already been done in my simple live rock skip cycle thread that was harming nobody. Five years of work



first four years, peace

Good jobs all centered around one theme on file, thankful and happy reef owners.

the last five pages, once I responded? Pure attack, but the responses were just too harsh= so closed





I'd like a different outcome here, and for the rest of my threads. The only option I can do is not respond, I'm that restricted.

Onto poor river management:
20241005_081305.jpg




To readers willing to investigate alternate, uncommon methods and claims and patterning in Old Tank Syndrome biology, using my lens-


I wanted to show you a natural eutrophic setting I just saw while blasting an ebike down a trail like a madman.

Some of you have planted tanks like this. Handy natural comparison



The could-be-beautiful but as usual underfunded/undermaintained Lady Bird Lake (Colorado River portion of downtown Austin)
20241005_081301.jpg

These folks are kayaking in moneran utopia, several dogs are lost each summer here.

A blue- green sheen is developing, it'll look dyed by noon. Fascinating combo of:

Flow path bottle necking slowing throughput

Choking hydrillas and various invasive plants


a degree of garbage has compounded in the slow flow, extreme silt at the bottom. I expect hydrogen sulfide pocketing 100%, there are gas zones in this bog river bed that can kill, no joke
20241005_081044.jpg

Extreme temps

this river section is eutrophic, it needs remediation. They've slowed it, but that's like someone lightly topically cleaning a sludge tank, leaving the thick protein sheen on top as proof of missed organics to remove

That's why all our work is for disassembly- cleaning examples, we investigate only that method as applied to reef tank lifespan control.



Extreme direct light, nutrient compounding, and no natural removal actions are coming due in that river

It'll compound until they're forced to act, it's that simple.


Did you know readers that it's possible to rip clean entire sections of a river? Or an entire city lake? There are companies that do what we do on a large scale, it's searchable. Sometimes they drain, scrape, refill. Like we do

They install dyes sometimes, post rip clean, that alter light band penetrance % to slow algae growths in places of no shade... they modulate light power, sludge rate, flow pathing for temp control, and + oxygenation rates in cleaned up lakes using air stones the size of two barrel drums. That's fascinating in my opinion, and a fitting example here



Where we use common peroxide, they use blaster power potassium permanganate and other strong oxidizers to hammer down organics into an easily- removable suspended pulp, then they remove those aggregated solids somehow


Our opening paragraph and all following examples added (within the accepted scope of this thread) are aimed at complete removal of aggregated and suspended solid waste in order to arrest the eutrophic condition, and force in the oligotrophic one.

I wouldn't get wet in Lady Bird lake for anything less than a fee of six hundred dollars

Predicted coliform count, any ole' day we want to check: will be gut-busting high.

Double my fee. There's so much intestine bacteria in here I'll require twelve hundred dollars to submerge in the very waters fellow Austinites will happily recreate in, free of charge.


Hey is anyone reading out on the trail today??? Look for an ebiker thumb swiping near zilker

20241005_081044.jpg



20241005_081051.jpg




At the end of that long trail:

20241005_094515.jpg
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
brandon429

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
30,220
Reaction score
24,063
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MN there is one communication pathway I'll always keep open for you, I give you my word we can have a yearslong discussion thread where I'm fully engaged once you make a thread about old tank syndrome

In your way


And run it out with some examples, and different findings.

Then you bring those findings and post them here, I'll be very happy and that's the language nobody can argue with. Just examples, and patterns you've found, that are different from mine.

Our theories don't align, for sure

Now show us how patterns in OTS tank fixing biology are different, use recent examples.

gotta fix some tanks, using a better way...That's what we did here the whole time. It's our language, a reflection on patterns from jobs we did or noted

‐‐------------- 10/15/24

This job was interesting because it is still live running, on demand remote tank cpr is underway using our methods collected here (it's not a wrecked tank it's a seam-break pre move transfer


Wanted to show how the exact steps we use to completely rip clean eutrophic tanks into oligotrophic ones, can be used to life preserve an already oligotrophic tank should an emergency need arise

It's application here:

-the study of reef tank cpr predictability. Per that thread, did the reef tank in question produce the predicted results? Finality not attained yet as of today; that tub isn't the final vessel for his reef he'll need to run another skip cycle transfer soon

-we did dental work on his algae spots, that's preemptive reef tank dentistry demonstrated.

- this elemental reduction is how we control old tank syndrome; we either clean out or totally replace all surrounding biofilter surface area beyond the scope of this core heartbeat material he's keeping alive using the rules of OTS reversal/ control.

-Heck, why not show at least once a perfectly positive tank, being kept positive, by the harshest action in reefing (an instant rip clean, no warning) per old cycling science rules (by instantly removing all core surrounding surfaces area, we are at risk of cycle crash they claim)

We will see, the job isn't done yet, that rip cleans refresh, reinvigorate, and renew via increased feed input allowance quite a boost of coral mass. We didn't lose quality of reef during holding: we gained positive mass. We used this as an exercise in protein/clean food recycling to build coral mass. His whole reef is currently in an exercise program that will leave it stronger for the new final tank because we're feed/ water changing using flushing science. Our whole thread here is flushing and reduction environmental science.
 
Last edited:

Garf

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
5,751
Reaction score
6,706
Location
BEEFINGHAM
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the last five pages, once I responded? Pure attack, but the responses were just too harsh= so closed
Not how I remember it, lol;

 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
24,326
Reaction score
23,111
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Not how I remember it, lol;

@brandon429 - disagreement is not 'attack'. And - asking a question is not 'attack'. If you have felt attacked by me - I apologize sincerely. And - in fact - we agree on most things - so I'm not sure where/why this topic was resurrected in my notifications.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
24,326
Reaction score
23,111
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
MN there is one communication pathway I'll always keep open for you, I give you my word we can have a yearslong discussion thread where I'm fully engaged once you make a thread about old tank syndrome

In your way


And run it out with some examples, and different findings.

Then you bring those findings and post them here, I'll be very happy and that's the language nobody can argue with. Just examples, and patterns you've found, that are different from mine.

Our theories don't align, for sure

Now show us how patterns in OTS tank fixing biology are different, use recent examples.

gotta fix some tanks, using a better way...That's what we did here the whole time. It's our language, a reflection on patterns from jobs we did or noted
By the way - I have always said - if you have a problem with something I've posted - merely report it. I think it's somewhat unfair to blame me for getting your thread closed - and if I remember - there were a number of disagreements with various people about the topic. However - Were I to start the thread you requested - I would want to know 'what is your definition of old tank syndrome' - it seems vague, probably is a synonym for 'poor maintenence' - and the solution is 'better maintenence'. But - since I am not sure - IDK - So- IF you're saying cleaning rocks, etc is vanquishing old tank syndrome - you're probably right - i.e. doing maintenance that should have been done all along.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top