An honest review of the Giesemann Stellar

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I started my reef journey many moons ago when keeping softies was considered an accomplishment. Over the years I have been amazed by the advances and technology that has become available to us. It is really incredible how far we have come in this hobby.

By nature I am a techno-geek and eye candy junky. My two hobbies ( Reefing and Astrophotography) satisfy my never ending fascination with gadgets, technology, science, and the beauty of nature. As such I am guilty of being an early adopter of new products and technology.

In terms of lighting, I was a very early adopter of LED lighting for Reef aquaria. My first LED was the original Solaris for anyone that remembers that fixture. It worked well and yes it convinced me that one could grow corals with LED's. Over the years I was forced to return to MH/T5 combos as the Solaris died and the company with it.

Later on, I played with the nano-tuner LED for a fluval edge that I turned into a Pico reef, the AI nano and subsequently Vega. More Recently I moved on to the Radion G4. I have always preferred the lack of heat and the greater control of LED's but honestly the shadowing and peculiar growth patterns of my corals always bothered me.

I am in the process of a new build- a reefer 425xl and planned on using my Radion G4 Pros. When I heard of the Aquatic-Life "T5/bring your own LED" hybrid fixture, my interest was immediately perked. Although this fixture does the job it is simply to utilitarian for my tastes and I was not impressed with the fit and finish and the average reflectors.

Enter the Giesemann Stellar.....

I first encountered news of this fixture on reef builders and thought to myself "ahh finally! someone will make a high quality hybrid." I had experience with Giesemann in the past having used their T5 fixtures and really looked forward to this being a possible solution for my needs. Giesemann is known for well constructed high quality products and I had no doubts this would be the quality answer for a hybrid fixture with the flexibility of using your desired LED. Further it appeared to be based on their Gemini fixture which I find to be visually appealing, sleek and well constructed.

I searched for a date that it would be available in the US and stumbled upon the fact that I could order directly from them. I went ahead and pulled the trigger and ordered the 900mm iridium version that will house 4 x 39 watt T5 bulbs and the LED of your choice. The space available for the LED's using the standard bracket is 10 inches which is more than ample for my Radions.

I received an email that they would be making a 110v version for me and that it would ship in a couple weeks. I also ordered the optional shortening end brackets that take the fixture from 575mm front to back down to 500mm. I thought this would be a better fit for my tank (turns out the standard works well for the XL version of reefer, however if you have a 250, 350, 450, you will need the shortening brackets or the fixture will extend beyond the width of the aquarium).

Several weeks later shipping was confirmed and the product arrived Fedex in good condition. It was well packaged and protected and suffered no damage in transit. My initial impression was excellent, the finish was a nice dark (not black but gray like) powder coated finish. The classic Giesemann logo on the end, and the build solid and sturdy. The fixture comes unassembled with two T5 housings which contain high quality reflectors and an acrylic shield already completed. Two standard end brackets, LED brackets, a bag of screws and nuts, and some fairly rudimentary instructions.

I placed the two T5 housings on the floor and lined them up, I attached the side brackets (the shorter version I had ordered extra) and used the supplied screws. There are two sizes of screws to be aware of ( this is not mentioned in the instructions so be careful). Two thiner screws which go on the front and back ends of the brackets, and two fatter screws for the middle two holes. The thinner screw heads are quite small and fragile, the pilot holes are not tapped so be careful as it is very easy to strip the heads. I almost stripped one of mine.

With this completed, you can insert the LED brackets into the groove on the inside surfaced of the housings. You can do this before attaching the end brackets but it doesn't matter as they angle out. The LED brackets have an adhesive tape which will help lock your LED's in place. I would have preferred a more sturdy method but this works. I also purchased the hanging kit which comes without instructions but is similar to others on the market.

IMG_8574.JPG IMG_8584.JPG

Next I went to insert my T5 bulbs and encountered the first shortcoming of the fixture. Unlike the Gemini housing that has a notch on the end allowing for sliding out of the acrylic shield, the Stellar does NOT. Why?? I have no idea as it makes no sense not to include it. I can only surmise that this was an oversight in their design of the fixture. I emailed Giesemann regarding this. I received no response so after a couple days I emailed another person at their company and was told they would get back to me. The response was not what I wanted to hear. Basically I was told to just loosen the screws securing one of the end brackets, angle it and pull out the acrylic shield.

Here is their response:

"no the end plates do not have a notch. To replace the T5 lamps later and to remove the acrylic shield you can loosen the outer screw and flip the profile slightly.
This allows you to remove the acrylic shield without unmounting the whole end plate."

I had already tried that and although possible, it is quite cumbersome. I can only imagine when I have the fixture hung that this will be even more difficult. Further, each time you loosen those screws on the ends, the heads are in danger of becoming further stripped. Not optimal to say the least. I have emailed them back twice asking if the Gemini fixture end brackets will work on the Stellar (since they have the notch) but I have not yet received a response.

Well I finally managed to remove the acrylic shield and put in my bulbs. I fired up the fixture and the lights come right on without any glitch or issue. I let them burn in for a couple hours to test the fixture and start putting some age on these new bulbs. The light is uniform, the bulbs burn well and the reflectors are excellent.

IMG_8602.JPG IMG_8575.JPG IMG_8584.JPG

I then noticed another issue. There was a lot of heat building up and I became aware that the shortening brackets do not have ventilation slits! The standard 575mm bracket does have several slits on the end but not these 500mm shortening ones. Why?? again I have to conclude it was an oversight in their design.

IMG_8601.JPG IMG_8600.JPG

I included a question regarding this in my previous email to them. They responded:

"the longer version has this ventilation slits because you can put there bigger LED units with much more power. But in the shortened version you don’t need them! The shortened version has no ventilation slits – it will be not too hot there is no risk."

I'm not really sure what that means. The end bracket width has nothing to do with the type of LED. My G4 Radions fit regardless of the bracket I use. These slits are to allow heat from the T5's to dissipate. Clearly they missed something here. I was concerned enough that I removed the shorter brackets and used the standard ones with the ventilation slits. Luckily my tank is the 425XL so the extra front-back width still works. It is basically the same as the tank-
IMG_8595.JPG IMG_8594.jpg

The brackets do have cut outs for cord management and both T5 power cords come out on the same side.

IMG_8599.JPG

IMG_8597.JPG IMG_8596.JPG

Overall as you can see in the photos, the fixture is well finished and good quality. The shortfalls in the design that I mention are a concern. I am a little disappointed as this is not what I have come to expect from Giesemann. I can understand some oversights but their slow response to my inquiries is not what I have come to expect from them. I have an email pending a response pointing out these issues. I can deal with the longer standard brackets. Money wasted on my part for the shorter brackets that are not useable without ventilation slits in my opinion ( I know others will disagree). However I would really prefer a bracket that allow removal of the acrylic shield for bulb changes such as the Gemini endplate. I am still waiting for a response to this question...

Conclusions:

Overall a nice hybrid fixture that will allow you to use a myriad of LED's on the market. Finish and appearance are sleek and top notch. Reflectors are of high quality as expected of Giesemann products. Aforementioned design flaws notwithstanding, it is a solid contender to the aquatic life fixture but given the cost difference some may not find the difference in quality worth it.

IMG_8586.JPG

UPDATE:

So I received a follow up email from Giesemann. Basically they are sticking to there guns. They stated that the original design was based on the shorter brackets without ventilation slits. They state that they did extensive thermal testing and that there is no problem. The longer end brackets have slits in the event that the "larger" LED's will somehow transmit heat to the T5's hence the need for ventilation.

Exact quote:

"About the different endplates for STELLAR / GEMINI: The stellar came into the market only in the narrow version first. From the beginning the STELLAR endplates where designed without slots, as we made thermal tests with the T-5´s and there was no need for additional slots. If you look at other products from competitors, they have as well no slots on their endplates. The profile of the Stellar / Gemini is made of thick aluminium and the T-5 ballast is mounted flat on the coolest place inside the profile. In a second step we have designed the wider version of the Stellar-plates to allow more flexibility with larger and stronger LED systems. These wider endplates have additional slots because of the risk that stronger LED lights may produce more heat."

Take it for what its worth. I am not going to dispute their "thermal tests" One point however, the competitor they mention I assume is the Aquatic life fixture (I know of no other at present), That fixture has not acrylic shield so the T5's are not enclosed.

In any event there you have it. I will luckily be able to use the longer ventilated brackets in my case but for those with narrower aquaria be forewarned.

In regards to accessing the bulb compartment for bulb changes- again no slit for sliding out of the acrylic shield. Royal PIA to loosen the endplate, further strip the screw heads and angle the bracket while you bend the shield out! o_O
 
Last edited:

2una

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
451
Reaction score
406
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the rundown, I've also been eyeballing these & you raise some very valid concerns.
That no end vent hole's on the shorter ends bars is a worry. End up like an oven in there.
Be nice to see Ati jump into one of these designs with some active cooling & maybe an angle adjustable T5 mount
Hint @ATI Aquaristik @ATI North America
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks! Yes it is an issue. My fixture became extremely hot in the 2 hours I ran it with the short brackets. Not good for the bulbs or the fixture and tank.

I suspect this market will open up and there will many fixtures hitting the vendors soon.
 

madweazl

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,096
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is this the only mount for the LEDs? No shroud over the top to clean up the appearance?

img_8596-jpg.784149
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is this the only mount for the LEDs? No shroud over the top to clean up the appearance?

img_8596-jpg.784149
Yes, there is no cover- the LED's simply lay in the brackets which slide and are adjustable. I have not removed the yellow adhesive cover in the photo. When the fixture is mounted and looked at straight on, you do not see the LED's. They are hidden by the T5 housings.
 

AdamNC

Lawnmower Blenny says nom nom
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
4,118
Reaction score
3,239
Location
Winston Salem NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Any way to take the short end caps to someone with a machine to machine cut some air vents? Or would that void the warranty?
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Any way to take the short end caps to someone with a machine to machine cut some air vents? Or would that void the warranty?

I guess I could but it’s not worth the trouble for me. The standard ends will work for me. I am mentioning it for the benefit of those with the non XL reefers that will need the shorter ends
 

Crimsonvice

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
949
Location
Cincinnati
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Awesomd review. Can you tell me what the maximum size led will fit with the 575mm bracket? I didn't see it in your review.
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Awesomd review. Can you tell me what the maximum size led will fit with the 575mm bracket? I didn't see it in your review.
Thanks! The space available for an LED with the Standard 575 bracket is 10 inches. My Radion G4 Pro XR15 as you can see fits with room to spare. An XR30 will be the same in the long axis horizontal configuration but will not fit in the long axis front to back configuration.
 

Scorpius

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,664
Reaction score
3,759
Location
Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The aquatic life fixture is better imo. Way to many shortfalls to this unit reviewed and quite a disappointment. Guess they got your money so they're happy...
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The aquatic life fixture is better imo. Way to many shortfalls to this unit reviewed and quite a disappointment. Guess they got your money so they're happy...

Well I’m not sure I’d say that. The reflectors a cheap, no acrylic shield, and finish is pretty ho hum. The Giesemann is a very nice fixture but they need to take a step back. It’s supposed to be based on their Gemini. Comparing the two you will see the reflectors and housing are identical. I think they were in too much of a hurry and skipped over some details.

... but yes they have my money... and I was in a hurry and got first in line. [emoji20]
 
Last edited:

Daveyy

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
114
Reaction score
154
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wonderful review! Been waiting to pull the trigger and mounting my 4 x xr15 g4 on this bad boy.

How is the color blending on the T5 / Radion combo?

1) Would love to see what are your thoughts on the effect of the hybrid solution.

2) What bulbs are you running on these? (PS if you have mentioned them earlier. was speed reading)

Thanks!
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks! Color blending looks good as best I can tell on an empty tank.

I think the hybrid solution is a step up from LED only. Ive found the LED only solution has shortcomings in that corals grow in odd directions and the shadowing can be a real issue. The mire diffuse T5 augmentation should work well. In the past I’ve had good success with T5 only so no reason to think they won’t work with LED.

I’m using my old favorites. B+, C+,Actinic, B+ in that order front to back. I use ATI bulbs.
 

ATI North America

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
1,125
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I couldn't see any fans on the T5's, did I miss them in the photos? Also, does anyone know what material is used for the reflectors it wasn't listed on their website. Nice looking fixture though!
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I couldn't see any fans on the T5's, did I miss them in the photos? Also, does anyone know what material is used for the reflectors it wasn't listed on their website. Nice looking fixture though!

No you didn't miss them- they are not there! There is no cooling for the T5's! This is what I mention in my review as a major concern. NO fans and NO ventilation slits if you use the shorter end brackets. If you use the standard brackets, there are some slits on the ends for ventilation.

I am concerned that the heat build up when using the shorter end brackets will be significant. The T5's are closed in with an acrylic shield and no way for heat to dissipate other than through radiation.

The reflectors are the same as the Gemini fixture but I do not see anywhere what material is used.
 
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
UPDATE:

So I received a follow up email from Giesemann. Basically they are sticking to there guns. They stated that the original design was based on the shorter brackets without ventilation slits. They state that they did extensive thermal testing and that there is no problem. The longer end brackets have slits in the event that the "larger" LED's will somehow transmit heat to the T5's hence the need for ventilation.

Exact quote:

"About the different endplates for STELLAR / GEMINI: The stellar came into the market only in the narrow version first. From the beginning the STELLAR endplates where designed without slots, as we made thermal tests with the T-5´s and there was no need for additional slots. If you look at other products from competitors, they have as well no slots on their endplates. The profile of the Stellar / Gemini is made of thick aluminium and the T-5 ballast is mounted flat on the coolest place inside the profile. In a second step we have designed the wider version of the Stellar-plates to allow more flexibility with larger and stronger LED systems. These wider endplates have additional slots because of the risk that stronger LED lights may produce more heat."

Take it for what its worth. I am not going to dispute their "thermal tests" One point however, the competitor they mention I assume is the Aquatic life fixture (I know of no other at present), That fixture has no acrylic shield so the T5's are not enclosed.

In any event there you have it. I will luckily be able to use the longer ventilated brackets in my case but for those with narrower aquaria be forewarned.

In regards to accessing the bulb compartment for bulb changes- again no slit for sliding out of the acrylic shield. Royal PIA to loosen the endplate, further strip the screw heads and angle the bracket while you bend the shield out! o_O
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
CDavmd

CDavmd

AstroReefer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another warning to potential buyers. DO NOT USE the adhesive on the LED brackets unless you never want to get them free again. The foam adhesive is very strong- I was putting my Radion G4 onto the bracket and needed to adjust and it was impossible. Took me a while to finally strong arm the radion off of the brackets only to find adhesive stuck to the Radion.
 

roberthu526

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
1,673
Reaction score
1,222
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I suppose you can drill some holes yourself if you don’t plant to return the fixture. But still a disappointment to see the company stick to their design. The whole thing is enclosed and no ventilation doesn’t make much sense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top