But what power supply will future orders or recently purchased units come with this could end up being a huge issueI believe a replacement power supply with the brass version was offered here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But what power supply will future orders or recently purchased units come with this could end up being a huge issueI believe a replacement power supply with the brass version was offered here.
I've been recommending them as a budget alternative to anyone looking for lights. I will no longer be recommending them after reading this thread. Even if the supply puts put 140 watts it's labeled as a 126 watt supply and Noopsyche has failed to even explain why it is labeled as such unless I missed it. I gives me serous doubt as to the validity of the safely labeling on the supply. But I guess those of us looking for budget Chinese lighting should expect some disappontments. Too bad but it reminds me of the statement. Ya get what Ya pay for.i have always backed and supported @noopsyche this has become a serious problem. It is hard to support and push a product that cant give straight answers about why things have changed. In the beginning this product was amazing and had lots of information and help. This will be the turning point on where things go from here.
don’t see any “empty threats” in this thread.
Fair enough, but you basing this on speculation. No one has reported these power supplies to be faulty. And as of right now, the best conclusion is that they've mislabeled the power supply. It's your prerogative to interpret it any way you want.the answers given raised enough red flags for me that i’m no longer willing to gamble on purchasing them and will stick with brands I do trust.
Oh geez, where to even start.Fair enough, but you basing this on speculation. No one has reported these power supplies to be faulty. And as of right now, the best conclusion is that they've mislabeled the power supply. It's your prerogative to interpret it any way you want.
To say that this is the straw that broke the camel's back is perfectly fine, but to most readers the intent is an attempt to put noopshyche in the hot seat and say if they don't provide better answers, we're no longer going to recommend or purchase your product. To which I say, is a bit over the top and unnecessary. In fact, it will have the opposite effect. They won't want to answer or clarify any more information because of how it will be dissected and used against them.
The best approach here is to have a civilized conversation without ultimatums and view this as a discussion to get to the bottom of it.
When people object to the answers given in such a way, it derails the conversation that many in this thread are trying to have with the manufacturer. You and I are outside observers with no skin in the game. But people with these power supplies need to have a better assurances that they can use them without the risk of danger. All I'm saying is that threatening them only make
I would urge you to take a step back and not view my comments as a defense to the manufacturer but consider that if you want them to continue in a discussion, throwing accusations that may or may not be true isn't going to bear fruit.Oh geez, where to even start.
Labeling an electrical supply with incorrect wattage amounts can't possibly be legal or up to code. This is a potential fire hazard.
Let that sink in. Potential. Fire. Hazard.
I don't think anyone is being unreasonable here other than your defense of noopsyche.
I would like to thank OP for bringing this up. Now I know to stay away from these lights and company.
I urge everyone to never use a device that does not match the specs on the label.I would urge you to take a step back and not view my comments as a defense to the manufacturer but consider that if you want them to continue in a discussion, throwing accusations that may or may not be true isn't going to bear fruit.
I'm not down playing the idea that if in fact these are labeled correctly, they pose an issue. But, fire hazard is a very big leap especially if we go off the notion that they are labeled correctly and these power supplies meet the list of stringent standards listed on the power supply. Chances are they will fault before that happened. Even in the event it does get to the point that it overheats, the materials used (based on the label) will not combust.
As I definitely used your post as an example there are plenty more that could've been quoted. I didn't mean to single you out, as much as yours was the latest post.Sisterlimonpot, most of your response pertaining to me is also speculation.
This is a statement that leads to speculation. It's very ambiguous. Are you just stating facts? Or is there a purpose?126w is the actual maximum output power of DC output. The international standard is plus or minus 5% fault tolerance. The maximum power tested by K7 PRO III is 140watt (this includes the power loss of the power supply, and the power supply efficiency is 88%)
If 126w is the actual maximum power output, then I would like you to send me the older bronze power supply that is rated to meet or exceed the 140 watt requirement for the light. My home insurance agent would not be happy with me for running the lower wattage power supply.126w is the actual maximum output power of DC output. The international standard is plus or minus 5% fault tolerance. The maximum power tested by K7 PRO III is 140watt (this includes the power loss of the power supply, and the power supply efficiency is 88%)