I have a COR20 on my 100 gallon DT, 34 gallon sump (it's trigger sapphire 34). Whenever I do any sort of dosing, I generally just say 100 gallons.
I've been having a problem with high nutrients. For example, my phosphates yesterday were 0.34ppb (Hanna ULR). I run GFO mixed with Carbon in a reactor connected to a manifold, but that doesn't seem to really do much. I also have a UV on the manifold, Clarisea roller mat, refugium, and a reef octopus e-essence 130 skimmer. I've been dosing 3ml of phosphat-e each day, and as long as I'm consistent, I can maintain it in the 0.1s.
ANYWAY, I was running my COR20 at 70%, and the manifold puts out roughly 350GPH on the UV, and very low GPH on the carbon/gfo reactor. I was thinking upping the COR % would mean more water through the clarisea, skimmer, and refugium. Is there any downside to more turnover? That's the question haha.
Thanks,
Justin
I've been having a problem with high nutrients. For example, my phosphates yesterday were 0.34ppb (Hanna ULR). I run GFO mixed with Carbon in a reactor connected to a manifold, but that doesn't seem to really do much. I also have a UV on the manifold, Clarisea roller mat, refugium, and a reef octopus e-essence 130 skimmer. I've been dosing 3ml of phosphat-e each day, and as long as I'm consistent, I can maintain it in the 0.1s.
ANYWAY, I was running my COR20 at 70%, and the manifold puts out roughly 350GPH on the UV, and very low GPH on the carbon/gfo reactor. I was thinking upping the COR % would mean more water through the clarisea, skimmer, and refugium. Is there any downside to more turnover? That's the question haha.
Thanks,
Justin