Claude Schuhmacher suggests, long term, Soda Ash lowers pH. Any truth to this?

Skep18

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
901
Location
Southeast US
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I may be misunderstanding but in the time stamped link below from Frag Garage channel, "Episode 15: Claude Schuhmacher - Fauna Marin" Claude Schuhmacher seems to dismiss the idea that Soda Ash provides any meaningful benefit to pH, at least, "not for [a] long time." Is there merit to this? Can anyone explain? @Randy Holmes-Farley Are we all doing it wrong?

 

sean151

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
76
Reaction score
39
Location
MV, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not having time to watch, but iirc generally only hydroxide additions will provide longer (still under 24hrs) Ph gain. Disregarding alkalinity change, the temporary Ph gain is from converting CO2 to carbonate and freeing some O2. This causes a temporary disparity versus the natural CO2 level in the tank and will eventually equalize around the level of the surrounding air. If your goal is to maintain alkalinity at set level x, say 8.0, then depending on your alkalinity consumption rate you will only see the small Ph hits during the times of dosing. With hydroxide you're doing more conversions on the way to creating the carbonate which requires more CO2, thus driving Ph up faster (inverse relationship).

For anyone reading, be extra mindful when dealing with hydroxide solutions as they are generally very high Ph and can instantly sopanify the oils on your skin (best case scenario). Also requires specific type of plastic (forget the # off the top of my head) as containers need to be very chemically resistant.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,970
Reaction score
10,747
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
at least, "not for [a] long time."
He's arguing the pH elevation advantage of carbonate over bicarbonate doesn't last for a long time, as it'll equalize. He also suggests that the equalization over time is smaller with bicarbonate, so he likes it for that stability reason.

Lots and lots of people prefer the higher pH alk additives even accepting that over time the pH boosts decrease as equalization with atmospheric CO2 occurs.
 

Garf

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
5,751
Reaction score
6,706
Location
BEEFINGHAM
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I may be misunderstanding but in the time stamped link below from Frag Garage channel, "Episode 15: Claude Schuhmacher - Fauna Marin" Claude Schuhmacher seems to dismiss the idea that Soda Ash provides any meaningful benefit to pH, at least, "not for [a] long time." Is there merit to this? Can anyone explain? @Randy Holmes-Farley Are we all doing it wrong?

The fact that using high pH additives does usually increase the pH of the tank overall is just a symptom of tanks not being fully equilized to atmospheric CO2. My tank gets to 8.5 regularly, for example. If it were fully aerated it shouldn't exceed 8.3ish given my Alkalinity.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,970
Reaction score
10,747
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The fact that using high pH additives does usually increase the pH of the tank overall is just a symptom of tanks not being fully equilized to atmospheric CO2.
This is true, and we normally think of anything that's not in equilibrium as temporary and not ideal.
But we need to think differently about CO2 equilibrium, because the CO2 equilibrium with saltwater is so slow, alk additives often have such high pH and indoor air has so much CO2, that our systems are basically never in CO2-equilibrium. So it's fine to run the system counting on the fact that we can dose high pH additives around the clock and keep our tanks on the low-CO2-side of equilibrium 24/7. It's weird to try to keep that in mind and remember that aggressive aeration works against that - if that is your goal - you don't want CO2 equilibrium.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just reiterating what folks in this thread have said...

It is unquestionable that using carbonate causes a pH boost, and hydroxide causes a bit over twice the pH boost, while bicarbonate produces a slight pH lowering, all for the same total alkalinity added.

It is certainly true that any tank with good aeration is always driving the tank toward equilibrium with the air, and if you alter the pH by adding or consuming CO2 (which is what these additives do), then the pH will start to move back toward equilibrium with the air. Thus, all of these effects do not last forever, and how fast they drift away will depend on the degree of aeration.

If you primary goal is unchanging pH, then you would use a mix of mostly bicarbonate and a little carbonate, with the exact ratio depending on the pH that you want to hold at. More bicarbonate relative to carbonate if you are trying to hold at a lower pH.

That said, there's no evidence that I have seen that an absolutely steady pH is desirable. It does not happen in nature, and there is pretty strong evidence that higher pH leads to faster hard coral growth rates, while pH too low stresses corals.

IMO hard corals will do best in the 8.2 to 8.5 pH range. They are OK in the pH 7.8 to 8.2 range, and are stressed below pH 7.7. It is somewhat unclear whether going above pH 8.5 is desirable or undesirable from this perspective.
 
OP
OP
Skep18

Skep18

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
901
Location
Southeast US
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thanks everyone for the responses! Certainly what I'm hearing is what I've always heard. Nothing new. I just found it shocking that a company such as Fauna Marin would seemingly be against the use of soda ash. Was just curious if anyone understood the perspective enough such that the general community might agree with it. It sounds like not, which again, inherently seems counter intuitive seeing as he owns a company and we're all hobbyists on forums. lol. But I will have to find a way to survive with that disparity...
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would add to the above discussion even the pH stability argument is negligible if one doses the alk supplements spread out through the day. Then there are many tiny boosts that end up with stable pH (from the dosing) while pH will be variable from photosynthesis and respiration (as usual).
 
OP
OP
Skep18

Skep18

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
901
Location
Southeast US
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I would add to the above discussion even the pH stability argument is negligible if one doses the alk supplements spread out through the day. Then there are many tiny boosts that end up with stable pH (from the dosing) while pH will be variable from photosynthesis and respiration (as usual).

I would not want to ask you outright come out against Claude's comments but I'm not able to come up with any thought process that seems plausible as to the proposed mindset... Even more odd is the claim the sodium bicarbonate has a higher long term (whatever that means) pH benefit...
 

BigMonkeyBrain

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 17, 2023
Messages
222
Reaction score
128
Location
Northern Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would not want to ask you outright come out against Claude's comments but I'm not able to come up with any thought process that seems plausible as to the proposed mindset... Even more odd is the claim the sodium bicarbonate has a higher long term (whatever that means) pH benefit...
I need a chemist

"The formula for sodium bicarbonate is NaHCO3. There is another compound called washing soda or sodium carbonate, which has the formula Na2CO3. Heating baking soda drives off the hydrogen and gives you washing soda. Dissolving baking soda yields one sodium ion and one bicarbonate anion (HCO3–).

Dissolving washing soda gives you two sodium ions and one carbonate ion (CO32-)."

Probably happens !

“So let it be written, so let it be done”
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There is no possible scenario where dosing bicarbonate leads to a higher pH than dosing the same amount of alk with carbonate to reach the same alkalinity.

Likewise, there is no possible scenario where dosing carbonate leads to a higher pH than dosing the same amount of alk with hydroxide.

Precipitation of calcium carbonate makes the analysis more complicated, but at the same final alk in the water, the above statements are always true.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I need a chemist

"The formula for sodium bicarbonate is NaHCO3. There is another compound called washing soda or sodium carbonate, which has the formula Na2CO3. Heating baking soda drives off the hydrogen and gives you washing soda. Dissolving baking soda yields one sodium ion and one bicarbonate anion (HCO3–).

Dissolving washing soda gives you two sodium ions and one carbonate ion (CO32-)."

Probably happens !

“So let it be written, so let it be done”

OMG, isnt the internet great? lol

You do not drive off hydrogen, you drive off carbon dioxide and water.

2NaHCO3 —> H2O + CO2 + Na2CO3
 

Felix_Brown

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Location
London, UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been reading the manual and at some point it states:

"If you have been previously dosing kalkwasser or high pH carbonate solutions, it will take extra time
for the Bolus to settle down, this is the process of rectifying the damage that has been done to the
buffer system. The Bolus will heal that damage over time, this can take a number of weeks, maybe months."

What is the basis for this? It doesn't make sense to me, I've been dosing sodium carbonate for years and never had this damage they claim... Sounds like scaremongering in order to sell more.

Is this really true?
 

ryanjohn1

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
2,326
Reaction score
4,791
Location
quakertown
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would imagine it’s hard for a company to make money off something that’s already cheap and readily available and has proven effectiveness like dosing limewater. So it’s kinda the play book to discourage its use while providing a new even better solution.
 

Felix_Brown

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Location
London, UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would imagine it’s hard for a company to make money off something that’s already cheap and readily available and has proven effectiveness like dosing limewater. So it’s kinda the play book to discourage its use while providing a new even better solution.

Would be great if @Randy Holmes-Farley could shed some light on that statement as personally I think it is poor for a company to spread what I feel is a lie...
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been reading the manual and at some point it states:

"If you have been previously dosing kalkwasser or high pH carbonate solutions, it will take extra time
for the Bolus to settle down, this is the process of rectifying the damage that has been done to the
buffer system. The Bolus will heal that damage over time, this can take a number of weeks, maybe months."

What is the basis for this? It doesn't make sense to me, I've been dosing sodium carbonate for years and never had this damage they claim... Sounds like scaremongering in order to sell more.

Is this really true?

There is no basis for this. We discuss it in detail here:

 

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top