Am i going to be ok with this?

thatindonesianreefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Messages
222
Reaction score
206
Location
Jakarta
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi
So i accidently bought tye wrong hanna phosphate checker (lr instead of ulr) and i just wanted to know, will i be ok in the long run with it? My reef is about 2 years old.
 

Dread Pirate Dave

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 5, 2024
Messages
761
Reaction score
1,641
Location
Amherst, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OP
OP
thatindonesianreefer

thatindonesianreefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Messages
222
Reaction score
206
Location
Jakarta
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You should be fine, that’s what I use, it just won’t be as accurate in the lower ranges ( +/-0.2 ppm for ULR and +/- 0.4 for the LR)
Another and new question is what are these readings as if my phos are really that high my whole tank should be filled with dead corals! Ive used up like two reagents
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6959.jpeg
    IMG_6959.jpeg
    121.1 KB · Views: 18

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
4,069
Reaction score
5,391
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You're fine with the test kit you have.
FWIW .03 mg/l is the minimum threshold level to prevent phosphorus limitation in corals, identified by researchers at Southampton University in England using corals maintained in an aquarium for about a decade. .3 mg/l is what corals are subjected to with upwelling in the ocean. .5 mg/l might be acceptable for some as acros have been shown to increase growth up to this level. .9mg/l is the level the Steinhart Aqaurium's ex situ sexually reproduced acro colonies are being grwon out with. Rich Ross's (who's part of the team at Steinhart) has his acro dominate mixed reef sitting at 1.8 mg/l, his tank can be seen at the beginning of his MACNA presentation on phosphate. You can see his current levels as well as some cool videos of corals spawning in his thread.

 
OP
OP
thatindonesianreefer

thatindonesianreefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Messages
222
Reaction score
206
Location
Jakarta
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You're fine with the test kit you have.
FWIW .03 mg/l is the minimum threshold level to prevent phosphorus limitation in corals, identified by researchers at Southampton University in England using corals maintained in an aquarium for about a decade. .3 mg/l is what corals are subjected to with upwelling in the ocean. .5 mg/l might be acceptable for some as acros have been shown to increase growth up to this level. .9mg/l is the level the Steinhart Aqaurium's ex situ sexually reproduced acro colonies are being grwon out with. Rich Ross's (who's part of the team at Steinhart) has his acro dominate mixed reef sitting at 1.8 mg/l, his tank can be seen at the beginning of his MACNA presentation on phosphate. You can see his current levels as well as some cool videos of corals spawning in his thread.

So is my test kit inaccuarate?
 

The new fish on the block

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
724
Reaction score
313
Location
Okaloosa, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So is my test kit inaccuarate?
If you tested it twice and got the same number, I would say you did the test correctly, the only way to know if it’s inaccurate is comparing test results with a different test kit.

If your corals are fine, I would not worry too much.
 
OP
OP
thatindonesianreefer

thatindonesianreefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Messages
222
Reaction score
206
Location
Jakarta
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you tested it twice and got the same number, I would say you did the test correctly, the only way to know if it’s inaccurate is comparing test results with a different test kit.

If your corals are fine, I would not worry too much.
So the first test it said “0.90” ppm and the second on read “0.83” ppm
 

The new fish on the block

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
724
Reaction score
313
Location
Okaloosa, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So the first test it said “0.90” ppm and the second on read “0.83” ppm
If you use the mean of those two numbers it would be at 0.865 honestly if you aren’t keeping anything super sensitive like acros, I would not be too worried about that number, of course I would be trying to get it down a bit lower but I would not drive myself crazy over it.
 
OP
OP
thatindonesianreefer

thatindonesianreefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Messages
222
Reaction score
206
Location
Jakarta
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you use the mean of those two numbers it would be at 0.865 honestly if you aren’t keeping anything super sensitive like acros, I would not be too worried about that number, of course I would be trying to get it down a bit lower but I would not drive myself crazy over it.
Yea i dont have any sps at the moment just softies and lps
 

ChiCity

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
4,755
Reaction score
5,215
Location
funky town
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
You're fine with the test kit you have.
FWIW .03 mg/l is the minimum threshold level to prevent phosphorus limitation in corals, identified by researchers at Southampton University in England using corals maintained in an aquarium for about a decade. .3 mg/l is what corals are subjected to with upwelling in the ocean. .5 mg/l might be acceptable for some as acros have been shown to increase growth up to this level. .9mg/l is the level the Steinhart Aqaurium's ex situ sexually reproduced acro colonies are being grwon out with. Rich Ross's (who's part of the team at Steinhart) has his acro dominate mixed reef sitting at 1.8 mg/l, his tank can be seen at the beginning of his MACNA presentation on phosphate. You can see his current levels as well as some cool videos of corals spawning in his thread.


guy might not realize it…
but you doled out some excellent information.
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
4,069
Reaction score
5,391
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So is my test kit inaccuarate?

You test kit is fine and is more than accurate enough. FWIW, any single test result from a given test kit should be taken with a grain of salt. There are a range of variables including daily fluctuations in parameters and fluctuations from one place to another in an aquarium and inaccuracies on the part of aquarists that can cause variation from one test to the next. If you want to vewrify a tester or test kit "standards" are available that will give a known result but it's easier to use multiple test kits to get an average. I've attached a comparison of test kits done by the Dallas reefer club a few years ago and you can see there's quite a bit of variable results using the same set of test kits.
 

Attachments

  • DFMAS TestKitAnalysis.pdf
    329.2 KB · Views: 20

HAVE YOU EVER KEPT A RARE/UNCOMMON FISH, CORAL, OR INVERT? SHOW IT OFF IN THE THREAD!

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top