Bottled Bacteria, AquaBiomics. Just what's in your bottles

OP
OP
Solo McReefer

Solo McReefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
1,188
Location
Sacramento
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't want Pohl's team sending German ninjas to my house at 3am

"Is it safe?"
th-51201257.jpg
 
OP
OP
Solo McReefer

Solo McReefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
1,188
Location
Sacramento
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if the enzymes in MB7 are the same ones used in laundry detergents.
I don't think there are enzymes in Microbacter7

The bacteria would have them, of course

Should be called MicroBacter3. Three species of non pathogenic, normally soil, and spore forming bacillus

That are used in pharmaceutical, waste management, and other industries

Pretty sure, B subtilis makes the active ingredient in Neosporin. Please correct me, if I'm wrong here
 

Dan_P

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
7,571
Reaction score
7,962
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Pretty sure, B subtilis makes the active ingredient in Neosporin. Please correct me, if I'm wrong here

Actually, the contents are

Bacitracin Zinc (400 units)First aid antibiotic
Neomycin Sulfate (3.5 mg)First aid antibiotic
Polymyxin B sulfate (5,000 units)First aid antibiotic
 

telegraham

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
590
Reaction score
795
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm interested in hearing how they identify good strains vs bad. It's not rhetorical, but I also do not have the time to chase down and debate things that should be stated up front by anyone making such claims. I'd certainly read it if it was in a concise place to read, as opposed to watching videos looking for nuggets of info.

Except for suspected pathogens and bacteria associated with BJD, I don't see Aquabiomics addressing good or bad bacteria on their web site..
I find it so interesting that you have time to share here, yet no time to seek answers where answers can be found. Smells like words for the sake of words.

Because I'm handy with copy/paste, I've shared your thoughts with those who can actually help.
 

telegraham

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
590
Reaction score
795
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What does this even mean? Is Pseudomonas a important strain to be dominant in our tanks? If so, why? For what reason ? Is it just important for basic nitrification for just fish (subject has been beaten to death and revived every year with the same outcome) ? What about for coral? Which strains are important to have? Whats the baseline for those with long term successful tanks. Until people become educated with all these strains and their effects as long as well as methods on how to make corrections. I don't see how knowing any of this can be useful. I'm extremely interested in being more educated on the subject but it is difficult to get past a million people chiming in with some ammonia riff raff when the word bacteria is mentioned.
The point of the share is to indicate that it's possible that BioDigest is sourced differently than other bottled juices. It's an outlier.

Why are you asking questions where they can't be answered?
 

GlassMunky

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
4,409
Location
NJ-Philly Burbs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I find it so interesting that you have time to share here, yet no time to seek answers where answers can be found. Smells like words for the sake of words.

Because I'm handy with copy/paste, I've shared your thoughts with those who can actually help.
Ive also noticed this as well. Hes able to respond to threads here on this forum all day every day yet cant be bothered to google something that takes 5 minutes.
Seems like theres almost some contempt for these people and like hes better than them because he reads stuff and they make videos.....
Its almost like he doesnt actually want to engage and the "i dont watch videos, i only read real science articles" is his way of saying that exact thing.....
 

Doctorgori

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
5,861
Reaction score
8,159
Location
Myrtle Beach
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Also that I'm finding this hobby strange in that we are so focused on proving labels right or wrong.
I get it but that Vibrant thread was both useful and entertaining … besides I can admit to being a sucker for at least a few G’s of fish gear , so I shamelessly participate in every torch and pitchfork vendor roast I can find
I tried to get others that were suffering from torch coral loss to try the PNS bacteria or crt concoction but ultimately evertime they seemed to just jump right into the antibiotics train because of social media.

Take it with a grain of salt.
which is exactly what I’m doing now, you mind if I pm you so as not to detour this thread? but I’m loosing euphillia by the hundreds of dollars
But the complication that is beyond their reach is that conditions act as triggers for otherwise harmless vibrio hanging out in the coral community to turn on lots of pathogenic traits and become virulent.
Like when temps go above 78F … I kept seahorses and that seemed to be vibrios magic number (in combo with marginal water quality)
In the particular case of arcobacter, we actually have protocols with cipro and oxalinic acid that seem capable of eliminating arcobacter, while leaving the rest of the community testing as basically normal.
Hope you don’t mind a pm, I could use references and links as I have recently obtained both meds and could use some wisdom

pardon me
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,970
Reaction score
10,747
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I thought this was interesting, just as some context for hobbyists, on how bacteria are selected and sourced.

I'm not singling this out for criticism - I'm pointing it out because I think people have a picture that each company is culturing their own stuff.
And this is far likelier to be the situation.
(exceptions for the Phyto-like PNS, it's cultured and they tell you how you can culture it yourself. @telegraham would point out that the downside here is that PNS is far from pure culture.)


Transcript of a couple of minutes...


Q: does does any of your bacteria contain the uh rhodopseudomonas
A: Not to my knowledge
31:04
Q: okay and then um Andy's wondering do your products contain Marine bacteria?
31:13
A: no... they're not they're not Marine specific they're kind of I believe I would I would term them euryhaline they can handle salinity up to well over 40 parts per thousand and much much lower than that and most people are not going to be unless they're doing a Red Sea biotope. They're not keeping their salinity at 40 or 42 or something like this they're going to be keeping it more in the 34 to 36 range. The bacteria are totally capable of handling anything from 40 on down to very low salinity.

Q: can you share the bacteria that are in your products or is it...
A: no
31:56
Q: so the next follow-up question is going to be um how do you pick those bacteria
32:03
A: I don't do it by myself I don't try to reinvent the wheel I speak with a number of of authorities in the world of dealing with bacteria and especially in aquaculture because aquaculture systems tend to be like cesspools uh they are very bacterial rich. Unless you're running a really aggressive Turf scrubber type of a of a setup uh you have massive amounts of bacteria that's been studied and studied and studied and studied and so you speak with people who know more than you do. That's the answer to that question.

Q: and and the reason why you don't um reveal the types of bacteria or we see other companies reveal types of bacterias it's proprietary right?
32:50
A: absolutely yeah there's a lot that that I'm really transparent about but stuff like that that that is what I would consider a trade secret and that's not something that I'm willing to share.
 

AquaBiomics

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
402
Reaction score
1,671
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ive also noticed this as well. Hes able to respond to threads here on this forum all day every day yet cant be bothered to google something that takes 5 minutes.
Seems like theres almost some contempt for these people and like hes better than them because he reads stuff and they make videos.....
Its almost like he doesnt actually want to engage and the "i dont watch videos, i only read real science articles" is his way of saying that exact thing.....
You have it exactly right.

One might wonder why a trained chemist would spend so little time reading the scientific literature to answer his questions, and instead complains on a forum.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
8,108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am not going to wade into the fray/barbs toward Randy other than saying that I do 100% identify with not watching videos for stuff like this. I absolutely loathe the format, fluff, endless and mindless bloviation, ad role, pandering for likes and subscribes, time wasting intro sequences, etc. It is not that there is anything wrong with it and most people appear to like consuming content like that. However, it is just not for me. Short concise and informative videos are fine, but for technical stuff I like to read.
 

Garf

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
5,751
Reaction score
6,706
Location
BEEFINGHAM
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I find it so interesting that you have time to share here, yet no time to seek answers where answers can be found. Smells like words for the sake of words.

Because I'm handy with copy/paste, I've shared your thoughts with those who can actually help.
Ive also noticed this as well. Hes able to respond to threads here on this forum all day every day yet cant be bothered to google something that takes 5 minutes.
Seems like theres almost some contempt for these people and like hes better than them because he reads stuff and they make videos.....
Its almost like he doesnt actually want to engage and the "i dont watch videos, i only read real science articles" is his way of saying that exact thing.....
You have it exactly right.

One might wonder why a trained chemist would spend so little time reading the scientific literature to answer his questions, and instead complains on a forum.
So, is there Googleable information on good Vs bad? I don't mean just stopping at the first search that suits ones own thoughts, I mean real info. It's been a long time admittedly, but when looking for interactions between algal exudates and bacteria, there were so many contradictions, so little aragocrete information. You could just post a link that us simple folk could biodigest, if you don't mind.
 

AquaBiomics

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
402
Reaction score
1,671
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So, is there Googleable information on good Vs bad? I don't mean just stopping at the first search that suits ones own thoughts, I mean real info. It's been a long time admittedly, but when looking for interactions between algal exudates and bacteria, there were so many contradictions, so little aragocrete information. You could just post a link that us simple folk could biodigest, if you don't mind.
I mean no offense at all, because it wasnt your phrasing originally anyway. But this distinction "good vs bad" is oversimplified to the point of being misleading. There is not a scientific study that identitifies "good" versus "bad" bacteria.

I reject the framing, as would any microbiologist.

We can identify bacteria that have specific activities. The client may consider some of those activities useful or desirable.

We can identify bacteria that are known to be pathogens, or otherwise associated with disease. Most clients would find this to be "bad". I recently analyzed some bacterial cultures for a biologist colleague; he was thrilled to find that some of them were known coral pathogens. Good or bad is in the eye of the beholder.

I don't mean to dodge the question, but I'm not aware of a good, digestable overview of all marine microbes and their functions. Its just too big a question to be answered in even a book. I suggest that if we want to really ask and answer questions like this, they need to be a lot more specific.

e.g. What benefits might the Pelagibacteraceae have for our reef tanks? What kinds of microbes are oxidizing nitrite in our tanks? etc. If the question is phrased at the level of specific families or functions, its answerable.
 

Garf

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
5,751
Reaction score
6,706
Location
BEEFINGHAM
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Dom

Full Time Reef Keeper
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
6,945
Location
NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am not going to wade into the fray/barbs toward Randy other than saying that I do 100% identify with not watching videos for stuff like this. I absolutely loathe the format, fluff, endless and mindless bloviation, ad role, pandering for likes and subscribes, time wasting intro sequences, etc. It is not that there is anything wrong with it and most people appear to like consuming content like that. However, it is just not for me. Short concise and informative videos are fine, but for technical stuff I like to read.

Yes; I am 100% on board with this.

Between advertisements, fancy video effects and a general motivation to generate likes, I find video to be a waste of time.

Just cut to the chase and give me the information I need, nothing more, thank you.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top