- Joined
- Dec 1, 2016
- Messages
- 309
- Reaction score
- 190
Any thoughts on best lens for a Canon 6D? My wife is a professional studio / portrait photographer and the 6D is pretty versatile -105mm with a long lens?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That suuuuuuuuucks! I had a feeling that was going to happen which is why I bit the bullet and bought it a couple years back. Microsoft is trying to force that with Office now too. No thanks!Lightroom is subscription only now, you can't purchase it outright.
How about a straight 50mm 1.8, $129. The good ole nifty fifty.I Already Have Canon 600D with 100mm Macro and 50 mm, I am looking for a decent lens but not too pricey up to 200$ which can give good full tank shot, I was using 18-55 mm kit lens for FTS until it was broken.
How about a straight 50mm 1.8, $129. The good ole nifty fifty.
Uhp, sorry. I see that now. I spit that out as a knee-jerk reaction because so many people Overlook that lens. I can just get my 5ft tank in with mine. If I back up to the front door.
A better macro generally has a fixed focal length. For most people the difference wouldn't be noticeable. (me especially). The tamron has a f stop capable of 2.8 I believe. This will give you such a narrow depth of field. I prefer f9 or f12 for my coral shots. That big f value(2.8) is where the extra cost comes in. Not needed imo.I have a Nikon D7200 camera I've been looking a lot lately into purchasing a macro lens I know the Tamron 90 has been highly recommended (especially on here) I've also been contemplating the Sigma - 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM All-in-One Zoom Lens
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/sigma-...-lens-for-nikon-black/9889572.p?skuId=9889572
Does anyone have any input as to justify the difference (especially the price) between these two and which would be better over all as well as if one is better for a starter lens?
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
Mike
A better macro generally has a fixed focal length. For most people the difference wouldn't be noticeable. (me especially). The tamron has a f stop capable of 2.8 I believe. This will give you such a narrow depth of field. I prefer f9 or f12 for my coral shots. That big f value(2.8) is where the extra cost comes in. Not needed imo.
I personally am a big fan of sigma lenses and have a pretty fast one for kids ball games. I think you could get as good a picture if not better with the Tele photo. Look at minimum focus distant. That comes into play more for me.
Just my limited experience. I'm sure there are some with better opinions, but no one has replied yet.
Best of luck to you.
Which sigma lens would you recommend for my Nikon?
Sorry, I'm just getting into this photography thing so a lot of it is foreign lingo to me, lol.