GFO a good or bad idea?

Purpletang92

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
588
Reaction score
430
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Have you guys noticed any ill effects using GFO even in small quantities in your reef tank? My lps shrink a lot whenever I use it no matter what.
 

landlubber

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
1,507
Reaction score
1,350
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
truthfully it's both.
GFO is incredibly effective at pulling phosphate from the water. If you use too much it will strip more than you might want and sets the user up for bigger issues like dinos.
Use it if needed (ideally in a reactor) but just be cautious not to use too much or run in without testing frequently to stay on top of your numbers
 

bobnicaragua

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
1,295
Location
Dallas, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have 2 bags in my sump of GFO and carbon. One bag gets changed every 2 weeks. No issues here, but running passively in a bag is a less effective/gentle way to do it.
 

Aquariumaddictuk

Discus Sensei, Reefing Padawan
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
516
Reaction score
596
Location
Cambridge
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I only managed to control po4 "gently" with GFO when I started adding a little to filter socks & changing little & often.in a reactor it was too aggressive & caused cyano.
 
OP
OP
Purpletang92

Purpletang92

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
588
Reaction score
430
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have 2 bags in my sump of GFO and carbon. One bag gets changed every 2 weeks. No issues here, but running passively in a bag is a less effective/gentle way to do it.
I’ve noticed if I use too much carbon I kind of get the same effect, have you noticed this before?
 

Pistondog

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
5,470
Reaction score
9,581
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It was .04 I just put a little in only because the glass was getting a green film, nothing died but I just noticed hammers are not as open. I have pulled it and will continue to monitor.
As you found, reducing nutrients is not an effective way to control algae.
At 0.04 ppm po4, you risk starving your corals.
 
OP
OP
Purpletang92

Purpletang92

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
588
Reaction score
430
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As you found, reducing nutrients is not an effective way to control algae.
At 0.04 ppm po4, you risk starving your corals.
Figured that’s what happened but I’ll continue to monitor and won’t change anything else.
 

exnisstech

Grumpy old man
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
10,593
Reaction score
15,225
Location
Ashland Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It was .04 I just put a little in only because the glass was getting a green film, nothing died but I just noticed hammers are not as open. I have pulled it and will continue to monitor.
I've been told film on the glass was a good thing and normal for healthy tanks and is just part of reefing :thinking-face:. I have a tank with PO4 0.2-0.35 and another with PO4 that stays around 0.02-0.04 and I have to clean the glass every few days on both. I also have sponges and other cool stuff growing on rocks in the shaded areas.
 
OP
OP
Purpletang92

Purpletang92

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
588
Reaction score
430
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been told film on the glass was a good thing and normal for healthy tanks and is just part of reefing :thinking-face:. I have a tank with PO4 0.2-0.35 and another with PO4 that stays around 0.02-0.04 and I have to clean the glass every few days on both. I also have sponges and other cool stuff growing on rocks in the shaded areas.
Do you feed phytoplankton ?
 

rtparty

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
5,388
Reaction score
9,137
Location
Utah
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
My LPS corals disagree. They were looking very unhappy in the high .1x range. Got it down to .05 +/- and they are back to looking great.

I ran around .4ppm on my PO4 for a long time. None of my LPS cared one bit. Tough to get a sense but the hammers and frogspawn all had well over 100 heads on them. They were pushing 200+. This picture was taken with NO3 around 10ppm and .2ppm PO4. PO4 started dropping from the .4 when I started dosing ammonium bicarbonate.

IMG_1510.jpeg
 

exnisstech

Grumpy old man
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
10,593
Reaction score
15,225
Location
Ashland Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What about the foods you feed ? Frozen? Pellets?

Normally frozen is PE mysis, and rods original. Pellets formula one and two pellets, sustainable aquatics pellets, and dk1 pellets. I add selcon, vitachem and reef roids mixed in with the food 2-3 times a week. I mix the pellets with the frozen. I have some large fish and do feed heavily. I don't remember ever not having to clean the glass at least twice a week on any tank if had over the last 8+ years. I'm far from a neat freak too.
 
OP
OP
Purpletang92

Purpletang92

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
588
Reaction score
430
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I ran around .4ppm on my PO4 for a long time. None of my LPS cared one bit. Tough to get a sense but the hammers and frogspawn all had well over 100 heads on them. They were pushing 200+. This picture was taken with NO3 around 10ppm and .2ppm PO4. PO4 started dropping from the .4 when I started dosing ammonium bicarbonate.

IMG_1510.jpeg
Your system seems to have very high light, correct me if I’m wrong but, you can run high nutrient with high lighting ? Lower nutrient means lower lighting? I read something somewhere about this.
 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top