Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a pump that will flush the membrane automatically, so the membrane is still in great shape because of that pump. I've been running the same membrane for a year and still coming out between 6 to 15. The DI then takes care of the rest.That's what I was thinking but I guess with water coming out high out of the membrane the RO gets used up quickly?
Depends on if you want to spend extra for a 99% rejection membrane. I run a spectrapure 99% rejection rated membrane and I get tds of 3 to 4 after the membrane and my tap is usually over 400. A stock membrane should get you around 97 to 99% rejection rate. Whatever you get, just make sure you get a matching flow restrictor.Since this is somewhat relevant and to not start a new thread -- any ideas on running two 75 gpd membranes (water saver kit) with ro smart buddy booster pump versus running a single 150 gpd, or even 100 gpd membrane with ro buddy booster pump? Debating taking down my water saver kit and going back to single membrane but not sure the best option.
Seems like consensus is not to run these dual membrane systems. The ro buddy has a built in 300 flow restrictor. Any ideas which single membrane would work with it with tap tds of 200?
I have a pump that will flush the membrane automatically, so the membrane is still in great shape because of that pump. I've been running the same membrane for a year and still coming out between 6 to 15. The DI then takes care of the rest.
I don't know this answered the question unless I'm not understanding what you're writing. Was wondering whether two 75 gpd membranes in series is a better option than a single 150 gpd membrane on its own. In the past, I had upgraded the 75 to a 150 by adding a water saver kit, although I'm not entirely sure I need two membranes. Maybe it's better to have a single membrane rated at higher gpd than two smaller membranes? The second membrane usually gets hit with TDS water higher than the source water given that its fed by waste water from membrane 1, right?Depends on if you want to spend extra for a 99% rejection membrane. I run a spectrapure 99% rejection rated membrane and I get tds of 3 to 4 after the membrane and my tap is usually over 400. A stock membrane should get you around 97 to 99% rejection rate. Whatever you get, just make sure you get a matching flow restrictor.
Flushing the membrane really doesn't do much. My membrane is 3 or 4 years old and I'm getting 4 after the membrane and that is with 400 tap tds.I have a pump that will flush the membrane automatically, so the membrane is still in great shape because of that pump. I've been running the same membrane for a year and still coming out between 6 to 15. The DI then takes care of the rest.
If you are wanting to stay at 150, I would go with just the one membrane. The membrane from BRS says it has a 98% rejection so you should get a tds of 4 after the membrane with your 200tds tap. As you stated, with your dual 75 you are sending even more polluted water to the second membrane which will shorten its live over the 1st membrane. If saving water is your main concern, then stick with your current setup or invest in one that does 1:1 rejection.I don't know this answered the question unless I'm not understanding what you're writing. Was wondering whether two 75 gpd membranes in series is a better option than a single 150 gpd membrane on its own. In the past, I had upgraded the 75 to a 150 by adding a water saver kit, although I'm not entirely sure I need two membranes. Maybe it's better to have a single membrane rated at higher gpd than two smaller membranes? The second membrane usually gets hit with TDS water higher than the source water given that its fed by waste water from membrane 1, right?
Or is this because the lower gpd membranes tend to have a higher rejection rate so it's easier on your DI stage following? In this sense, would it still be worth taking down the water saver kit, changing the dual 75 membranes to a single high rejection 90 or 100 gpd membrane?
Wondering which direction you'd go with this. I'm kind of wondering what the point of the water saver kits are after thinking about this more.
Flushing the membrane really doesn't do much. My membrane is 3 or 4 years old and I'm getting 4 after the membrane and that is with 400 tap tds.
Vegas has tap water that is over 550, a lot of times closer to 600, so flushing makes a huge difference. Like BZOFIQ mentioned, it eliminates TDS creep and DI last longer. I have 3 RO units in my house, 1 in the kitchen, 1 in my Bar and 1 for my aquariums. None will run 0 TDS due to the bad water quality here. That's why I use DI media in all of my RO units.Flushing the membrane really doesn't do much. My membrane is 3 or 4 years old and I'm getting 4 after the membrane and that is with 400 tap tds.
Are you talking about flushing the membrane or initially by-passing the DI when you start up the unit, which is not flushing. I see flushing used all the time on here but they actually mean by-passing the DI.Vegas has tap water that is over 550, a lot of times closer to 600, so flushing makes a huge difference. Like BZOFIQ mentioned, it eliminates TDS creep and DI last longer. I have 3 RO units in my house, 1 in the kitchen, 1 in my Bar and 1 for my aquariums. None will run 0 TDS due to the bad water quality here. That's why I use DI media in all of my RO units.
Are you talking about flushing the membrane or initially by-passing the DI when you start up the unit, which is not flushing. I see flushing used all the time on here but they actually mean by-passing the DI.
Russ @Buckeye Hydro has a good post on this from a few years ago.
Let's Talk RO & RODI
I wanted to introduce, or re-introduce some common jargon pertaining to RO and RODI systems that few people in the hobby commonly use. PERMEATE - the water that has made its way through the RO membrane. Often called "RO water." In most situations, the TDS of permeate should be 5% or less of...www.reef2reef.com
What are you trying to accomplish by flushing?I do both...via couple of automated solenoids
Thanks for this! I have a question on the flow restrictor. If I can keep using the RO buddy it has a built in 300 flow restrictor. Should I add an additional flow restrictor at the membrane to get an added total of whatever number is recommended for the membrane size?If you are wanting to stay at 150, I would go with just the one membrane. The membrane from BRS says it has a 98% rejection so you should get a tds of 4 after the membrane with your 200tds tap. As you stated, with your dual 75 you are sending even more polluted water to the second membrane which will shorten its live over the 1st membrane. If saving water is your main concern, then stick with your current setup or invest in one that does 1:1 rejection.
What i mean is that would you still consider its flow restrictor and add a smaller in line one, like a 550 ml restrictor barrel for a total 850 ml restrictor? Or maybe they don't work that way.Those weeny prefilters on an RO Buddy really aren't a good match for a 150 gpd membrane.