If, in the future, you expect readers to look into scientific references, please post the actual literature reference in a normal scientific form, not a link to a password protected private database.
Something like this:
Sabrina Rosset, Jörg Wiedenmann, Adam J. Reed, Cecilia D'Angelo,
Phosphate deficiency promotes coral bleaching and is reflected by the ultrastructure of symbiotic dinoflagellates, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 118, Issues 1–2, 2017, Pages 180-187
I would also suggest that such papers need careful reading and that extrapolating to a reef tank requires one to read deeply.
For example, this paper has this statement, which if read with a lack of deep understanding, would seem to support your theory:
"Recently, we demonstrated that corals exposed to HN/LP conditions were more susceptible to bleaching when exposed to heat stress and/or elevated light levels (Wiedenmann et al., 2013). "
(this is a link to a free pdf of the full bleaching article referenced there:
http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Nutrient enrichment.pdf )
They go on to show several potentially undesirable effects on zoox of this level of nutrients.
BUT, when you look carefully into what they mean by low phosphate high nitrate conditions, they actually mean:
"high nitrogen/low phosphorus (HN/LP = ~ 38 μM NO3−/~0.18 μM PO4−; N: P ratio = 211:1) "
38 uM nitrate = 2.4 ppm
0.18 uM phosphate = 0.017 ppm phosphate
and what are they comparing to that represents a better case, in their experiments?
"In our experiments, a phosphate concentration of ~ 0.3 μM at a N: P ratio of 22:1 yielded an overall healthy phenotype. Accordingly, it is likely that the absolute N: P ratio becomes also less critical for the proper functioning of the symbionts when phosphate concentrations exceed a vital supply threshold (> 0.3 μM), even when the symbionts are rapidly proliferating. "
What are these levels?
0.3 uM phosphate = 0.029 ppm phosphate
38 uM nitrate = 2.4 ppm nitrate
Interesting. THAT IS well within the range I have recommended (0.03 ppm phosphate, a few ppm nitrate). QED.
We are getting somewhere.
In a range, yes, but that range will not minimize the risk for phosphorus to become the limiting factor. There are a lot of publications about corals and symbiodinium and the use of nutrients and they have different results concerning the ranges but it all comes to the same, phosphorus is best not the limiting factor.
As one has no idea of how much nitrogen and phosphorus is cycled in the aquarium, to minimize the risk for nitrogen to support increasing growth and the supply of phosphorus or other essentials can not follow ( during periods of increased growth due to temp or DOC in the holobiont) , balancing the nutrient reserve in a way this reserve may be responsible for phosphorus starvation is minimized seems to me good husbandry. And it is not only for the corrals but for all nutrient cycles taking place.
And it is easy! Keep it below 10/1. 0.2 ppm phosphate and <2ppm nitrate? 0.1ppm and <1ppm?
0.2ppm phosphate is enough to support nitrification and denitrification processes also when filters or reactors are used and temp increases 2°C . It is not enough for removing 20 ppm nitrate using a denitrator and 0 nitrate in the effluent. With 0.03 ppm phosphate reserve such a device will not be able to function properly as phosphate present in the reactor will be depleted fast, depending on the nitrate level.
Good nutrient husbandry is preventing phosphorus may become the limiting factor for growth.
Does phosphate support algae growth? of course, but only when nitrogen is suffiently available. By preference nitrate is used as the limiting factor, in most cases, this prevents depletion of other essential nutrients on a moment they are very needed.
Managing the nutrient reserve is not that difficult, starting with the protein content of the added food.
It is a good idea for everybody to use propper references and explain why if advice is given. But as you well know one can not publish protected information on a public forum without having permission. I do refer to my source, as directed for using information made available by Makazi Baharini. If from content of Makazi Baharini is used one must provide a link to where the info is made available. The provided info is for personal use only, this with respect to the publishers and authors of the used references. Also, papers made available for the public by the author are not automatically free to use and often for personal use only, the rights of the publishers still stand.
Happy reefing.