- Joined
- Dec 12, 2017
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 145
So this reactor is designed to run pressure inside the chamber ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The supplied feed pump is only capable of about 2psi, so that is the highest internal pressure the reactor will see.So this reactor is designed to run pressure inside the chamber ?
Thank you! It is fun to watch, too. Despite the white noise in the video (my sump and mad scientist laboratory is a bit chaotic) it's actually pretty quiet too. You can't really hear the rain.This thing looks great!
Any idea on pricing yet? Thoughts on running it on small systems?Thank you! It is fun to watch, too. Despite the white noise in the video (my sump and mad scientist laboratory is a bit chaotic) it's actually pretty quiet too. You can't really hear the rain.
Roughly the same as the Ozone reactor.Any idea on pricing yet? Thoughts on running it on small systems?
Not a sure thing, but we're aiming for holiday season. Which is pretty soon!Two questions:
1) any updates on release date?
2) will there be a "YOU Built" option?
We use a simple little drip emitter that will need blown out typically once a quarter (or more often, depending on how hard the reactor is run). No need for an expensive peri pump. We will supply a tiny DC feed pump that works well with the drip emitter. Definitely no needle valves as they are prone to clogging much quicker.Sorry if I have missed the info but how are you maintaining a constant effluent rate and ensure that the output line doesn't get clogged up overtime in 6-12 months ?
Does it use a continuous duty peristaltic pump and get rid of needle valves ?
It's basically the same efficiency as any good standard reactor, in that it doesn't waste any CO2 through the effluent. It's certainly more space efficient, since more media can be dissolved in the smaller CO2-full chamber than a larger, water filled reactor.Really interesting reactor design! I cant imagine this being very efficient on its CO² consumption?
Never seen a design like that!
Not a sure thing, but we're aiming for holiday season. Which is pretty soon!
You Built will be coming typically 6 months to a year out, once we have worked out the little production kinks, to ensure that it is easily built by hobbyists. That said, since it is based on the ozone reactor design that is fairly mature at this point, I can see the You built option coming sooner.
We use a simple little drip emitter that will need blown out typically once a quarter (or more often, depending on how hard the reactor is run). No need for an expensive peri pump. We will supply a tiny DC feed pump that works well with the drip emitter. Definitely no needle valves as they are prone to clogging much quicker.
It's basically the same efficiency as any good standard reactor, in that it doesn't waste any CO2 through the effluent. It's certainly more space efficient, since more media can be dissolved in the smaller CO2-full chamber than a larger, water filled reactor.
Not a sure thing, but we're aiming for holiday season. Which is pretty soon!
You Built will be coming typically 6 months to a year out, once we have worked out the little production kinks, to ensure that it is easily built by hobbyists. That said, since it is based on the ozone reactor design that is fairly mature at this point, I can see the You built option coming sooner.
We use a simple little drip emitter that will need blown out typically once a quarter (or more often, depending on how hard the reactor is run). No need for an expensive peri pump. We will supply a tiny DC feed pump that works well with the drip emitter. Definitely no needle valves as they are prone to clogging much quicker.
It's basically the same efficiency as any good standard reactor, in that it doesn't waste any CO2 through the effluent. It's certainly more space efficient, since more media can be dissolved in the smaller CO2-full chamber than a larger, water filled reactor.
We've measured it in the upper 40's at about 15ml/min. Is it a superior design? I think so- it puts out a lot of calcium and alkalinity for a pretty compact size and weight. It uses a more energy efficient pump than many designs of similar capacity. And it's fairly low maintenance as calcium reactors go. The drip emitter is consistent and the feed pump is tiny (low power consumption also) and doesn't require messing with except every few months. (more below)What's the dkh and ml/min of your effluent? have you tested it ?
Edit:I just figured a conventional design will all media submerged/being pumped through would have much more surface/acidic water contact area? IDK?
It's a really cool looking design, but is it really superior to conventional reactor design?
Yes, they are cheap and easy to replace, but I just take mine off, flush it out from the opposite direction, and put it back on the line opposite from last time and it's good to go. You could probably drop them in a cup of diluted muriatic acid to wash them out to a like-new state.Thank you for the reply . So the drip emitter should be replaced once every quarter or more often for larger demands . Am guessing it will be quite cheap to replace and we can buy in advance a year or so worth of drip emitters
Probably was to stop folks from complaining about servicing it?
Probably was to stop folks from complaining about servicing it?