YOUR CURIOUSLY INNOCENT NEGLIGENCE

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Battlecorals

Aquazic Culzure
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
17,305
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
2   0   0



I still spend a lot of time on the phone with fellow reefers who are having problems of the worst possible kind - and by that I mean - “head scratchers”. These are the issues where somewhere in your prized coral collection, one or more of them is acting very odd, looking bad and out of sorts, or just plain dying on you for “no apparent reason”. You have been throwing anything and everything you can come up with at the wall to see what sticks in an effort to find a solution, more often than not, compounding a problem far beyond its initial quell.


Trust me, I have been there myself more times than I’d like to admit, but it is a feeling of helpless frustration and deflation that will suck all the enthusiasm you have for your reef right out, one billowing gasp at a time. When I think of some of the outlandish “causes” of my tanks grief over the years and just how far I reached to come up with a solution for them, it’s a hilariously painful picture of desperation at its worst.






7-Eleven-fuel-app_zpswi3pgyl4.jpg





The go too cause, and this poor guy really gets it bad sometimes, as he’s “been a scapegoat” for anything any everything that may go wrong, is stray voltage. Any time a polyp is retracted or maybe a tip looses a hint of color. “Must be stray voltage” we tell ourselves. This is perhaps the most accessible and most miss understood excuse we've got by far, and I’m quite confident it is rarely, if ever, the root of any issue that it’s being blamed for.






stray-voltage-graphic-300x234_zps6bfujncf.jpg

Don't you look at me!




A close second to stray voltage is always the salt. I totally get why. It’s so convenient, and again very accessible. I mean “must be a bad batch right”? We are probably all guilty of blaming our salt at one point or another. But like stray voltage, salt is usually innocent, and barring user error, once again is very rarely the cause of the “head scratcher”.


Once you start ruling out the larger variables is when you really come up with some good “stuff”. I was once so convinced that my plastic troughs were leaching “something” into my system, that I literally uprooted the entire system, consisting of multiple tanks, and then painstakingly swapped each tank out for glass. This was an amazingly unnecessary effort that caused me far more problems than it solved, but is again just blaring example of the lengths we go to “fix” a problem we do not know the cause of.


What about metals? Copper especially gets the blame all to often as well. While there may be some merit to metal toxicity concerns, I think that unless you’ve got a direct smoking gun, like an actual piece of metal in the tank, or something of that nature, this would also be unwarranted. However finding something such as an actual piece of metal or a battery - or something else foreign - would negate the “head scratcher” predication anyway, and is actually quite welcome in this instance. Discovering the “smoking gun” is the best thing that can happen to a reefer in the throes of a “head scratcher” as it immediately identifies the cause. Unfortunately we aren't usually that lucky, and now, with recent testing methods like Triton, we’ve got the ability to single out individual elements as teeny tiny would be “smoking guns”! Tin and lithium come to mind as the two most found elements in excessive amounts - also unfounded it seems, as well. And while I won’t argue that ICP testing can be very helpful in diagnosing more minute issues, these discrepancies are more often smaller symptoms and not necessarily the root of the real problem.






transitionmetals_zpsepuagrgq.jpg




So then what are we missing? We have been banging our head against the wall and throwing every possible morsel of an idea we can think of at the issue for much too long. In all that brain busting and troubleshooting: voltage, salt, rust, low nutrients, high nutrients, gfo on, gfo off, bottles of this, and bottles of that, for whatever promised solution, inhale, pellets in, pellets out, lights too high, lights too low, spectrum, intensity, duration!!! And the list just goes on and on, and it gets more and more preposterous the longer we are at it.


I am asking, what is the single most obvious and “in our faces” component of our systems? It’s water. Simply put. The main ingredient, and perhaps the most overlooked cause of the “head scratcher” is and might always be, H2o and how effectively we are filtering it.






water-321524_960_720_zpsxevspixy.jpg

It's WATER!





I have found, or I should say, have been pummeled over the years by the fact that when we have a fully functioning and optimized RO/DI, not only do we seem to experience less of some of the trivial issues that plague reefers early on, but when we do have larger problems, the troubleshooting process is simplified further because we can rule out such a large variable right off the bat. In other words, if I am 100% confident that my water is not causing the problem, then I can start to rule other things out pretty quickly. If a poorly functioning ROI/DI filter has been passing any unwanted molecules into your system, it can be a very tough thing to try and diagnose or zero in on. And what’s worse is, that our primary defense against unknown problems is water changes, which in the event of some form of contamination - no matter how small - will only serve to exacerbate the issues further, thus creating an even worse state, a sort of “frenzied head scratcher”! No one deserves that kind of abuse.



How many of you can rule out your water at the first sign of an issue, and how many of you feel that your RO/DI is performing exactly the way it should be?





IMG_9600_zpsbuyyw0dt.jpg




The next time you find yourself up against the wall, having exhausted every possible solution to your current “head scratcher”, I implore you, please consider and examine your RO/DI thoroughly. Make sure your pre filters are functioning properly, as each one serves to prepare the water for the next stage. A weak link anywhere in that chain can cause your membrane to foul or worse. Remember that the amount of pure water you make is not the amount that passes through the pre-filters. You have to account for the waste as well. Seems obvious enough, but believe me, this gets overlooked more often that you might think. A 10,000 gallon designation on a carbon block does not mean 10,000 gallons of pure water. Also, make sure that your waste ratio is at least 3:1 preferably 4:1. Know what your tap water TDS is, and what the TDS of your membrane output is. This will tell you how well your membrane is functioning.


It can be very easy to take your RO/DI for granted and assume it will always work the way its supposed to, but our filters need us a much as we need them. I see a properly functioning RO/DI unit as perhaps, the single most important piece of equipment we use. The filter needs as much attention and proper care as the tanks inhabitants do. And maybe I am sensationalizing a little here, but if the number of people I’ve managed to help out over years by just opening their eyes a little wider to, and paying just a little more attention to their RO/DI systems, tells me anything, it’s that for long term success in the hobby, a proper functioning RO/DI system and good understanding of how it works is absolutely essential.



 
Last edited:

Abhishek

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
3,173
Reaction score
4,882
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Awesome Adam !!! Love the thread .
Well, I was in the camp of blaming nutrients and using GFO and carbon vigorously until you instructed me otherwise . Really , we or rather newbies like me , always miss the obvious . Follow the K.I.S.S method .
Thanks for helping me come to my senses and look beyond the blue and purple bottles !!!

Regards,
Abhishek
 

star fawkes

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
142
Reaction score
103
Location
Hinesville GA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I agree. I think I've avoided many many problems that I see popping up all the time for others because I have a 6 stage RO/DI and use NSF storage tanks.
 

Arron209

Acroholic
View Badges
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
504
Reaction score
338
Location
Modesto
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
+1 on checking the RO/DI. I remember having a bit of stn on my acros a while back and it went away as soon as I changed out my filters.
 

Maacc

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
1,598
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You have definitely done an amazing job helping lots of people, myself amongst them. I remember pulling my hair out, what little I have, months ago trying to nail down the problem.
A sincere thank you from all of us that you have given your time to help.
 
OP
OP
Battlecorals

Battlecorals

Aquazic Culzure
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
17,305
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
If your getting 0 tds, then how are you suppose to know when to change the filters?

Great question. The pre filters do not affect tds at all so you cant really use tds as a gauge on when to replace them unfortunately. I used to play it super safe and replace my carbon blocks every month or two at the most. My water is super high in chlorine and I am forever paranoid. But now with the new system I have a few better mechanisms in place to help prolong the prefilters, so the jury is still out on when I'll need to replace these 20 inchers. lol However it's really very relative to the amount of water you make, and if you are on a well, or municipal water.

Good carbon blocks are pretty inexpensive so that make it a little easier to be more cautious and replace them more frequently. I think you can safely run 3000-5000 gallons through a good carbon block. ( if anyone has a better figure on that please correct me) But you still have to be sure your sediment filter is performing at an optimal level as well, or you will clog the pores in the carbon block, making it way less effective. Chlorine is bad news for TFC membranes
 

Maacc

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
1,598
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Isn't one of the best ways to check using a chloramine / chlorine test strip on the waste water line and then replace at the first sign of bleed through?
 
OP
OP
Battlecorals

Battlecorals

Aquazic Culzure
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
17,305
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Isn't one of the best ways to check using a chloramine / chlorine test strip on the waste water line and then replace at the first sign of bleed through?

Another good question. Thanks for posting. I don't really like the idea if seeing any chlorine get past my carbon blocks at all. So if you were reading any chlorine in the reject water then that would be the case.

And for steve, I'd usually change membranes when production was visibly slowed, regardless of weather the tds coming out was climbing but it usually does as production slows. At least in my case. And that would be at around the 1.5 year marker so. Again 75-100 gpd Tfcs are moderately inexpensive, and replacing them every year or two is not a big blow when you consider the scope of the regular types of expenses involved. Of course i have been making a lot of water a month for a long time now so I'm outside the norm for a typical home aquarium setup. Using my own metrics then I'd say membranes will certainly last much longer where demand for pure water is considerably less, but if you see tds climb or calculate rejection rate at less the 96% then its time to replace the membrane

From the Spectrapure manual for my 75gpd unit. How to calculate rejection rate. I hope they don't mind that I post this here.

Procedure:

  1. Read the Tap Water conductivity and record the reading. ___________
  2. Read the Permeate Water conductivity and record the reading. ___________
  3. Use the two reading to apply them to the calculation below:
  4. The general rule is that you should replace your Reverse Osmosis (RO) Membrane when the % of rejection falls below 96%.
page11image21288
page11image21448
page11image21608
page11image21768

(X - Y) = Z
___________ = % REJECTION BY MEMBRANE
X
TAP WATER TDS = X
RO WATER TDS = Y

page11image25816

EXAMPLE: (500 - 20) = 480 / 500 = 0.96 (96% rejection)
 
Last edited:

RussiReef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
3,474
Location
Sherman Oaks, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
very good thred .I struggled to keep my acros cora lsalive for 3 years . After install cloramine filter to my ro/di I successfully grow acropora corals
 

tripdad

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
4,265
Location
Chicago suburbs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Other than the rejection rate and chloramine strip is there anything else you use as an indicator? Any specific signs in the tanks? I have been in your " head scratcher " group for a while now. The first tank, threw acros in and they grew, no RO water, straight from the well. Bought all the best with the new tank and it is crazy irregular on results. I believe your simple method,(pure water, good skimmer, good light) is the right path but just cant seem to emulate it with success. Anyway, thanks for sharing your methods and knowledge, I appreciate it very much.
 
OP
OP
Battlecorals

Battlecorals

Aquazic Culzure
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
7,287
Reaction score
17,305
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Other than the rejection rate and chloramine strip is there anything else you use as an indicator? Any specific signs in the tanks? I have been in your " head scratcher " group for a while now. The first tank, threw acros in and they grew, no RO water, straight from the well. Bought all the best with the new tank and it is crazy irregular on results. I believe your simple method,(pure water, good skimmer, good light) is the right path but just cant seem to emulate it with success. Anyway, thanks for sharing your methods and knowledge, I appreciate it very much.

Quick question, are you by any chance running dual serial membrane system?
 

tripdad

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
4,265
Location
Chicago suburbs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Quick question, are you by any chance running dual serial membrane system?
No, Just a simple Spectrapure system. I've added a few canisters to it as I am on a well. I run 2 pre-filters of varying micron ratings and two carbon blocks. TDS is always zero but after reading your thoughts perhaps that ain't all there is to it?
 
Back
Top