Phosphates are 1.67 - advice needed

jkobel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
253
Reaction score
121
Location
Boston, MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

Current numbers:

Sal - 1.028
ph-8.11
temp - 78.3
alk - 9.95
ca - 373
N - 4.6
P - 1.67

All testing was done with Hanna and run 3 times each, these are the averages.

working to get the salinity down tonight.

My tank is 145 gals TSV and is 4 years old. Tank is currently LPS dominant and has always done great with LPS. My goal is to have an SPS dominant tank and SPS have always struggled in my system. For 3.5 years my nitrates and phosphates were stuck at 0. I have started feeding more heavily over last 6 months and things got dirty, now my nitrates seem to be in a better place but phosphates are way too high.


What is the best course of action to lower phosphates from this level to .02 -.1 range? Is it GFO? (I have a reactor and can set that up easily) or is it some other treatment?

The fish are all tangs and a Goby so just want to know what the safest and most productive course of action would be here.

Thanks for any help
 

scotty333

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
1,642
Reaction score
605
Location
portugal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Gfo was my control method for a while before I researched lanthium chloride
You need to do a lot of reading before taking this route as it’s powerful stuff and will surely be a cheaper option at those levels
Here’s what I did after a lot of reading and worked for me

I bought agent green LC and diluted it 50% for greater control , hooked it up to a doser and dripped 1ml per hour for x amount of hours needed to find a steady amount of reduction .

I plumbed the airline from the doser into the skimmers body with a hard pipe on the airline to keep it down in the body , I use filter wool in the baffle tightly packed to catch any crystals that the skimmer didn’t catch ( never saw any in the wool) , some use 5 micron socks but they’ll clog quickly and I don’t feel it’s necessary because it won’t get passed your skimmer
I have a caluerpa forest in the next chamber for added protection of any escape and by the time water reaches your return it should be free of any deposits
You will read reports that it’ll kill your tangs but imo it may if the lc gets in your display so use whatever you can to reduce that risk
Go slow until you start to see a reduction of say .05-.1 per day and in a few weeks you’ll find the maintenance dose needed
 

splunty

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 29, 2023
Messages
157
Reaction score
128
Location
Timnath, Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure it's meaningful to your situation, but high silica levels can interfere with po4 tests. I'm almost positive this happened to me a few weeks into a new tank with marco rock. I ran a tiny amount of GFO and my readings for po4 over the course of a week went ~ 1.0, 1.5, 1.5, 1.5, 1.0, .03 ... plummeted overnight.
 

Patx

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
653
Reaction score
470
Location
Montréal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For 3.5 years my nitrates and phosphates were stuck at 0. I have started feeding more heavily over last 6 months and things got dirty, now my nitrates seem to be in a better place but phosphates are way too high.


if possible, you Could stop feeding "reefroid" or any food that contain high level of Po4.
And see if the level drop.
 
OP
OP
jkobel

jkobel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
253
Reaction score
121
Location
Boston, MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i dont feed roids currently, just frozen mysis and brine and occasionally squid.

going to address the salinity via water change tonight

i'll start the GFO after the water change, might hold off on the LC for now as it seems to bring with it some serious risks if not used correctly and the research im doing is lots of red flags due to Tangs.

Thanks all, i'll report back if things dont improve.
 

VintageReefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
16,462
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I like this better than gfo. I really struggled with gfo in a phosban 150 reactor. I used brs high capacity. It always clumped up. Day 1 I’d have the little surface ripples and by day 2 or 3 it was clumping

This stuff doesn’t clump and I find it’s easier to use. Rowa is probably more effective and faster. I’ve never used it.

Just throwing out an alternative that worked for me and was easy

B4C5BBE7-66A2-4B50-B139-10F0021C8673.png
 

Red_Beard

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
1,799
Location
Utah
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like this better than gfo. I really struggled with gfo in a phosban 150 reactor. I used brs high capacity. It always clumped up. Day 1 I’d have the little surface ripples and by day 2 or 3 it was clumping

This stuff doesn’t clump and I find it’s easier to use. Rowa is probably more effective and faster. I’ve never used it.

Just throwing out an alternative that worked for me and was easy

B4C5BBE7-66A2-4B50-B139-10F0021C8673.png
That is what I was used to using and have used for years. I have been feeding pretty heavy for a while and got lazy changing it out. Short of the long, after a bunch of po4 got bound up in the rocks due to running about .5 for months, the phosguard wasn’t cutting it. I chucked in the recommended amount of rowa in a bag in the sump and it was almost a little too aggressive. It dropped down to .02 within 2 weeks. Surprised my LPS didn't get crabby...
 

VintageReefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
16,462
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
That is what I was used to using and have used for years. I have been feeding pretty heavy for a while and got lazy changing it out. Short of the long, after a bunch of po4 got bound up in the rocks due to running about .5 for months, the phosguard wasn’t cutting it. I chucked in the recommended amount of rowa in a bag in the sump and it was almost a little too aggressive. It dropped down to .02 within 2 weeks. Surprised my LPS didn't get crabby...
If it’s bad then the Phosguard will absorb quick but needs to be changed out every 4 days

On Sept 14 I dropped from .44 to .2 in 16 hours by replacing Phosguard with new Phosguard, and replacing my chemi pure elite bag (which contains some gfo)
 
OP
OP
jkobel

jkobel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
253
Reaction score
121
Location
Boston, MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like this better than gfo. I really struggled with gfo in a phosban 150 reactor. I used brs high capacity. It always clumped up. Day 1 I’d have the little surface ripples and by day 2 or 3 it was clumping

This stuff doesn’t clump and I find it’s easier to use. Rowa is probably more effective and faster. I’ve never used it.

Just throwing out an alternative that worked for me and was easy

B4C5BBE7-66A2-4B50-B139-10F0021C8673.png
can this be used in a standard BRS media reactor like this? https://www.bulkreefsupply.com/brs-...D=1655&indexName=brs_prod_m2_default_products
 

VintageReefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
16,462
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
OP
OP
jkobel

jkobel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
253
Reaction score
121
Location
Boston, MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes
Unlike gfo, it doesn’t clump and doesn’t need to tumble. Just needs water to flow through it


B4E9AB61-C917-41BB-A7CD-423AD056661B.jpeg


I changed this out on the 14th at 5:15 am. My phosphate measured .44

I also changed two bags of chemipure

I tested again 9:15 pm - I got a .2

I did use a few tsp more than the recommended amount

Thanks, is there a limit to how fast you want to drop it? Like not more than .5 in 24 hours or something?
 

VintageReefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
16,462
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
In general yes. But the risk is bottoming out. I have been experimenting with the effectiveness of Phosguard on my system for a month, and know what 10 scoops does. I did 14 tsp knowing it would have a stronger effect without bottoming out to zero
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top