- Joined
- Jul 16, 2009
- Messages
- 5,071
- Reaction score
- 8,108
I have seen you repeat over and over that you don't use "scare tactics" to promote your ideas... telling every new reef keeper that all their fish are going to die certainly feels like a scare tactic. I am not sure that is needed to get the point across that QT is an important topic.no disease plan, wing it? still read the disease forum. fish losses in early 2025 will not be due to a parameter you can test, it'll be the need for fallow and qt.
"cycling" and "QT" are two different things. Relabeling them and combining them does not change the advice.old school cycling does not discuss or even consider fish disease, that's why it's dangerous.
Quarantine and preventing disease transfer have been a topic for as long as I have owned fish, fresh or salt.... and that pre-dates you by a decade or two, at least. The point being that I think that your continued use of language like this is more confusing to people than it is helpful. There is no "old school" vs "new school" in this sense. QT is and always was important and cycling still works the same way it always did.
Note: Posted edited to be clearer
Last edited: