What do coral owners run your alkalinity at?

What do other mixed reef coral owners run your alk at?

  • 7-8

    Votes: 22 23.2%
  • 8-9

    Votes: 51 53.7%
  • 9-10

    Votes: 16 16.8%
  • 10-11

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • 11-12

    Votes: 2 2.1%

  • Total voters
    95

Reef Puncher

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2024
Messages
474
Reaction score
225
Location
Raleigh, NC, United States, north carolina
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So between the high alk of the red sea dark bucket, and between my kalk, im always sitting around 10.3 alk. I think thats ok, but my ICP tests says its too high and should be around 8. I know 7-8 is close to real sea water, but it is running at 10.3 bad? What does everyone else run at?
 

Arkardios

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2023
Messages
73
Reaction score
117
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since dosing AFR to keep Ca + Mg up my alk is consistently at 9. I haven't noticed any ill effect on my softies. So long as it's stable it shouldn't be a problem imo.
 

Northern Flicker

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2023
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
2,920
Location
In the simulation
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
10.3 is ok, probably a little higher than most. If you do drop it, just do it very slowly.

I wouldn't chase NSW - we did that 15 years ago and the reality is our tanks will never be like NSW. Stability will go a longer way.
 

robinm

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 21, 2021
Messages
101
Reaction score
69
Location
Louth
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I try and keep around 9 but am more interested in keeping PH stable. As long as it's within 9-10 and doesn't swing wildly then I'm happy
 
OP
OP
Reef Puncher

Reef Puncher

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2024
Messages
474
Reaction score
225
Location
Raleigh, NC, United States, north carolina
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
10.3 is ok, probably a little higher than most. If you do drop it, just do it very slowly.

I wouldn't chase NSW - we did that 15 years ago and the reality is our tanks will never be like NSW. Stability will go a longer way.

about 2 min ago someone linked me to a fascinating article:
article here

and they showed that BRS did an elevated alk/calc/mag tank vs natural seawater, and the elevated levels also grew coral faster too.

It seems as 10 alk is actually ideal....wierd. why does my ICP and alot of other reefers say 10 is too high when seems like the evidence that 10 is ideal is greater. i really find that fascinating, id love to see more tests.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
9,679
Reaction score
16,824
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So between the high alk of the red sea dark bucket, and between my kalk, im always sitting around 10.3 alk. I think thats ok, but my ICP tests says its too high and should be around 8. I know 7-8 is close to real sea water, but it is running at 10.3 bad? What does everyone else run at?
Average ocean alk is 6.5. I have ran my systems at 7 dkh for years.
I agree that stability is more important than the number.
20220106_131923.jpg
 

JamesZ.

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 20, 2021
Messages
61
Reaction score
18
Location
93013
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
8.7 - 9.2 for my Red Sea Reefer 170. I dose approx. 5-8 mL. Alk daily.
 

encrustingacro

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
2,525
Reaction score
2,264
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The salt I use is the Tropic Marin Pro--which has an alkalinity level of ~7.8 dKH--but I used to add in a bit of sodium bicarbonate to raise the alk to ~10 dKH. A downside to this he carbonate would sometimes precipitate on my mixing pumps and buckets. To stop this, I would first add in some magnesium. Nowadays, though, I just run my tank at the original salt level.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
9,679
Reaction score
16,824
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My system runs at 10dkh, it’s just where it seems to fall last 3 years or so. Heavy SPS load.

Used to run at 12dkh for a year, then 8dkh for another year, could tell no difference whatsoever.
IMG_0088.jpeg
Nice! Stability at whatever level you run wins.
 

JustAnotherNanoTank

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Messages
819
Reaction score
1,277
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Tank is staying steady at 7.7-7.8. I also use Tropic Marin Pro and just maintain the original level. When I do a water change I test the new water to match salinity and check the alk and that’s been working great for years.

This is anecdotal, but when I used to keep an elevated level, it seemed like it was more unstable and wanted to drop quickly to the original level. Whereas just maintaining the original levels didn’t seem to cause notable swings.

Coloration seems better when I’m not chasing growing numbers.

I have a nano tank with branching sps so I should take my time anyways.
 

hers0109

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 17, 2023
Messages
58
Reaction score
21
Location
El Dorado Hills
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
7.5-8.5 though I’m trying to nudge it up slightly to be above 8 just as a buffer in case something happens to dosing.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is anecdotal, but when I used to keep an elevated level, it seemed like it was more unstable and wanted to drop quickly to the original level. Whereas just maintaining the original levels didn’t seem to cause notable swings.

Unstable perhaps implies not adding it to offset demand, but it is certainly true that higher alk causes higher alk and calcium demand. Same for higher pH.
 

mattdg

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
885
Reaction score
1,412
Location
New Hamburg NY
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I've had the best luck running it on the lower end. 7-8 I find I have very few issues if the Alk drops slowly down to the 6 even 5 range. I can then slowly raise it back up by increasing daily dose and I'm back on track. On the other hand, I have had major issues with spikes and slow rises over 10/11. Completely different story for me when alk increases. RTN / STN and bleaching. When it falls I see slower growth, otherwise I wouldn't even notice if not testing weekly.

One observation is that when Alk falls, it typically does so slowly, since it directly correlates with the uptake by coral in my system. Sort of a natural process that the coral can adapt to easily. When it rises, it tends to do so rapidly due to an imbalance in the system that causes the coral to suddenly reduce uptake, increasing PH or a doser malfunction. Since the gradual fall is more easily adapted to than the rapid rise, the coral tend to experience high and low alk numbers differently. Might have to do more with this phenomenon, than the actual numbers themselves.
 
Last edited:

JustAnotherNanoTank

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Messages
819
Reaction score
1,277
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unstable perhaps implies not adding it to offset demand, but it is certainly true that higher alk causes higher alk and calcium demand. Same for higher pH.
Thank you for that. It makes a lot of sense. They are use to having it there in abundance. It seems stability overall is still the answer for alk.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top