Alright dude, seems like you got it all figured out. I’ll work on my scientific wording…. Glad we could all agree it’s a Worm….I'm not offended or upset. I just think that you're using words wrong, and I'm attempting to educate you.
OP did not (that I'm aware of) claim that this was specifically a "Common Bristle Worm". They correctly called it a "bristle worm".
Bristle worm is the common name for all polychaete worms. Polychaete worms are a specific class in animal identification. The "Common Bristle Worm", the "Fire Worm", and the "Bobbit Worm" are all species which belong to this class. They are all bristle worms. That is a fact.
As far as I can tell, you were the one that first asserted that the worm in the video was a "Common Bristle Worm" and then you blamed that assertion on OP, after which you immediately claimed that OP was wrong about it being a "Common Bristle Worm" (even though they never said it, you did), and then you corrected them and claimed with confidence that it was specifically the species "Eunice aphrodiois".
Lets say that I drive a car. If I said, "Is this a car?" to you, would you reply with, "That's not a car, that's a Ford!"? Of course not. Same deal here. I would be correct to identify my car as a car, even if it is actually a Ford.
But also, you can't know that this is specifically "Eunice aphroditois", because you don't know how many other polychaete worms have powerful jaws. There could be hundreds or thousands of different species with jaws like that. So you shouldn't claim with any confidence to have the single correct answer.