Nero 5 - % Settings and Actual Flow

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
First, I want to say that I love these pumps. If I were writing a review on a vendor website, it would be "5 stars" and "yes, I would recommend to a friend." These are my first controllable pumps and I find the app to be really easy to use, fun to program, and I think built-in flow meter is pretty useful (as you'll see below)!

Regarding the flow, I replied in a few other threads, chiming-in about setting read-outs, and I thought the information below might be useful to others. I searched the R2R, and while one could piece this information together from various threads, I couldn't find it all in one place... so here it goes.

The Nero 5 can be tuned from 1% to 100%, however, I have found that these settings are not a percentage of actual flow vs. 3000gph. I have two, and I wanted to set my tank to a "low energy lagoon" type setting (my tank is 65g @36" long). During the day, I have the pumps set at random, between 10% and 30%. I came to these levels because at 30%, the readout showed approximately 1560gph for one pump. When each of the two pumps hit their max point, that would be about 3100gph, or almost 48x turnover. However, doing the math in my head, when I looked at the flow readout in the app, the numbers I was seeing didn't coincide with actual percentages. For instance, 10% of 3000 should be 300gph, and 30% should be 900gph. However, the meter showed differently. So, I put a single pump on "constant speed" mode and adjusted the flow from 100% down to 1% and wrote down the readings at each interval. Below are the results:

upload_2019-2-15_9-2-7.png


As you can see, though I have it set to random with a min of 10% to 30%, the pump is actually producing flow at 38%-52% of max gph. This actually makes me feel better about my purchase because for a while it felt like I bought two pumps that were overpowered for what I was going for and I could have gone in another direction. One other positive that I found from this table is that though I have it set at 10%-30%, the variations from the low point to the max point isn't 300% (300-900); rather, the max is only 37% higher vs the min at my settings (1140 to 1560). This allows me to dial-in the peak and trough levels I want a little more accurately; I think I'm going to make the margin wider.

There are a few limitations to these data. First, these readings are entirely from the AI app, so there is a possibility that the given percentage setting is right, but the flow read-out is wrong. Second, the reverse could be true where the flow is right but the percentage read-out is wrong (i.e., 1% power is not 1% power). Third, it could be a combination of the above two issues. Fourth, this is a single case (though both of my pumps show nearly identical numbers). Others may have different readings that are closer to the actual percentages and mine could be an outlier. I'm sure there are other limitations, this I just what I though of off the top of my head.

I don't view the differences as a knock on the product. Most, if not all other products don't have the built-in meter, so it would be hard to compare the settings of other pumps. At least the AI app allows for this type of data to be collected! I just want to say once again, I really like these pumps and would 100% buy again.

In any case, I hope others find this useful.
-Homebrewer
 

doughboy

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
563
Reaction score
307
Location
Norcal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
DC motors require a minimum amount of current for it to spin (and overcome water resistance).
You can test with pump out of water and see what results you get. Yes it is perfectly fine to run the pump out of water. Good DC pumps will shutdown if it detects there is not enough resistance (running dry), after running a minute or so.
How did you measure GPH? I think you said you just go by what the AI app says right?
I tested BLDC motor pump by measuring the signal pulse vs % setting. measuring rpm actually instead of gph, which should be directly linearly proportional.

but yes, DC pump speed setting really starts at 30% of actual max speed. So if controller has 10 speed settings, they are in increments of 7% from 30%. Or in case of nero, increments of approximately 0.7% from 30%.

FWIW, AI apps give reading close enough to actual values.
I tested the "power" consumption reading for AI Hydra HD and compared against kill-a-watt reading and it is quite close.
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@doughboy, thanks for this additional information; very useful!

I did go by the AI app, but I accounted for the possibility of error where I listed my limitations of the data.
Also, I take your point about testing out of water, it's a good thought, but the pumps have no effect on the current in the tank when they are out of water, and my point was to show the percentages as it relates to the flow in the tank.

I wrote this, in part, because I chimed-in on some other threads where folks asked about these pumps, and some responses indicated that they were fully controllable down to 1%, but that 1% "power" does not equate to 1% of the possible max flow, and that wasn't being made clear. I appreciate your data as it seems to support the "why" from a electronic perspective. I suppose the bottom line is, at the low-end of power consumption, one cannot dial this pump down below approximately 30% of max flow, even though the control of the pump allows the user to set the power at 1%.

That is at the extreme low-end; at the extreme high-end, the pump at 100% power performs as might be expected, at or above 100% flow. Interesting though when one looks at some of the middle numbers, they don't coincide with the power settings. So for instance, at 50% "power" the pump is pushing almost 66% of it's max flow. In any case, it is more useful to me to know what percentage of flow I'm at, not what percentage of power is being used; how many gph I'm pushing rather than what the power setting is on the pump. As I typed in my OP, these differences can be amplified at some of the lower settings where the gap between the theoretical and actual values are greatest.

Perhaps a firmware update giving the user the option to select "power %" or "flow %" would be useful to those who desire such a setting. In the meantime, I find the table I created useful for my purposes and I thought I would share with others. Regardless, I still love these things!

Thanks again for adding your info to this thread!
 

doughboy

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
563
Reaction score
307
Location
Norcal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
yes, a direct read out would be helpful.
as it is now, you have to "map" the 1-100% scale to the 30-100% scale.

so say at 50% setting, that is actually (50 x 0.7) + 30 = 65% of max flow.
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bingo! Your "map" comment is exactly my point. Your equation is super-helpful for anyone wanting to figure out the flow rate at any given setting. The table I provided is a quick reference for the 10% steps.
 

blstravler

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 5, 2019
Messages
4,134
Reaction score
1,409
Location
Coastal New Jersey
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Bingo! Your "map" comment is exactly my point. Your equation is super-helpful for anyone wanting to figure out the flow rate at any given setting. The table I provided is a quick reference for the 10% steps.

Just wanted to say thank you for posting this! I’ve been banging my head against the wall trying to figure this out - very helpful!
 

SDK

Reef Diver
View Badges
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
1,495
Reaction score
3,166
Location
Shrewsbury
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for posting. I tune pumps more visually, but very useful...

I am also a big fan of the Nero 5. As long as you make sure your glass is not too thick and factor in the $20 for a guard, they are one of the best pumps out there for the money. I'm assuming that a V2 will come out that addresses both issues....
 

AquaHobby31

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
200
Reaction score
209
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can share your settings? I’d like to see how people are setting up their flow...wave vs random vs constant. Attached is mine

A1E19CA5-5D6C-48BB-99E2-7C946861B4A6.png F34030BC-D4AE-48E6-809B-A6A09A78C188.png
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sure. I have a 36”,65g, and two Nero 5s. Each are positioned about mid-way down, one back right and the other front left. I’ll post back right here, and I’ll zoom in on the pulse settings. These pulse settings achieve the effect without allowing the pump to completely spin down to the point where the fan is off.

C73A3C4D-3FA1-4B98-A885-4B21C3D8555F.png E6F48B91-C38D-4BA4-A86F-2D87D69051B6.png
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Front left

Both sets of setting are a bit more aggressive from when I originally posted.

1869D6B5-1A0B-4A38-B1AC-2E74BE713E83.png BC8763BD-E69C-4DA2-BF5C-B350BB6BADCE.png
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 57, basically same dimensions, just a tad shorter. Do you think 2x Nero 3 would be enough or would I need the 5?
I think the 3’s would be fine, you’d just have to run them at a higher percentage (across the modes) to achieve similar flow as compared to the settings I posted above. I don’t have the 3’s so I can’t say exactly what the percentages might have to be, but once installed you could use the flow read-outs to create a similar table, and adjust your settings based on that.
 

Jesse571

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 26, 2021
Messages
107
Reaction score
41
Location
Vancouver Island British Columbia Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
First, I want to say that I love these pumps. If I were writing a review on a vendor website, it would be "5 stars" and "yes, I would recommend to a friend." These are my first controllable pumps and I find the app to be really easy to use, fun to program, and I think built-in flow meter is pretty useful (as you'll see below)!

Regarding the flow, I replied in a few other threads, chiming-in about setting read-outs, and I thought the information below might be useful to others. I searched the R2R, and while one could piece this information together from various threads, I couldn't find it all in one place... so here it goes.

The Nero 5 can be tuned from 1% to 100%, however, I have found that these settings are not a percentage of actual flow vs. 3000gph. I have two, and I wanted to set my tank to a "low energy lagoon" type setting (my tank is 65g @36" long). During the day, I have the pumps set at random, between 10% and 30%. I came to these levels because at 30%, the readout showed approximately 1560gph for one pump. When each of the two pumps hit their max point, that would be about 3100gph, or almost 48x turnover. However, doing the math in my head, when I looked at the flow readout in the app, the numbers I was seeing didn't coincide with actual percentages. For instance, 10% of 3000 should be 300gph, and 30% should be 900gph. However, the meter showed differently. So, I put a single pump on "constant speed" mode and adjusted the flow from 100% down to 1% and wrote down the readings at each interval. Below are the results:

upload_2019-2-15_9-2-7.png


As you can see, though I have it set to random with a min of 10% to 30%, the pump is actually producing flow at 38%-52% of max gph. This actually makes me feel better about my purchase because for a while it felt like I bought two pumps that were overpowered for what I was going for and I could have gone in another direction. One other positive that I found from this table is that though I have it set at 10%-30%, the variations from the low point to the max point isn't 300% (300-900); rather, the max is only 37% higher vs the min at my settings (1140 to 1560). This allows me to dial-in the peak and trough levels I want a little more accurately; I think I'm going to make the margin wider.

There are a few limitations to these data. First, these readings are entirely from the AI app, so there is a possibility that the given percentage setting is right, but the flow read-out is wrong. Second, the reverse could be true where the flow is right but the percentage read-out is wrong (i.e., 1% power is not 1% power). Third, it could be a combination of the above two issues. Fourth, this is a single case (though both of my pumps show nearly identical numbers). Others may have different readings that are closer to the actual percentages and mine could be an outlier. I'm sure there are other limitations, this I just what I though of off the top of my head.

I don't view the differences as a knock on the product. Most, if not all other products don't have the built-in meter, so it would be hard to compare the settings of other pumps. At least the AI app allows for this type of data to be collected! I just want to say once again, I really like these pumps and would 100% buy again.

In any case, I hope others find this useful.
-Homebrewer
I'm just about to pull the trigger on Nero but am unsure if I should get the 3 or the 5? I have a loaded lps 50 gallon 4' tank and want to be sure that I don't overpower it. Thanks for your time with this.
 

Fish_Fry

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
131
Reaction score
168
Location
Denver
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMO for a 4ft tank go with the 5.

I have a 75 gallon 3ft tank and I'm happy with my Nero 5. Once I have more and larger corals I'll probably add a Nero 3 or another power head to the other side.
 

ekandler

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
454
Reaction score
329
Location
California MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm just about to pull the trigger on Nero but am unsure if I should get the 3 or the 5? I have a loaded lps 50 gallon 4' tank and want to be sure that I don't overpower it. Thanks for your time with this.
I have a 4ft tank with two Nero 5s and it works well. Run both pumps on pulse at 60% intensity.
 

ekandler

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
454
Reaction score
329
Location
California MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I noticed in people’s settings that you’re running less flow at night. What’s the thought behind that? I’ve heard mixed reviews on that, from you should run less flow to let cleanup crew get around easier to you shouldn’t change the flow day-to-night because the ocean doesn’t.
 
OP
OP
Homebrewer

Homebrewer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
446
Reaction score
813
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I noticed in people’s settings that you’re running less flow at night. What’s the thought behind that? I’ve heard mixed reviews on that, from you should run less flow to let cleanup crew get around easier to you shouldn’t change the flow day-to-night because the ocean doesn’t.
You’re completely right that that ocean doesn’t change day to night, however, the ocean is a big place and so are reefs. At night, the fish aren’t swimming around as they are during the day, rather, they are finding “breaks” in the current, often by hiding in spots within rocks and coral.

Here is my rationale… Aquariums are closed systems with finite space. There may be limited spots where these “breaks” are available and fish, just like any animal, needs their rest. By decreasing the flow to a steady, low flow rate at night, the fish have to spend less energy during the time when they are resting/sleeping.

Maybe in a much larger tank with hundreds of pounds of rock it wouldn’t make a difference, but this has worked in my 65G for many years now, and I have some very long-lived fish, so I’m inclined to keep it this way. Not suggesting that I am absolutely right, only that this approach has worked for me.
 
Back
Top