Minerals out of whack after cycle and water change

drjreber

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Messages
21
Reaction score
46
Location
Indiana, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello. I just finished cycling my Biocube 32. I used bottle bacteria (two brands) and fed it one round of ammonium chloride. Cycle went pretty much as expected over the course of 17 days -- ammonia and Nitrite were at 0 (with API) and at 0 and 0.2 using Salifert, respectively. Nitrate was over 100, according to Salifert test. Decided that meant I should do a big water change, so removed about 90% of the water and replaced it with freshly mixed Instant Ocean Reef Crystals. Adjusted salinity to 1.025 at 80 degrees and added it to the tank. Today, I tested all of the other parameters. All tests Salifert unless otherwise stated.
Sal and temp same as yesterday (1.025 and 80 degrees)
pH 8.2
Phos 0.01
Alk 10.1
Nitrate 25
Nitrite 0.25
Ammonia 0
Mg 30
Ca 100

I am puzzled by the Nitrite and Nitrate levels. Where did an increase in Nitrite come from, and is 25 ppm too high for nitrates until my next water change (assuming that doesn't make things worse).

I am even more frustrated by the Mg and Ca levels. I am a scientist by training, so I know I did the titrations for Ca and Mg correctly. I retested both many times, and even had a senior biology research major run the Ca test to be certain I wasn't just having a brain burp. I have no idea why the levels are so low or how to fix them - I have fish and crabs coming tomorrow (fish going into copper quarantine, hermit crabs will be gently scrubbed with DI water and released into this tank).

Anyone have any ideas of what is wrong (tests or reef mix) and how to fix it rather quickly?

Thanks!
 

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
30,220
Reaction score
24,063
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Truly you need a second confirming test reading for the calcium and alk. A different brand ran and compared, not just that kit reran to state accuracy

That reading is suspect because it doesn't mix to that out of the bag it's unlikely compared to the degree of misreads on file between two different test kit types. It's more likely a kit quality error than io being-300 off in calcium for recently purchased and used io brand salt
 

KrisReef

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
15,227
Reaction score
31,279
Location
ADX Florence
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Assuming that you mixed with RODI water and not tap?

I agree something is wrong with Mg and Ca results, hopefully the test kits are off.
 
OP
OP
drjreber

drjreber

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Messages
21
Reaction score
46
Location
Indiana, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Haha-Yes, reading kits correctly. Waiting for new kits and will retest. I live in a very rural area and Instant Ocean is pretty much the only saltwater supplies my LFS sells.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Haha-Yes, reading kits correctly. Waiting for new kits and will retest. I live in a very rural area and Instant Ocean is pretty much the only saltwater supplies my LFS sells.

Ok, because it is not uncommon for folks getting very low values to read the volume left in the syringe instead of the volume added. This misunderstanding seems confined to the Salifert kits.
 

Mr. Mojo Rising

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
8,632
Location
Toronto
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Personally I would call this a cycled tank. API often shows some amount of ammonia or nitrite, it’s not uncommon and nothing to get alarms about.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top