Hello.
I’m setting up a large (approx. 1000L display, approx. 250L sump) system and am looking to design the sump in a basement fish room. I have a question on water changes. I want the lowest tech possible – less failure points, less to worry about, lower cost etc etc.
I was thinking of setting the sump up such that I would have about 2 or 3 sections to the sump.
The first section would be with filters/skimmers and ending in a ‘fuge that would connect via a bulkhead with valved piping to the final section which would contain bubble trap, ATO and return pump. In parallel to this, I would have a fresh saltwater make-up tank plumbed from ‘fuge, (with valve) to return pump tank (with valve).
In normal operation, the direct line from ‘fuge to return pump tank valve would be open. The valves to the saltwater make-up would be closed.
In water change, I would close the direct line (‘fuge to return pump tank) and open the valve from ‘fuge to fresh saltwater, and from fresh saltwater to return pump tank.
Effectively, I would dump 150L of fresh saltwater into the system as extra volume
After one night, I would reverse the procedure, isolating the saltwater tank, draining it and prepping for next change. Plan for approx. 10% a week.
Will this work?
Disadvantage is that I only gain about 90% of the volume change as I am diluting in, not replacing volume. I am fine with this due to advantage.
Advantage – simply three valves to move. No pumps, no calibrating of pumps. No worries about pump failures or pump costs. About as simple as I could imagine.
All comments are welcome!
I’m setting up a large (approx. 1000L display, approx. 250L sump) system and am looking to design the sump in a basement fish room. I have a question on water changes. I want the lowest tech possible – less failure points, less to worry about, lower cost etc etc.
I was thinking of setting the sump up such that I would have about 2 or 3 sections to the sump.
The first section would be with filters/skimmers and ending in a ‘fuge that would connect via a bulkhead with valved piping to the final section which would contain bubble trap, ATO and return pump. In parallel to this, I would have a fresh saltwater make-up tank plumbed from ‘fuge, (with valve) to return pump tank (with valve).
In normal operation, the direct line from ‘fuge to return pump tank valve would be open. The valves to the saltwater make-up would be closed.
In water change, I would close the direct line (‘fuge to return pump tank) and open the valve from ‘fuge to fresh saltwater, and from fresh saltwater to return pump tank.
Effectively, I would dump 150L of fresh saltwater into the system as extra volume
After one night, I would reverse the procedure, isolating the saltwater tank, draining it and prepping for next change. Plan for approx. 10% a week.
Will this work?
Disadvantage is that I only gain about 90% of the volume change as I am diluting in, not replacing volume. I am fine with this due to advantage.
Advantage – simply three valves to move. No pumps, no calibrating of pumps. No worries about pump failures or pump costs. About as simple as I could imagine.
All comments are welcome!