Bolus dosing

ReneReef

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
62
Reaction score
78
Location
The Netherlands
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok I’ll do some testing today and report back. I switched my Bolus dose off for today and I have just run a test and kh is now 7.6. It’s 08:41 in the UK
That would be great. In the mean time I think some interpolation is in order.


I see one problem in the interpretation. That is using the 1 dKH change as daily consumption, while the bolus dosing and KH measurement points are not aligned. So, the 1 KH is actually measured over 18 hours and not 24 and some interpolation is in order.

If assuming, the FM calculator is wrong, the KH mix is 100 grams of bicarbonate per liter, then a dose of 250mL in 650L would give a KH rise of about 1.285.

Exemple time line on october 14th:
6:00 AM KH measurement 7.7
8:30 AM Bolus dose
9:00 AM lights on Bolus style (120%)
12:00 PM KH measurement 8.7
6:00 PM KH measurement 8.2
12:00 PM KH measurement 7.8

From 6 to 8:30 the KH will drop slightly below 7.7.
These 1.5 hours are problably negligible, maybe 0.05-0.1 KH, looking a the data from other days.

After bolus dose and lights on the dosed KH will be consumed during 3 hours before the next KH measurement at noon. Additionally, the max light output should (according to the Bolus manual) be during the first few hours after the bolus dose.

So at least 0.5 dKH consumption in 6 hours. Or 0.25 in 3 hours. Likely a bit more because of the higher light intensity during the period. This means that the peak KH directly after dosing the bolus dose was likely close to 9 dKH.

Therefore, the daily KH drop would in my opinion more likely be 1+0.25+a bit more+maybe 0.05 = ~1.28 to 1.29 KH consumption a day.
 

andrewb70

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 30, 2020
Messages
54
Reaction score
28
Location
London
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok just had a noon kh test and it is 7.3. yesterday at noon was 8.8 so circa 1.5 usage over 24 hour period. This is with Bolus dose off. I plumbed that drop into the Fauna Marin Calculator and it says I should be dosing 195ml per day so something slightly off there !

I maybe off with my tank volume of course (48x21x27) 425 litres plus sump (48x15x18) 90 litres half full. Frag Tank (36x15x24) 210 litres. So around 720 litres without displacement and equipment.

I will stay at 250ml and run some more testing during the week.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,100
Reaction score
69,741
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I plumbed that drop into the Fauna Marin Calculator and it says I should be dosing 195ml per day so something slightly off there !

The problem is likely their faulty info on potency.
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
30,666
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately, my KH director broke a few weeks ago. Haven't replaced it with a new one. During the last week I have measured manually in the morning and evening - Alkalinity is around 8.6 dKH at 10:00 and drops to around 7.6 at 22:00. I have measured the pH during the last week and compared it with my dosage which only happened between 10:00 pm and 10:00 am (10 pm to 10 am). The light schedule has been - full blast between 10:00 and 14:30 and then 65% until 22:00.

Light schedule

1729413281795.png

result in pH

1729413196812.png



From today - I have changed my light schedule to my normal - like this

1729413379363.png


I will follow this up during next week

Sincerely Lasse
 

djf91

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
879
Location
St. Louis, Mo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure if this exact point has been discussed already given all the talk about lighting but here’s something I’ve noticed.

Two weeks ago I increased my photoperiod by 1.5 hours going from 6 hours with my metal halides to 7.5 hours. Since then I’ve noticed a full .1 shift upwards in my pH. I run pretty intense metal halides but the corals have responded with more polyp extension and more intense colors and maybe more growth. I think this aligns with the photoperiods people used to run back in 90-00’s where some people ran 12 hours of metal halide per day. I think just running a longer photoperiod will result in higher pH thus causing healthier corals/ more growth.

Sorry if this has already been discussed.
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
30,666
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the corals have responded with more polyp extension
For me and IMO - this is a sign of increased photosynthesis - the corals needs more area for the diffusion of excess oxygen production from the photosynthesis. This in itself does not necessarily mean better health status. just that more surface area is needed to increase the diffusion of oxygen per unit of time and thus reduce the risk of the formation of oxygen radicals that can damage (burn) the corals.

Sincerely Lasse
 

ReneReef

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
62
Reaction score
78
Location
The Netherlands
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure if this exact point has been discussed already given all the talk about lighting but here’s something I’ve noticed.

Two weeks ago I increased my photoperiod by 1.5 hours going from 6 hours with my metal halides to 7.5 hours. Since then I’ve noticed a full .1 shift upwards in my pH. I run pretty intense metal halides but the corals have responded with more polyp extension and more intense colors and maybe more growth. I think this aligns with the photoperiods people used to run back in 90-00’s where some people ran 12 hours of metal halide per day. I think just running a longer photoperiod will result in higher pH thus causing healthier corals/ more growth.

Sorry if this has already been discussed.
Your observations are completely logical.
pH in our tanks is determined by CO2. Increasing the photoperiod or light intensity means more photosynthesis and more CO2 consumed and consequently a higher pH. Although, the pH increase by more lighting is limited by the CO2 available in the water.

In effect, all the pH increasing measures we can employ lower CO2.

The Bolus method calls for two things a change in KH dose timing and an increase in lighting. It has been discussed here at length that the pH gain is most likely due to the increased lighting and not the bolus dose.

Lasse is experimenting to separate the effects of the lighting increase and the bolus dose.
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
2,560
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
corals have responded with more polyp extension
More polyp extension means more light exposure of the zooxanthellae. I think it is generally accepted that this is the background of polyp extension of zooxanthellate cnidarians.

In my experience more polyp extension is often associated with lower pH/more CO2, phosphate availablility/dosing and in this way generally better conditions for photosynthesis. Polyp contraction means the opposite and more "self shading" of zooxanthellae.

Polyps are generally more open in the night and in the morning (lower pH), so the time of the observation has to be taken into account.
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
30,666
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Night open polyps - feeding behaviour. Open polyps during light probably not a feeding behaviour (because normally lack of anything to feed - at least in nature) and it is risky according predation from polyp eating animals. There must be a reason why some acropora species sometimes show their polyps in full light. To maxim the light exposure to the zooxanthella inside polyps (zooxanthella exist in the normal skin too) can be one reason but the the mechanism of getting rid of oxygen is often underrated IMO. When LPS expand their body (and also for soft coals with photosynthesis) is IMO both to enlarge the photon catching area and get rid of surplus oxygen produced of the altered rate of photosynthesis.

Sincerely Lasse
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
30,666
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lasse is experimenting to separate the effects of the lighting increase and the bolus dose.
Yes - but I do not get the expected result - as it looks like now - my total photosynthesis expelled as pH seems to be higher with my normal light schedule. Experiment will continue.

1729881670711.png



KH (7.8 - 8 dKH at 20:00) have been stable during the whole period. So also the dose amount of Core 7:3a+b

Sincerely Lasse
 
Back
Top