Can’t decide between these two skimmers…both will fit, is the 9004 much better than the 9001? The only thing that is putting me off the 9004 is the surface skimming it does, as the skimmer will be in an aio with slightly fluctuating water lvls., this might be an issue for the 9004?
Tunze 9001 vs 9004
- Thread starter Reef.
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Idoc
Getting lazier and lazier with upkeep!
I use a larger in sump Tunze and really like it. I'm not sure about these smaller skimmers.
If someone with experience using these two don't respond, you may want to contact the company to see if the surface skimming with be effected by the fluctuating water levels. I would tend to think it would be an issue with the function of the equipment. Tunze and other skimmers are usually really touchy on performance and water depth.
If someone with experience using these two don't respond, you may want to contact the company to see if the surface skimming with be effected by the fluctuating water levels. I would tend to think it would be an issue with the function of the equipment. Tunze and other skimmers are usually really touchy on performance and water depth.
OP
OP
Reef.
2500 Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 4,843
- Reaction score
- 3,621
Yeah that seems to be what has come up in a few threads…ended up going for a bubble magus mini, a 3rd of the cost and gets very good reviews, if it’s no good, it’s cheap enough to try something else.
Thanks.
EasternShoreman
Community Member
I struggled with the 9001 - could never really dial in the water level/skimmate. I also switched up for a Bubble Magnus MiniQ (https://www.bulkreefsupply.com/mini...=14662&indexName=brs_prod_m2_default_products). It has been fantastic. Great build quality and works well from day 1. Really starts working well after about 48-72 hours break in. I think you will be pleased.
I've used both. Skip the 9004 if your water level isn't consistent.
Another option that size is the Aquamax NF-1. It's a pretty good skimmer, the best of the tiny ones IMO and I've had them all. Any skimmer that size tends to be something you have to tweak a little more often in my experience. Same as everything else with a Nano reef.
Another option that size is the Aquamax NF-1. It's a pretty good skimmer, the best of the tiny ones IMO and I've had them all. Any skimmer that size tends to be something you have to tweak a little more often in my experience. Same as everything else with a Nano reef.
OP
OP
Reef.
2500 Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 4,843
- Reaction score
- 3,621
Will definitely give that one a try if the Bubble Magus doesn’t work for me…wasn’t really loving the idea of the tunze, very mixed reviews for not a cheap skimmer, especially if going for the DC model, the Magus has a DC pump as standard all for £45 or £240 for the 9004!
The Tunze has mixed reviews because the vast majority of people don't understand that it's not going to produce a dry, high volume skimmate and conclude that it's not working correctly. Then they conclude that it's not adjustable, but it's not meant to be as adjustable as many designs.
If left to function as it does it will keep your tank clean while needing much less attention. Which it will do for years, hence the cost because it's built very well. Long after you've replaced the DC pump on the Bubble Magus the Tunze will be running the original. Long after the BM has cracked while you're cleaning it the Tunze will still be running without issue. You can also inject ozone into the Tunze which will make the BM brittle and cause it to break even sooner.
There are many approaches to skimmer design and many levels of quality. You do get what you pay for and if the BM fits your budget then it's the right thing to buy. It'll be fine for a couple of years.
DC motors are a new trend in the hobby. They're quiet and the ability to adjust them is very useful. However the Chinese can make anything to a price point and the life of that pump remains to be seen. £45 is the entry cost for the BM. It may not be the total cost.
Sitting at my feet is a skimmer that a few years ago was the king of the hobby. I ran it for about 3 months and it's like new in the box. I paid close to a thousand dollars for it. But while the design looked really cool and it produced a huge volume of air it really didn't skim that well. The company failed and it's worth 20 cents on the dollar of what I paid for it.
What is your thoughts on the Tunze 9004 for a AIO? I was set on purchasing the 9004, but didn’t think about the fluctuation in water level? Also I’m wondering if a person is running an ATO, much fluctuation would there be?
OP
OP
Reef.
2500 Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 4,843
- Reaction score
- 3,621
I hated the tunze 9001, maybe the tunze 9004 is better, I love the bubble magus Q, a little small for your tank maybe but worth considering and yes with a stable water lvl you should be fine with either.
I think it's great for an AIO if it's appropriately sized for the tank.
I have a WB20 AIO and the water level is consistent because I'm using an ATO.
Thank you. That’s was I was thinking.
Yes! Thank you.
Thank you!
OP
OP
Reef.
2500 Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 4,843
- Reaction score
- 3,621
Ended up going for the Tunze 9001, was loud and the skim wasn’t at all dark, swapped to the Bubble Magus mini Q, love it, quiet and a lot darker skim and half the price.
And yes the water lvl on these nano skimmers really does affect the skimmer, a slight drop and the skimmer will stop working, will restart again when the ato goes off, not an issue if you have a decent ATO to keep the water water near enough constant.
Similar threads
