ELOS NEW way of dosing "using weight" to "self-verify" exact dosing amounts of trace elements for your reef tank?

BRS

What do you think of the idea of "using weight" to verify exact dosing amounts of trace elements?

  • I Like It

    Votes: 72 42.9%
  • Don't Like It

    Votes: 29 17.3%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 64 38.1%
  • Other (please explain)

    Votes: 3 1.8%

  • Total voters
    168

ZombieEngineer

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2022
Messages
1,310
Reaction score
1,169
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Broomfield
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yeah you are right in one way but the big thing is human error ... not everybody Measure liquid the same way though

People could stop pouring at under the line, on line or above the line.. people have their own version of whatever the measurement is... weigh the product eliminate the guess-work
You are comparing manual dosing to controlled dosing here. My dosing pump that does not use weight whatsoever, delivers consistent volume of my dosing liquid. It cant read over or under the line. Over a long period of time, the tubing can wear out and lead to a slight change in output (2% change in a year is typical). A dosing pump does not have those sorts of human error and there are a plethora of options already available for that.

The only novel thing here is that the dosing containers are weighed. That does not make this more accurate whatsoever because if my dosing pump delivers 1.2ml, that will weigh 1.2g no matter what. If this device delivers 1.2ml, but measured incorrectly at 1.1g, it will end up inaccurately dosing an extra 0.1ml more than it should because the weight had an error. Even though they say this will alleviate the need for calibration (which is minimal anyway, about 2% per year on a quality pump), they just added an extra failure point that can actually make the entire system less accurate.
 

GARRIGA

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Messages
1,464
Reaction score
1,113
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
South Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Weight should be more accurate than volume which can be impacted by how it's compacted. However, latter less effort although the mention of using it for salt is worth the effort and in the long run less effort. Something I should consider next time. Doubt my cups are ever exactly the same and I use a leveling knife to get it somewhat right .
 

jabberwock

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
2,395
Reaction score
2,707
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
in front of my computer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since weight involves gravity, which is variable depending on geography, I think this product is bogus. Mass would be a better way to measure the quantities. If they don't get the basic scientific concepts, it is probably just snake oil.
 

ZombieEngineer

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2022
Messages
1,310
Reaction score
1,169
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Broomfield
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since weight involves gravity, which is variable depending on geography, I think this product is bogus. Mass would be a better way to measure the quantities. If they don't get the basic scientific concepts, it is probably just snake oil.
Weight and mass are equal on the planet ...gravity does not change by any appreciable level based on geography (0.2% difference between sea level and mt everest base camp). I don't think the intended use of this device is interplanetary or on a space station.
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
58,891
Reaction score
52,911
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seems like a total gimmick to me.
No one has (or needs to have) a super precise trace element dosing scheme because no one has(or needs to have) a super precise target for trace element concentrations.

recommendations vary a lot, by more than a factor 10, even more than 100 in some cases. Testing also has substantial uncertainty.

Is it important to dose iron from 1.00 ppb to 10.00 ppb, rather than to 9 or 11 ppb?
 

Reefer Matt

Reef Cave Dweller
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
8,457
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Michigan, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm not part of the "no water change" crowd, so dosing trace elements isn't part of my setup, and I can't comment on that part. I could see some potential benefit if this was for two part.
Also, the cost of the unit would be a factor into any gains made using the system versus equipment already available.
 

MMcKenna1029

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Messages
66
Reaction score
69
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Gilford
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't see this being practical at all over time. Bigger factors if you really wanted to be critical of trace elements would be the solution potency of each element, (do you really know it?), and then monitoring actual consumption over time through high accuracy regular testing. If trace elements is that important to you go Reef Moonshiners and be done with it.
 

Reef-junky

2500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
2,888
Reaction score
4,374
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Weight and mass are equal on the planet ...gravity does not change by any appreciable level based on geography (0.2% difference between sea level and mt everest base camp). I don't think the intended use of this device is interplanetary or on a space station.
The point is if your going to pay I’m sure the heavy price tag this thing comes with and your trying to be very accurate then I want a balance not a scale otherwise why take it to this level to begin with.
 

amoore311

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
412
Reaction score
575
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Wallkill, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like weighing salt mix instead of going by volume.

But seeing as this product is by Elos, it's going to be 3x-5x as expensive as it should be. The benefits are not even going to come close to the cost premium they are going to try and charge for this thing.
 

Dan_P

5000 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
5,279
Reaction score
5,675
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Looks like this will be at MACNA this weekend and wanted to know what you all thought about it!

What do you think of the idea of "using weight" to "self-verify" exact dosing amounts of trace elements for your reef tank?


Here's the email I just got about it.

ELOS Pesatron Automatic Weighing Station

The ELOS Pesatron works symbiotically with the ELOS Dosatron to provide reliable and consistent dosing to your aquarium. The ELOS Pesatron self-verifies exact dosing amounts using weight and adjusts the behavior of the dosing pumps, without the need for manual calibration. With the ELOS Pesatron built in weight scales, you no longer need to manually calibrate dosing pumps, preventing dosing errors that may occur by drifts over time. In addition, the ELOS Pesatron is accurate to the tenth of a gram.

View attachment 2820120

ELOS Dosatron Intelligent Dosing Station

It’s not just a simple dosing pump - it’s the "brain" of your aquarium. The Elos Dosatron will calculate dosing level needs of your aquarium based on the data you enter (KH-Ca-Mg Test) and will administer the main supplements accordingly. The ELOS Dosatron learns your aquarium’s daily needs and behavior to fully automate dosing procedures.

View attachment 2820121
The actual question might be “what do you guys think about a more expensive way to dose your additives”. And the other question might be who says we need higher accuracy?
 

melbournedan

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
135
Reaction score
56
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Melbourne
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm not part of the "no water change" crowd, so dosing trace elements isn't part of my setup, and I can't comment on that part. I could see some potential benefit if this was for two part.
Also, the cost of the unit would be a factor into any gains made using the system versus equipment already available.
so you get away without dosing because of frequent water changes using a quality salt ?
 

HBtank

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
2,209
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Huntington Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ugh, this system is right up there with other unnecessary/expensive technologies, like automatic testing, that I will never consider.

One piece of equipment can't permanently calibrate another if it IT isn't calibrated....
 

HBtank

Valuable Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
2,209
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Huntington Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But, I will say in the context of dosing (mixing up batches), everyone should have a scale they trust, or premeasured bags from BRS if you are lazy :grinning-squinting-face: . Not a fan of measuring spoons/cups etc. for dry materials.
 
BRS

Polyp polynomial: How many heads do you start with when buying zoas?

  • One head is enough to get started.

    Votes: 27 10.6%
  • 2 to 4 heads.

    Votes: 145 57.1%
  • 5 heads or more.

    Votes: 65 25.6%
  • Full colony.

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 7 2.8%
Reef Chasers Aquaculture
Back
Top