The phosphorous checker, but they all seems to lose consistency after about a year or so. I have more consistent results with salifert on everything other than phosphorous. Yes, all my testing procedures are consistent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How are you determining the change in consistency over time, would be interested in your procedure if you would like to share it...The phosphorous checker, but they all seems to lose consistency after about a year or so. I have more consistent results with salifert on everything other than phosphorous. Yes, all my testing procedures are consistent.
Getting different results with consecutive tests, I believe it is from the diode/sensor reading the wavelength wearing out.How are you determining the change in consistency over time, would be interested in your procedure if you would like to share it...
Thanks
Rick
Thanks for the reply...much appreciated. Do you compare your results with previous results or run multiple tests of the same sample and compare the variability of the results with previous variability?Getting different results with consecutive tests, I believe it is from the diode/sensor reading the wavelength wearing out.
all cuvettes are always rinsed and stored with ro/di
procedure:
1) Fill cuvette so bottom of the meniscus lines up with 10 mL mark when sat on a level surface.
2) close cuvette, dry off, then Wipe any fingerprints off with Kim wipe
3) drop cuvette in tester with “10 mL” mark facing the front (side with screen and button)
4) blank read
5) remove cuvette (not touching the center of it at all) add reagent packet, start timer and shake until powder is dissolved.
6) place cuvette back in tester in the same orientation with 10 mL mark facing the front
7) get result
My degree is in marine biology and I worked at my university’s Finfish research facility after graduation for a few years. Lots of water testing with spectrophotmetry for the grants we were working on, so I’m confident in my testing procedures. I now do aquarium installation and maintenance full time with about 175 customers.
The Hanna testers can be nice, but have their drawbacks. They’re affordable being colorimeters, but hitting high quality hardware at that price point can be hard. It’s very convenient having a digital readout. I think people just want to believe it because it spits out a number on a digital display, which seems more definitive than determining the exact point a color changes on a simple titration test.
edit: I will add, I’ve gone through probably 20 of the salinity pens at this point too, nice when they work, but like to error out, drift, lose calibration, etc.
What do you use for Alk then?I use it for phosphate and high range nitrate. All the people using it for alk are crazy in my opinion. I have done tests back to back and got totally different results from the same reagent. I have also compared different batches of reagent and those results were completely different also.
Used to use Hanna checker, now just salifert and kh guardianWhat do you use for Alk then?
I compare them to results of the same sample using the same cuvette.Thanks for the reply...much appreciated. Do you compare your results with previous results or run multiple tests of the same sample and compare the variability of the results with previous variability?
I use four of the checkers and promote them. A digital read out takes the guess out of the reading and is repeatable. There is too much variation in determining the result by choosing a color and in many cases only a slight variation in your choice of color can make a big difference in the end reading.Eggs over easy: What Hanna checkers do you use?
Water testing is important and many reef keepers use Hanna checkers to monitor their water quality. For many of us, the benefit of seeing a number on a screen instead of trying to judge the shade of pink, green, or some other color is significant. The Hanna checkers include meters for phosphates, nitrate, ammonia, magnesium, calcium, alkalinity, and more. Some reef keepers have even use 3D printed racks to keep their Hanna checkers and the related reagents organized. However, not everyone uses these testers and some have stayed with the color strips related to manual testing while others have moved to automated testing solutions. What is your experience with the Hanna checkers? Which options do you have and which ones do your regularly use? Please share your thoughts in the discussion thread!
View attachment 3050889
Photo by @RobB’z Reef
SalifertWhat do you use for Alk then?
I'd stick to salifert. Only reason I use hanna for nitrate and phosphate is because I'm just checking to make sure it's not 0 for the most part lol.Would like to get MG and CA, what you guys think about it? Worth them or stick with salifer and wife eyes (i'm color blind)
Calcium is doable if you have well-coordinated hands, have your own pipettes, and don't use the syringes included in the kit. The pipetter is fine, but I prefer a more scientific grade one.Would like to get MG and CA, what you guys think about it? Worth them or stick with salifer and wife eyes (i'm color blind).
I am going to have to give this a try...I have several Checkers that I have had for quite a while and curious if they follow the same pattern that you have observed...Thanks for your replyI compare them to results of the same sample using the same cuvette.
Me too, sort of. The dKH Alkalinity tester is my most used test and the most important for me. Calcium ... mine is over the top, and I actually use API tests for that because it's a "count the drops" test with each drop being 20 ppm, and if you have a lot of CA, it can handle it. I used Salifert and the titration fluid would run out before I got a color change.I use the DKH Alkalinity and Phosphate but stick to Salifert for Magnesium, Calcium, Potassium and Nitrate.