brandon429
why did you put a reef in that
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
R2R Supporter
R2R Excellence Award
the risk isn’t injury from ammonia, we’ve covered that with link proof
the risk is disease vectoring regardless of how someone cycles.
I directly linked here proof that fish-in cycles arent harming fish, this guy will lose his clowns to brooklynella though by March if he keeps adding unprepped fish into a tank fully ready to carry fish.
@Erin1971Texas I supposed you feel that fish was burned too is that correct, even though we have a passing ammonia test? No matter what, it was burned?
we can’t read that post, and then continue saying the fish was harmed. Look at the ammonia test included
old cycling science refuses any change at all, refuses to study any web patterns always on file, and digs in heels permanently. That’s why it’s termed old cycling science
one way to spot old cycling science is they will never use forum link examples of burnt fish, they just type that fish acting totally fine are burned, digging in heels. Symptomless burning of fish is the part and parcel of old cycling science. Speed cycling cannot exist to old cycling science advocates, even if Dr. Reef posts a pageslong searchable experiment using six donated seneye machines to prove it works. They ignore the updated findings, and continue to state the opposite.
even if I took time to link Dr. Reefs bottle bac study, it wouldn’t be factored by old cycling science peers, all fish will be marked as burned ~
the risk is disease vectoring regardless of how someone cycles.
I directly linked here proof that fish-in cycles arent harming fish, this guy will lose his clowns to brooklynella though by March if he keeps adding unprepped fish into a tank fully ready to carry fish.
How to cycle my biocube
So I’ve had my biocube 32g set up for about a week now and I put live rock and live sand in there and used imagitarium water from the pet store what should I add to the water to build up the proper bacteria to add fish and when should I do my first water change and about what percentage should I...
www.reef2reef.com
@Erin1971Texas I supposed you feel that fish was burned too is that correct, even though we have a passing ammonia test? No matter what, it was burned?
we can’t read that post, and then continue saying the fish was harmed. Look at the ammonia test included
old cycling science refuses any change at all, refuses to study any web patterns always on file, and digs in heels permanently. That’s why it’s termed old cycling science
one way to spot old cycling science is they will never use forum link examples of burnt fish, they just type that fish acting totally fine are burned, digging in heels. Symptomless burning of fish is the part and parcel of old cycling science. Speed cycling cannot exist to old cycling science advocates, even if Dr. Reef posts a pageslong searchable experiment using six donated seneye machines to prove it works. They ignore the updated findings, and continue to state the opposite.
even if I took time to link Dr. Reefs bottle bac study, it wouldn’t be factored by old cycling science peers, all fish will be marked as burned ~
Last edited: